09:00:17 <oanson> #startmeeting Dragonflow
09:00:18 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Mar 20 09:00:17 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is oanson. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
09:00:19 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
09:00:21 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'dragonflow'
09:00:45 <nick-ma_> Hi
09:00:50 <dimak> hello
09:01:06 <oanson> We'll wait another minute. Then we'll start
09:01:18 <lihi> Hi
09:01:23 <ishafran> Hi
09:01:26 <itamaro> hi
09:01:45 <oanson> #info nick-ma_ dimak lihi ishafran itamaro in meeting
09:01:54 <oanson> xiaohhui, are you here too?
09:02:13 <xiaohhui> yeah,
09:02:23 <oanson> #info xiaohhui also in meeting
09:02:27 <oanson> Great! Let's start.
09:02:32 <oanson> #topic Roadmap
09:02:43 <oanson> lihi, hit us with the IPv6 stuff
09:03:35 <lihi> The SG is almost done. I need to make a small fix to the tests
09:04:03 <oanson> Great!
09:04:12 <oanson> Do you have an ETA?
09:04:45 <lihi> tomorrow probably. After I'll finish with the migration
09:04:58 <oanson> Sure!
09:05:06 <oanson> dimak, SFC?
09:05:33 <dimak> Haven't made a lot of progress due to many small things I had to take care of
09:05:53 <dimak> But I am testing now mpls unaware port pairs
09:06:11 <oanson> Cool
09:06:40 <dimak> Other than that I have some comments to fix
09:06:49 <oanson> All right
09:06:53 <oanson> Chassis health - I don't know if we discussed this previously. But this needs a carrier for the last mile.
09:07:15 <oanson> If there are no volunteers, I can take this next week. If anyone's free, it would be nice to get this to the finish line
09:07:30 <oanson> (Or did someone already volunteer and I forgot?)
09:08:03 <xiaohhui> I said I would take this in previous meeting
09:08:08 <xiaohhui> but I am not free recently
09:08:38 <oanson> xiaohhui, I heard. Congratulations.
09:08:49 <xiaohhui> If you would like take it, that would be good from my point of view.
09:08:51 <oanson> If you can't get to it, I can take it.
09:08:53 <xiaohhui> thanks,
09:09:07 <oanson> Sure. Summary: I took it. Will do it next week :)
09:09:30 <oanson> sNAT - the patch is waiting for review. ishafran, anything to say on this?
09:09:47 <ishafran> all comments are closed
09:10:04 <ishafran> actually I'm waiting for merge :)
09:10:19 <oanson> All right. We'll try to get to it as soon as we can.
09:10:39 <ishafran> great
09:10:47 <oanson> NB API refactor
09:11:12 <oanson> Work is coming along. QoS and LSwitch are ready for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/441950/
09:12:10 <oanson> SG and lport are WIP here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445548 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447366
09:12:29 <oanson> I think SG will be done today, hopefully lport tomorrow.
09:12:46 <xiaohhui> And loudos-review.huawei.com/#/q/dragonflow
09:12:54 <xiaohhui> cloudos-review.huawei.com/#/q/dragonflow
09:13:21 <oanson> Then VLAN aware VMs will be rebased on top of that and can be tested manually (I hope)
09:13:23 <xiaohhui> sorry, don't know what happened
09:13:38 <xiaohhui> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443648/
09:14:04 <xiaohhui> This is the migration for lrouter and lrouter port, I will reshape it these days.
09:14:15 <oanson> Yes. Sorry - LRouter and LRouterPort is also WIP in the link above
09:14:43 <oanson> Anything else for roadmap?
09:15:54 <oanson> Then let's move on
09:15:58 <oanson> #topic Open Discussion
09:16:09 <oanson> nick-ma_, I understood last week you were interested in the iovisor work
09:16:31 <oanson> I invited the person working on this today, but he couldn't make it. I will send you his contact details off-line
09:16:49 <oanson> Actually, he says he will join momentarily.
09:17:48 <lionelze> Hi
09:18:18 <nick-ma_> Ok, thanks
09:18:58 <lionelze> The first step for IOVisor is to check if it's worth to work on it.
09:19:23 <lionelze> What can bring an implementation based on it in place of ovs
09:20:52 <oanson> lionelze, you mean test it performance-wise?
09:21:06 <nick-ma_> Yes, I researched some day, and thought it is a huge work.
09:21:43 <lionelze> I'd like to compare performance between OVS and IOVisor without hardware help.
09:21:55 <oanson> Currently our DF applications are heavily based on OVS/OpenFlow. We will have to find a less hard-coded solution.
09:22:09 <nick-ma_> I tested plumgrid and discussed with the team on the technology. The performance is outstanding.
09:22:41 <nick-ma_> 9g per physical port on vxlan tunneling
09:23:04 <oanson> Nice!
09:23:17 <lionelze> Nice, Do you test small UDP packets?
09:23:57 <nick-ma_> I think I have the report. Will find it.
09:24:16 <nick-ma_> The control plane is not open source.
09:25:12 <lionelze> If we consider that it worth to work on it, the design stage will begin.
09:26:18 <nick-ma_> The documents I think is not sufficient. To implement a full functionality of switch, lots of work needs to be done. s to
09:26:38 <lionelze> You can check this project to see what can be done: https://github.com/iovisor/iovisor-ovn
09:27:07 <nick-ma_> Cool, I dont know ovn is starting working on it.
09:27:13 <lionelze> I know that the work can be huge but it can worth it.
09:27:26 <nick-ma_> Yes, I think so.
09:28:44 <oanson> All right. Anything more on this?
09:29:46 <oanson> Then I guess the floor is free.
09:29:58 <oanson> Anyone wants to bring anything up for discussion?
09:31:05 <oanson> All right.
09:31:07 <oanson> Thanks everyone for coming.
09:31:19 <oanson> #endmeeting