04:00:05 <njohnston> #startmeeting fwaas
04:00:06 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Oct 12 04:00:05 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is njohnston. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
04:00:07 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
04:00:09 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'fwaas'
04:00:26 <chandanc> Hello All
04:00:30 <njohnston> Good morning
04:00:34 <SridarK> Hi All
04:00:37 <njohnston> or evening, as the case may be
04:00:41 <njohnston> #chair SridarK
04:00:42 <openstack> Current chairs: SridarK njohnston
04:01:04 <njohnston> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fwaas-meeting meeting agenda
04:01:19 <SridarK> njohnston: thanks as always
04:01:35 <njohnston> my pleasure
04:02:02 <SridarK> #topic neutron stadium requirements
04:02:44 <SridarK> #link  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/383881/
04:03:09 <njohnston> The meeting etherpad has a breakdown of all the places where we do not meet the stadium requirements as noted in Armando's assessment.
04:03:50 <SridarK> this  lists the pending requirements for compliance and stadium inclusion and njohnston has captured the shortfalls in the etherpad
04:04:00 <chandanc> ok
04:04:25 <SridarK> njohnston: & I also discussed this and we felt that we have a good chance to get this satisfied before the deadline of Nov 14
04:04:35 <SridarK> basically Ocata-1
04:05:16 <njohnston> There are some unowned items
04:05:26 <njohnston> And if youw ant to chip in with an item that has someone
04:05:36 <njohnston> someone's name, sync with them and split up the work
04:05:39 <njohnston> I am happy that Armando gave us credit for having "made quite a progress during the Newton cycle".
04:05:47 <SridarK> +1
04:06:04 <chandanc> great
04:06:12 <SarathMekala> Nice
04:06:44 <SridarK> Yes pls feel free to add urself and help out with any of these tasks
04:06:46 <njohnston> specifically we don't have anyone tagged to update the api-ref documentation to add info about fwaas v2 (item D2)
04:07:08 <njohnston> and we don't have anyone looking at multinode CI, which I will admit is a bit of a daunting task
04:07:57 <njohnston> never mind, Chandan is going to look at multinode CI!  I think the networking-ovn project may have an example of multinode that we can look at
04:08:08 <chandanc> ya just added
04:08:23 <chandanc> cool, will have a look
04:08:57 <SridarK> chandanc: great, i am not sure if there are some folks that have done this for our internal vendor CI - i will ask
04:09:20 <SridarK> and let u know if there is something useful
04:09:23 <chandanc> oh ok, that will be great help
04:11:25 <SridarK> i think this should be a very high priority objective for us
04:11:41 <chandanc> ok
04:11:52 <SridarK> njohnston: anything else to add on this topic
04:12:00 <njohnston> no sir
04:12:16 <SridarK> ok lets move on
04:12:24 <SridarK> #topic FWaaS v2
04:12:51 <SridarK> padkrish: sorry i could not connect with u today on the debugging
04:13:10 <SridarK> for the L2agent - db interaction
04:13:12 <padkrish> SridarK# It's ok....i was able to proceed
04:13:22 <SridarK> we can do this tomorrow if u still need somethings looked at
04:13:35 <padkrish> yes, we should..
04:13:42 <SridarK> but pls go ahead with any updates or things u want discuss
04:14:17 <padkrish> i sent another patch for l2 agent extension, wherein was able to test a simple case of handle_port notification
04:14:39 <padkrish> ofcourse, the driver calls are not tested for now :)
04:15:14 <padkrish> just a create port, which lands in fwaas extension, which does a RPC to plugin, retrieves the FWG attributes and stores it locally is tested
04:15:46 <njohnston> That is very promising :-)
04:15:56 <padkrish> in the plugin, i need a handler to retrieve FWG given a port...
04:15:57 <SridarK> padkrish: ok great, we can worry abt the driver later
04:16:10 <SridarK> padkrish: ok
04:16:23 <SridarK> i think i had a method for this
04:16:33 <padkrish> i had some problems, using the mixin...just got around it by directly calling the db calls for now :)...this is what SridarK was referring to
04:16:44 <padkrish> this will be in another patch
04:17:01 <SridarK> to ensure that before we associate a fwg we want to make sure there isn't one on it already
04:17:07 <SridarK> we may need to tweak that
04:17:14 <SridarK> we can certainly debug that
04:18:08 <SridarK> anything else to discuss on this ?
04:19:42 <padkrish> i also have this in the etherpad
04:19:42 <padkrish> SridarK# sure
04:19:42 <padkrish> then, i will push another patch for the FW attribute changes...for now, we will just use RPC and not versioned objects
04:19:43 <padkrish> nope, feel free to comment on the etherpad and patch :)
04:19:52 <SridarK> ok cool
04:19:56 <padkrish> sorry, got disconnected for a bit
04:20:00 <padkrish> that's all from me
04:20:07 <SridarK> thx padkrish
04:20:22 <SridarK> chandanc: SarathMekala: pls go ahead on the iptables
04:20:45 <chandanc> SridarK, the contrack patch is fixed now with the UTs
04:21:04 <SridarK> chandanc: yes saw that and nice and thx for the email
04:21:08 <SridarK> reaching out
04:21:11 <chandanc> I have pinged Kevin over mail, will ping him on IRC
04:21:23 <SridarK> yes that will be more effective
04:21:40 <SridarK> thx chandanc:
04:21:44 <chandanc> ya, i still have to fix the UTs on the IPTables manager patch
04:22:01 <chandanc> should be done this week,
04:22:21 <SarathMekala> that area has still some UTs pending fixes
04:22:24 <SridarK> ok cool, i know u guys probab also had local holidays over the last few days
04:22:32 <chandanc> but if anyone can help with getting some time from kevin, it will be great
04:23:06 <chandanc> also, if you are going to the Summit, please put a word to kevin, i will make sure that i ping him on IRC before that
04:23:15 <SridarK> chandanc: surely, try pinging him on IRC, he is usually around and very helpful
04:23:16 <njohnston> will do
04:23:53 <chandanc> yes, we had the big festivals going on last week
04:24:00 <chandanc> :)
04:24:14 <SridarK> thx chandanc SarathMekala
04:24:24 <chandanc> SridarK, will surely ping him
04:24:29 <SridarK> ok
04:24:49 <chandanc> I dont have much update otherwise
04:24:59 <SridarK> i think yushiro should be back end of the week and we can hopefully get the CLI patch moving again
04:25:03 <SarathMekala> no updates from my side either
04:25:22 <hoangcx> SridarK, He will be back from tomorrow
04:25:35 <SridarK> hoangcx: thx much for the heads up
04:25:40 <njohnston> +1
04:26:04 <SridarK> i think thats about all i had on v2
04:26:50 <SridarK> njohnston: pls go ahead on other topics u want to discuss
04:26:56 <njohnston> Thanks, SridarK
04:27:06 <reedip> hi
04:27:18 <SridarK> reedip: hi
04:27:19 <njohnston> #topic miscellany
04:27:22 <njohnston> hi reedip
04:27:32 <SridarK> reedip: yes i need to get to the review
04:27:56 <njohnston> First, I just wanted to note that we only have 19 weeks left in the Ocata cycle.
04:28:24 <njohnston> and I for one will be gone for two of them, in late December
04:28:32 <hoangcx> Including Christmas, thanksgiving, Summit...
04:28:52 <njohnston> so so we should keep our focus high and our expectations low for Ocata :-)
04:29:04 <SridarK> +1
04:29:35 <njohnston> In the neutron team meeting earlier today ihrachys mentioned that the theme for this release is "to make this cycle more calm, stabilizing things and completing features that were incomplete in Newton"
04:29:56 <njohnston> #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking/2016/networking.2016-10-11-14.01.log.html starting at 14:16:29
04:30:34 <SridarK_> i would echo, that for Ocata - our focus should be to put the wraps on few missing things and also do more testing
04:31:56 <njohnston> I think that is it for now from me, just wanted to pass those along
04:32:01 <SridarK_> while it is good to start planning for more features for P and do the ground work - realistically the time is quite tight
04:32:13 <SridarK_> and we can focus on stability
04:32:13 <njohnston> I will email the group with new kinds of testing as they become operative
04:32:23 <njohnston> per the stadium work
04:32:23 <SridarK_> sounds good
04:32:30 <chandanc> ok
04:32:52 <njohnston> oh, and you should be aware that there are now 2 tempest jobs - one that runs the tests against fwaas v1, and one that runs tests against fwaas v2
04:32:57 <SridarK_> reedip: i will get back to u on #link https://review.openstack.org/370731
04:33:03 <SridarK_> this needs more work
04:33:12 <reedip> SridarK_ no worries :)
04:33:21 <SridarK_> i am a bit swamped but have not forgotten
04:34:10 <SridarK_> i had nothing else major to say as well
04:34:49 <njohnston> sounds like we can close the meeting early
04:34:53 <njohnston> thanks all!
04:35:21 <SridarK_> yes i think so, unless anyone wants to discuss anything else
04:35:44 <chandanc> nothing from my side
04:35:54 <SridarK_> padkrish: we will sync tomorrow
04:36:10 <padkrish> sure SridarK#
04:36:31 <SridarK_> ok then looks like we can end early, thanks all for joining
04:36:52 <njohnston> #endmeeting