15:03:05 #startmeeting gantt 15:03:06 Meeting started Tue Nov 25 15:03:05 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:03:07 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:03:10 The meeting name has been set to 'gantt' 15:03:17 #chair n0ano 15:03:18 Current chairs: bauzas n0ano 15:03:27 roll call ? 15:03:30 \o 15:03:50 hello 15:04:10 sounds like some people hitted the daylight change 15:04:46 n0ano: around ? 15:05:11 I already discussed with jaypipes and he can't attend today due to a meeting conflict 15:05:40 (echo echo echooooo) 15:06:12 bauzas, its just you and me mate 15:06:25 awesome 15:06:49 PaulMurray: actually you and I are owners of K1 blueprints :) 15:07:02 PaulMurray: so we're good 15:07:06 let's start 15:07:10 bauzas, so do you want to update each othere? 15:07:15 should be quick 15:07:24 PaulMurray: will *try* ;) 15:07:38 bauzas, you go first 15:08:02 #topic Status on cleanup work 15:08:02 I'm interested in your updates, go on :) 15:08:13 hurrah, some fan around :) 15:08:22 go bauzas go! 15:08:25 so 15:08:29 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Gantt/kilo 15:08:41 ^above is the main entrypoint for considering progress 15:08:58 PaulMurray: feel free to amend it with your progress 15:09:14 so, we're having 4 BPs targeted for K1 15:09:47 it seems there is a mistake on the wikipage, because there are 2 entries for the same BP 15:10:04 that's my fault, I misunderstood the #3 item 15:10:11 so, let's iterate over there 15:10:32 bauzas, which is the duplicate 15:10:39 #item Convert get_available_resources() to return object 15:10:47 I have no status on that one 15:11:03 PaulMurray: item #3 and #5 15:11:07 bauzas, oh I get it #3 and #5 15:11:47 so, #info No status on Convert get_available_resources() to return object 15:11:50 bauzas, I can change it 15:11:56 PaulMurray: excellent 15:12:22 AFAIK, there is some progress about item #2 CPU pinning & huge page support 15:12:42 jaypipes and sahid are working on it 15:12:53 PaulMurray: any further info ? 15:13:03 that's still in my review queue 15:13:15 bauzas, there has been progress on #3 - lxsli is doing some work there on tests 15:13:23 I was going to #3 15:13:23 bauzas, and on the migrations 15:13:38 bauzas, sorry - go on 15:13:40 right, I was reviewing his patches 15:14:10 that's good effort, I'm just concerned about backporting all changes coming to test_resource_tracker before deleting it 15:14:47 PaulMurray: IIUC, lxsli was working on improving the test coverage, some tests were missinb 15:14:50 missing 15:14:58 bauzas, the idea is that the tests are really hard to understand 15:15:05 I know... :) 15:15:14 bauzas, so we are trying to go through repeating in the new version 15:15:31 I totally agree with the rationale, and actually the new version is pretty good 15:15:36 bauzas, we can drop old tests when we know we have coverage, we don't have to wait untill all are done 15:15:42 we just need to make sure everything is coverted 15:15:50 covered* 15:16:20 PaulMurray: I was just thinking about any changes in test_resource_tracker which would mean extra effort to test_tracker for providing it 15:16:26 bauzas, when tests for one thing, like migrations are done, the old tests can be dropped and that makes it a lot easier to get the migrations patch done...... 15:16:48 PaulMurray: agreed 15:16:51 bauzas, and repeat for each object 15:17:07 PaulMurray: makes sense 15:17:09 bauzas, so expect to see movement on objects themselves soon 15:17:13 ok, moving forward 15:17:22 #item Detach service from compute node 15:17:31 that's the one I'm working on 15:17:47 I had to modify some things wrt how data migrations are managed now 15:18:10 now, we can no longer provide data migrations within migration scripts 15:18:25 so, I have to carry some compatibility handling on the object side 15:19:00 here, that's quite ...interesting because the field I'm removing is actually used for searching and filtering against it 15:19:23 so, I'm currently dedicated to that, expecting to land a new iteration of the patch series by tomorrow 15:19:38 * bauzas likes to be a guinea pig 15:20:12 that's it for me 15:20:37 we can also talk about K2 BPs 15:21:06 I saw that jaypipes provided a new patchset for Add resource object models 15:21:13 still need to review it 15:21:17 I mean for the spec 15:21:31 ok - i'll look too 15:21:40 about Model request spec object 15:21:44 I'm committed to it 15:21:55 so the spec is having good reviews, I'll update it 15:22:22 basically, the plan is to provide both request_spec and filter_properties fields as part of the new RequestSpec object 15:22:43 and within the Scheduler, the old dicts will be repopulated based on these fields 15:23:02 so I need to update the spec by also mentioning the filter_properties fields as fields 15:23:13 that's on its way too 15:23:28 expecting to work on the implemention by end of this week 15:23:41 that's it for me 15:23:49 any questions about the BPs ? 15:23:56 or can we move to open discussion ? 15:24:06 go on 15:24:17 #topic Open Discussion 15:24:24 so, what's up ? :) 15:24:42 I have nothing to say on my side 15:25:02 nothing here - but I did respin https://review.openstack.org/#/c/133083/ 15:25:10 PaulMurray: yeah, saw it 15:25:18 I did it just now 15:25:19 PaulMurray: in my review backlog too 15:25:29 PaulMurray: ack 15:25:49 PaulMurray: I'm expecting to dedicate some time tomorrow about reviews 15:25:51 I realised I didn't need all those aggregates, so simplified it to just two that get used every time 15:25:55 I was quite busy the last 2 days 15:26:02 awesome 15:26:09 you mean in the tests ? 15:26:15 bauzas, that's cool - I can see you are active 15:26:45 bauzas, you'll see 15:26:53 PaulMurray: I like teasers 15:27:07 ok, closing the meeting, hurrah 15:27:34 n0ano will have to write 100 times "I have to learn what UTC means" :p 15:27:43 :) 15:27:48 #endmeeting