16:00:44 #startmeeting docteam 16:00:45 Meeting started Wed May 30 16:00:44 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is pkovar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:46 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:49 The meeting name has been set to 'docteam' 16:00:52 who's around for a meeting today? 16:04:30 let me just do a couple of announcements 16:04:46 in the hope people will read them in the minutes 16:05:40 #topic Ops docs discussion 16:05:45 #link http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-operators/2018-May/015318.html 16:05:49 #info Ops community plans to take ownership of the ops, ha and architecture guides 16:06:38 #info though the details and scope of content are to be agreed on yet 16:07:02 #info primarily, the community wants to work on ops guide 16:09:21 #topic Contributor Guide lead 16:09:26 #info After Mike P's departure, Kendall N is the new lead 16:09:37 #topic Default warning-is-error to True for non-legacy Sphinx projects 16:09:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/559348/ 16:09:47 #info Just merged today 16:11:46 #topic Vancouver Summit 16:11:51 #info Docs-i18N - Project Update recording available online, thanks to everybody involved! 16:11:55 #link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIGErKqXAy8 16:12:36 #topic Bug Triage Team 16:12:41 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Documentation/SpecialityTeams 16:12:45 #info Backlog stable, number of unresolved bugs started to decrease recently 16:14:42 stephenfin : is there some sort of mailing list announcement of the docs job change in https://review.openstack.org/559348 ? 16:15:08 dhellmann: Yup. It's on zuul-announce 16:15:31 I guess you mean openstack-dev though? 16:15:46 If so, no. I can do one now though 16:15:54 there is an old thread only, i think 16:16:00 maybe a follow-up? 16:16:13 stephenfin : yes, on openstack-dev. I don't assume openstack contributors read zuul-announce 16:16:17 with don't panic in subject line 16:16:28 yeah, a follow-up with "we finally did this" is fine 16:16:40 I just don't want a bunch of folks surprised if their jobs break :-) 16:16:50 or I at least want something to point them to to explain it :-) 16:17:13 pkovar : while we're both here -- is the status of the operations guide thing clear to you after my most recent email on that thread? 16:18:38 dhellmann: it is clearer, i saw in some other email mentioned they are interested in taking over all three guides 16:18:48 ah, ok 16:18:50 that did come up 16:18:50 but if they just want to go with ops for now, good 16:18:56 I encouraged them to start small 16:19:01 easier to migrate 16:19:03 yeah 16:19:09 though not from the wiki 16:19:27 dhellmann: i thought they would just copy the rst files from openstack-manuals? 16:20:02 that's what I recommended 16:20:03 wiki conversion won't be lossless i am afraid 16:20:10 I don't think they've changed the content substantially 16:20:26 feels like extra work for no extra benefit 16:20:32 right 16:20:38 converting to wiki and then back again 16:20:46 that way lies madness 16:20:51 heh 16:22:56 #topic Ops docs discussion 16:22:58 #info when migrating the ops guide, it might be easier for ops folks to just copy the rst files from openstack-manuals 16:23:35 #info and save time on conversion from wiki 16:23:45 alright, anything else anybody? :) 16:24:53 oh, sorry, I didn't realize we were in the middle of meeting time :-) 16:25:23 that's absolutely fine, we can just include our thoughts in the meeting minutes and share them 16:25:48 thanks 16:25:49 #endmeeting