14:03:29 #startmeeting freezer 14:03:30 Meeting started Thu Aug 4 14:03:29 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is m3m0. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:03:32 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:03:34 The meeting name has been set to 'freezer' 14:03:39 who's here for freezer meeting? 14:03:49 o/ 14:03:56 hello m3m0 14:04:52 hello all 14:04:57 let's wait for more people to join 14:05:20 0/ 14:07:40 please add your pending reviews here and topics if you have https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_meetings 14:09:33 #topic freezer mascot 14:09:59 ok this is easy, there is a survey to chose the new mascot, please vote: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/R6VGGGG 14:12:59 i voted 14:14:33 thanks, does anyone have more topics? 14:14:58 timothyb89 ddieterly zhurong yangyapeng ^^ 14:15:16 no, i'm busy with hpe hos related stuff 14:16:19 nothing from me either 14:16:27 no, me too 14:16:33 zhurong: 14:16:52 no from me 14:17:14 yeah I'm the same here 14:17:52 ddieterly: do we need to backport this as well? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350234/2 14:18:21 yes, we should 14:19:02 more reviews: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/349940/ 14:19:06 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/340307/ 14:19:47 yangyapeng: what about this ones: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339477 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350110 14:23:55 ping zhurong 14:24:12 yangyape_: thanks :) 14:24:41 :) 14:26:36 I am here 14:27:15 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339477 if you can review it about dashbord 14:27:46 ddieterly: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/339477/4 please 14:28:30 yangyape_: and what about this one: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/350110/1 14:29:13 yangyape_ are you sure that it will work? 14:29:20 i don't have a way of testing it right now 14:29:32 m3m0: I test it in dashboard. it is ok 14:29:45 where does WEBROOT comes from? 14:29:47 I think the most import patch is this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/335410/ 14:29:51 ddieterly: create job and edit action in job and so on . 14:29:58 m3m0 from horizon dashbaord 14:30:23 ok, so are those 2 commits related? 14:30:40 they look like competing commits 14:32:05 ddieterly: yeah , but the first one , I have no test. 14:32:47 m3m0 url_path have get the full path, I think we doesn't need to using the WEBROOT 14:33:19 zhurong: that's not the case when horizon is configured to have "/horizon/" prefix 14:34:07 WEBROOT can be http://127.0.0.1:8000/horizon or http://127.0.0.1:8000/ and there is a distinction there for javascript 14:34:38 m3m0 maybe not /horizon 14:34:45 dashboard? 14:34:57 because /horizon/ is no longer part of the pathname nor the host 14:35:36 could you print what's your WEBROOT? 14:35:51 We can setting any WEBROOT 14:36:06 devstack set with /dashboard 14:36:44 and what's the full value? 14:38:20 http://172.16.140.31/dashboard 14:38:48 m3m0: i think use url_path is better to fix it 14:42:39 for me: url_path = /disaster_recovery/ 14:42:50 WEBROOT / 14:44:08 m3m0 yep, this two patch can solve the problem, but if using WEBROOT, get url_path should remove, and If we change the url, also should change this js 14:44:09 which I think should solve the issue 14:44:36 zhurong: so, I got confused, which one do you think is best? 14:46:23 m3m0 all depends you, :D. Both are OK, but using WEBROOT one should remove get url_path. 14:46:55 let's go for WEBROOT seems cleaner, do you want to update the patch? 14:47:41 zhurong: remove the url_path other patch 14:48:36 in the smae 14:52:09 guys can we discuss this in the #openstack-freezer channel? 14:52:14 and close this meeting? 14:52:26 Sure 14:52:46 #endmeeting