14:00:10 #startmeeting freezer 14:00:15 Meeting started Thu Jun 15 14:00:10 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is szaher. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:18 The meeting name has been set to 'freezer' 14:00:33 hi 14:00:39 jiaopengju: hi :) 14:00:44 Hello guys 14:01:05 hi szaher 14:01:05 Please take a look at the meeting agenda for today's meeting https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_meetings 14:01:09 tellesnobrega: hi 14:02:34 raliev vnogin are you around ? 14:03:35 szaher, hey, i'm here :) 14:03:45 raliev: nice to see you :) 14:04:10 trying to ping vnogin :) 14:04:39 Cool 14:04:40 hi guys 14:04:48 vnogin: Hey :) 14:05:49 guys, Please if you have any topics to be discussed put it here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/freezer_meetings 14:07:27 #topic add option to create swift client without using keystone 14:07:47 jiaopengju: Do you want to elaborate more on this ? 14:09:16 hi, szaher, I mean that create swift client without keystone, just use id, password and swift endpoint 14:10:41 jiaopengju: I think this should be possible. For now freezer only supports swift with keystone authentication 14:11:07 jiaopengju: do you have a blueprint for this ? 14:11:25 I have this idea is because that once in the weekly meeting, some users said they can not use freezer with EMC storage(swift interface) 14:12:06 ah, I remember that issue, but I think EMC storage is using keystone v1 ? 14:12:20 szaher: currently no, if this is needed, I would like to create this bp 14:12:29 yes 14:12:31 v1? 14:12:56 breton: I think that's what they said! 14:14:10 I guess without keystone, it will work 14:14:32 one of the two users had said 14:14:41 jiaopengju: I think we might need to have a blueprint that describes how this should work and how to differentiate between auth with keystone and without 14:15:13 szaher: Ok, I will do this job 14:15:55 jiaopengju: Thank you! 14:16:26 anyone wants to add anything around this ? 14:17:14 Ok, let's move on 14:17:19 #topic move to oslo.db 14:17:47 vnogin ralive I think dima is really busy nowadays 14:18:34 so I think I will be putting some effort on this 14:19:40 szaher: yep, Dima quite busy with internal tasks :( 14:20:25 vnogin: no problem, I will try to work on it so we can get something by the end of Pike hopefull 14:20:26 y 14:20:52 ok, will inform Dima about it 14:21:04 raliev: Thank You :) 14:21:31 szaher, np :) 14:21:45 raliev: Also the rsync engine v2 we didn't have it ready for Pike-2, Do you think it will be ready by Pike-3 or Pike-rc ? 14:23:05 tellesnobrega: breton: are you guys interested in freezer ? 14:23:15 szaher, actually I have time for working on freezer activities, hopefully I can finish it by pike-rc 14:23:47 very nice 14:25:38 I think that's what we have for today 14:27:12 anyone want to add or share anything ? 14:27:40 openstack ansible status? :) 14:28:31 the patch is ready and ansible guys did +1 on it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/469938/ 14:28:54 we're waiting for project-config guys to merge it 14:29:00 szaher, sorry, I was on the wrong channel, but we can always look and see how things can work together 14:29:31 szaher: cool ) 14:29:38 tellesnobrega: Sure :) np 14:29:55 vnogin: and this is for tempest as well https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472732/ 14:30:02 and still waiting 14:30:24 nice :) thx 14:31:06 hopefully we will get both merged soon and I will notify you 14:33:27 Ok Thank you guys 14:33:45 #endmeeting