14:01:37 #startmeeting fwaas 14:01:38 Meeting started Thu Jan 18 14:01:37 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SridarK. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:39 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:41 The meeting name has been set to 'fwaas' 14:01:48 #chair yushiro xgerman_ 14:01:49 Current chairs: SridarK xgerman_ yushiro 14:03:19 #topic Queens 14:04:01 o/ 14:04:08 xgerman_: hi 14:04:12 hi 14:04:35 last week we went thru some patches that are prioritized 14:04:57 so I told Migueal that we are almost done, so they are closing the blueprint and the reminaing issues will be bugs 14:05:17 +1 14:05:17 xgerman_: ok yes makes sense 14:05:23 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/475183 14:06:30 I think we are good - just give me some time to run thru a final check then i can +A 14:06:49 yes, thanks SridarK 14:07:03 annp: anything else to discuss on this ? 14:08:38 ok lets move on to the next 14:08:59 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530450/ 14:09:20 I am good had a small nit on reno 14:09:25 Please go ahead. I'm online by mobile 14:09:33 annp: no worries 14:09:38 ok 14:09:46 thanks for your review :) 14:09:50 yushiro: so u think that is ok 14:09:58 Thanks 14:10:06 i just wanted to avoid any confusion on reno 14:10:19 SridarK, Yes. But I always not sure my grammar... 14:10:51 i think just using FWaaS rather than firewall on reno makes it more clear 14:11:34 SridarK, ah, yes. +1 14:11:34 +1 14:11:44 +1 14:11:57 always very helpful :) 14:12:29 annp: yushiro: ok once we correct that nit we can merge ? 14:12:45 since we still have time 14:12:54 but otherwise we are good 14:12:56 yeah, I expect we have about another week 14:12:57 SridarK, Yes. I think it's OK :) 14:13:14 ok great 14:13:35 (if I work with whoever cuts the release) 14:13:54 xgerman_, oh, sorry, i didn't do that.. 14:14:08 xgerman_: yes sounds good 14:14:31 Neutron usually cuts Wednesday… 14:14:46 OK 14:15:11 we shd be able to wrap by tomorrow 14:15:17 i think we also had #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527044/ 14:15:45 Yes. 14:15:55 supporting ipv6 for netlink 14:16:07 where are we on this - i have not gone thru this 14:17:02 annp: if u can respond from mobile or we can discuss on irc later 14:17:56 yushiro: did u have some inputs 14:18:08 Please discuss later on irc. 14:18:23 oh, good timing :) 14:18:32 annp: ok no worries during ur daytime we can 14:18:51 Thanks 14:19:03 annp: no problem at all 14:19:05 SridarK, I just tested this patch before and it worked. But not sure with the latest version. 14:19:14 yushiro: ok 14:20:07 next we had #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/480265/ 14:20:34 doude: pls go ahead 14:21:03 xgerman_: so from ur conversations with Miguel - u think we are too close ? 14:21:04 Hi all 14:21:22 hi doude 14:21:30 Miguel just wanted to close the blueprint… 14:21:35 hi doude 14:21:36 nothing much to say than last week 14:21:38 we cna still merge things 14:21:43 patch is ready for review 14:21:46 xgerman_: ok 14:21:49 doude: ok 14:22:02 do you think SridarK that could land for Queens? 14:22:21 doude: i am not sure - i think we will need to get some testing done 14:22:43 and I just I have to rebase it again :( 14:23:00 i have been going thru it 14:23:10 and I just realize I have to rebase it again :( 14:23:15 ok 14:23:36 doude: yes 14:23:46 yeah, your patch tends to be affected other patches.. I know.. 14:24:06 but I'd like to merge this patch until Q.. 14:24:11 worst case we will merge this as soon as we open for R 14:24:53 #link https://releases.openstack.org/rocky/schedule.html 14:25:06 doude: would that work or is it very critical to get this in ? I feel bad as u have been on this for a while and the PS is alway impacted by any change 14:26:20 I'm not sure Juniper will continue to contribute on a driver for FWaaS neutron extension if they cannot have it in for Queens 14:26:34 I've to see with mangment 14:26:39 Hi 14:26:45 Reedip here 14:26:49 ok, maybe we can get it in 14:26:54 doude: fair point 14:26:55 hi 14:27:06 +1 14:27:14 doude: do u think u can work thru some of the testing 14:27:31 or at least rebase it so we cna test tomorrow 14:27:39 what do you mean SridarK? 14:27:41 my concern is primarily on potential impact 14:27:52 +1 14:27:53 yes I can look on the rebase now 14:28:02 +1 14:28:06 great 14:28:08 we can always release and then backport bug fixes if it’s really close 14:28:08 doude: as xgerman_ says - rebase and then run more tests 14:28:11 don't know if it's a huge work 14:28:23 ok 14:28:38 on my sideI validate unit test and manual functional tests 14:28:49 and all OpenStack CI goes thru 14:28:59 doude: ok we can all work thru the testing as well 14:29:21 I don't know which more tests I can do 14:29:58 on the functional side, we will need to evaluate: 1) Basic L3 - CRUD and datapath. 2) Similarly for L2 14:30:24 tempest tests doesn't do that? 14:30:27 And ensure UI pieces are intact (which is low risk for ur changes IMHO) 14:30:47 doude: our tempest tests are still WIP 14:30:48 doude our tempest tests are pretty neglected 14:30:52 yes UI should not be impacted. The APi doesn't change 14:31:01 ok 14:31:12 we can set an etherpad and run thru some functional tests 14:32:14 we can use: 14:32:15 https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/fwaas-pluggable-backend-testing 14:32:31 sorry all, I'm bad condition now... I'll logout today. I'll see meeting log tomorrow. 14:33:00 Ok... 14:33:05 ok 14:33:11 so sorry. 14:33:17 Get well yushiro 14:33:22 doude: maybe u can also check in with ur mgmt 14:33:31 reedip: Thanks... 14:33:31 ok I'll 14:33:34 Bye all.. 14:33:35 but we can also plan for this after rebase 14:33:57 we can try and populate some of the tests 14:34:23 doude: we can sync on irc/email 14:34:39 sure 14:34:51 xgerman_: does that sound like a plan ? Anything else u would like to add 14:35:02 sounds good 14:35:09 good to me to 14:35:30 ok i think that was all the patches 14:35:52 SridarK: i had a small one 14:35:53 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535237/1 14:36:13 did not want to touch the onghoing patches 14:36:27 chandanc: sure pls go ahead 14:36:30 but if required i can push it in with any other 14:36:51 Just to make sure the OVS driver is initialized correctly 14:37:09 adds just 5 lines 14:37:18 chandanc: ok 14:37:38 I will add the team for review 14:37:48 i think we can keep it separate - will make it easier for doude on a potential rebase impact 14:38:02 ok 14:38:04 chandanc, regarding to your patch, I'd like make fwaas l2 agent extension compatible with OVS and linuxbridge 14:38:43 currently, Firewall L2 agent extension is compatible with OVS 14:38:46 annp, our initial check was jut to make sure SG is enabled, it did not check if SG is running on OVS 14:39:50 so even if SG is enabled with hybrid iptables driver, fwaas driver starts in coexistense mode 14:40:09 https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1743463 14:40:11 Launchpad bug 1743463 in neutron "linuxbridge scenario job fails with: "AttributeError: 'LinuxbridgeAgentExtensionAPI' object has no attribute 'request_int_br'"" [High,Confirmed] 14:41:03 annp_: this is not for linux bridge 14:41:52 yes. I understand your concerning but if we can make fwaas l2 agent extension compatible with linuxbrige and ovs it would be great 14:42:30 But It is ok if we do that in other patch 14:42:48 hmm, i would look at it, but not sure i can meet time lines. Lets discuss more on linux bridge 14:42:55 * tomorrow 14:43:03 chandanc, ok 14:43:31 chandanc, lets discuss on irc tomorrow :) 14:43:33 thanks 14:43:42 chandanc: annp_: sounds good 14:43:51 annp_: :) sure no problem 14:44:06 if it is more of a bug fix - we have more time 14:44:42 SridarK: yes it is more of bug fix, but a small one, else we can release note it 14:44:43 Édouard Thuleau proposed openstack/neutron-fwaas master: Implements a plugable backend driver https://review.openstack.org/480265 14:45:08 doude: ^^^ thanks 14:45:20 SridarK, xgerman_: rebase is done. It was trivial and git auto-merging it itself :) 14:45:34 I just pushed a new patch set 14:45:34 sweet 14:45:39 +1 14:45:47 it is likely u will have a few more with some of the last L2 PS that are about to merge 14:46:13 ok lets move on 14:46:37 #topic Documentation & Marketing :-) 14:46:48 xgerman_: thanks for raising the profile 14:46:51 :) 14:46:55 Nice topic 14:47:10 :-) 14:48:03 I am more on the marjeting side of things right now ;-) 14:48:04 Two things: 1) a nice youtube demo from chandanc https://youtu.be/6NoIvm0J1W8 higlighting L2 14:48:31 Thanks SridarK 14:48:37 2) Potential superuser article: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JMpJI4ypKwU-p7Dh1wGT_eVstD8QPX9xpmBxXXQifRc 14:48:42 from xgerman_ 14:49:21 xgerman_: i also added some edits and will continue to tweak but u had pretty much covered the most important things 14:49:29 xgerman_: SridarK i realized that l2 firewall sounds like mac filtering so updated the youtube 14:49:29 chandanc++, xgerman_++ 14:50:19 yeah, I was thinking of sending it on to the super user team soon 14:50:35 So request to team to look thru as well and suggest/make any edits 14:51:01 xgerman_: is there a deadline that we should be aware off ? 14:51:11 I don’t know off one 14:51:25 ok but we can try to get to final form in the next few days 14:51:46 +1 14:51:58 ok cool lets move on 14:52:05 #topic Dashboard 14:52:26 SarathMekala: amotoki: pls go ahead 14:52:57 I dont have any updates on dashboard for this week 14:53:01 SarathMekala: I think u were going thru some changes to ensure L2 support is in place from the Dashboard 14:53:04 ok 14:53:23 do u see any impact with L2 support 14:53:33 possibly with default FWG 14:53:40 last time I looked it had the support 14:53:50 ok 14:54:03 I just think we need to be a bit more user friendly - port id is really confusing 14:54:11 we shoudl show the server name, too 14:54:16 vm name 14:54:23 +1 14:54:27 +1 14:54:29 SridarK: I have a list of enhancements that need to be done... like the ones mentioned by xgerman_ 14:54:37 :-) 14:54:39 will start working on them 14:54:45 +1 14:54:49 yes that will defn make it more user friendly 14:54:53 thx SarathMekala 14:55:01 ok lets move on 14:55:10 #topic Open Discussion 14:55:46 SridarK, regarding to support ipv6 for netlink 14:55:50 So by tomorrow - we can get the few outstanding L2 patches in 14:55:57 annp_: yes pls go ahead 14:56:23 It's work in my local environment. 14:56:35 annp_: ok 14:56:54 and this is something we want to get in for Queens ? 14:57:15 yes. I think we can get it in Queen 14:57:25 annp_: ok 14:57:40 and doude: we will go thru the reviews on ur PS, but u will also check with ur mgmt 14:57:41 but Need your eyes for review :) 14:57:59 and we will all chip in with testing 14:58:48 doude: and u will be available in case we have regressions or any critical bugs that will need addressing during the RC phases ? 14:59:01 annp_: ok 14:59:12 yes SridarK 14:59:14 Neutron doesn;t do too many RCs 14:59:14 thanks 14:59:20 so RC-1 might be final 14:59:31 I'll ask management in few hours (no same tz) 14:59:31 Also on PTG, xgerman_ i think u and yushiro will be there 14:59:41 xgerman_: good point 14:59:45 doude: thx 14:59:49 yeah, still time to apply or travekl assistance :-) 15:00:14 the alternative will be to get this in as soon as R branch opens to minimize risk 15:00:23 doude: thx 15:00:31 xgerman_: ok 15:00:43 we can plan for pre and post mtg as well 15:00:58 i definitely wont be able to make it due to budget 15:01:04 we are at time 15:01:09 thanks all 15:01:12 thanks to all 15:01:15 thanks 15:01:18 thanks all 15:01:19 bye all O/ 15:01:21 bye 15:01:23 see you 15:01:24 #endmeeting