20:05:22 <markwash> #startmeeting glance
20:05:23 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Oct  3 20:05:22 2013 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is markwash. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
20:05:25 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
20:05:27 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
20:05:49 <markwash> I've got a (basically empty) agenda up on etherpad
20:05:52 <markwash> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/glance-team-meeting-agenda
20:06:05 <nikhil> i'm in
20:06:15 <markwash> flwang: zhiyan: around?
20:06:21 <zhiyan> sorry i'm late
20:06:24 <zhiyan> yes, i'm in
20:06:32 <markwash> cool
20:06:43 <markwash> reposting that link
20:06:45 <markwash> agenda here https://etherpad.openstack.org/glance-team-meeting-agenda
20:06:56 <markwash> I'll run through those real fast
20:06:57 <zhiyan> thanks
20:07:07 <markwash> second item first, iccha has nominated flwang and zhiyan for core
20:07:31 <markwash> I plan to vote +1 for both as soon as I get my mx records fixed :-)
20:07:59 <rosmaita> +1, +1
20:08:07 <zhiyan> thanks for you strong support!
20:08:17 <nikhil> sent +1 on ml from my side
20:08:35 <rosmaita> (i have been unsubscribed from ML, am fixing that now)
20:08:55 <zhiyan> thank you nikhil!
20:09:06 <nikhil> meaning you did not get my meeting invite rosmaita :(
20:09:27 <markwash> zhiyan: its going to be great having you on as core
20:09:35 <markwash> #topic rc1 is out!
20:09:55 <zhiyan> thanks markwash!
20:10:06 <rosmaita> nikhil: what meeting, did i miss it?
20:10:26 <nikhil> just desing sync up, tom at 14utc
20:10:33 <nikhil> design*
20:10:35 <rosmaita> k
20:10:45 <markwash> since rc1 is out, that means feature freeze no longer applies
20:10:53 <markwash> hurray
20:10:58 <nikhil> :)
20:11:03 <zhiyan> nikhil: cool, will check that mail
20:11:27 <nikhil> gr8 job , markwash. loved so many bp/bugs got in this rc!!
20:11:56 <nikhil> typing with one hand, 5guys fries are irresistible
20:12:12 <markwash> haha
20:12:20 <nikhil> :)
20:12:24 <markwash> nikhil: so the design syncup, on IRC tomorrow?
20:12:35 <nikhil> yes please
20:13:13 <markwash> #info async tasks design syncup Oct 4 1400 UTC in #openstack-glance
20:13:16 <markwash> does that look right? ^^
20:13:32 <nikhil> yeah , thanks markwash!
20:13:52 <markwash> on that note, does https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42817/ still apply?
20:14:12 * markwash looks for something to approve to celebrate feature freeze ending
20:14:13 * nikhil looks
20:15:03 <nikhil> markwash: yes, however there were some suggestions on that tabke from venkatesh
20:15:13 <nikhil> tables*
20:15:19 <markwash> gotcha
20:15:40 <markwash> can you link again to the patch we/I should review before the meeting tomorrow?
20:15:47 * nikhil is looking into venkatesh's irc win
20:15:55 <nikhil> ok sure
20:16:08 <nikhil> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46117/
20:16:12 <nikhil> markwash: ^^
20:16:13 * markwash has been distracted by rc1 bugs and unable to keep up with forward looking reviews
20:16:28 <nikhil> zhiyan: has some comments on it
20:16:40 <markwash> thanks for the link
20:16:42 <nikhil> would be great to have your thoughts as well
20:17:03 <nikhil> design wise specifically :)
20:17:44 * markwash nods
20:17:45 <zhiyan> nikhil: +1
20:17:47 <nikhil> making slight changes to it atm, should not differ by much though
20:18:26 <markwash> #topic glanceclient release plan
20:18:43 <markwash> its probably obvious to folks that there is not much of a plan in my head right now, just a general desire
20:19:00 <markwash> but I did pressure bcwaldon to advance the agenda on a 1.0 release this week
20:19:10 <markwash> hence we have some reviews
20:19:44 <zhiyan> cool, so we need review some critical patchs asap?
20:19:44 <markwash> whoops, false alarm
20:20:04 <markwash> he hasn't submitted them yet :-(
20:20:15 <zhiyan> i have some.
20:20:25 <markwash> zhiyan: I think the priority is normal at this point, unless someone knows some critical issues with glanceclient
20:20:32 <markwash> or are you talking about glance?
20:20:53 <zhiyan> no glanceclient
20:21:40 <zhiyan> except https://review.openstack.org/#/c/42741/ , i think https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48480/ , https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48481/ , and https://review.openstack.org/48285 is important.
20:22:34 <zhiyan> markwash: ok, i got it. just put them here, since i think they are important for client v1
20:22:48 <markwash> zhiyan: thanks
20:24:18 * markwash resists reviewing right now during the meeting
20:24:48 <markwash> regarding a general schedule
20:24:51 <zhiyan> markwash: ok that's all to me, next topi pls
20:24:57 <zhiyan> topic
20:25:07 <markwash> the question for me is do we need another 0.x release?
20:25:19 <markwash> it looks like some of these fixes could be great for that
20:25:34 <markwash> zhiyan: thoughts on that? ^^
20:25:55 <zhiyan> sorry i have no idea, but 0.12 is fine to me
20:25:59 <markwash> k
20:26:36 <markwash> that's about it for me this week
20:26:43 <markwash> #topic open discussion
20:26:56 <zhiyan> can you share bcwaldon's change with me for 1.0 release?
20:27:09 <markwash> zhiyan: probably not until he posts it
20:27:16 <markwash> zhiyan: but the idea is to switch to using requests
20:27:25 <markwash> and I think we can have another change to drop legacy support
20:28:27 <markwash> sorry for such a sparse agenda today, folks. I'm hoping the etherpad will open up the meeting to more and better discussion of importance and spur everyone's creativity in identifying important issues
20:29:46 <zhiyan> for open discussion, i have one markwash, but not sure it's ok for this topic
20:30:05 <markwash> got for it
20:30:09 <markwash> s/got/go/
20:30:15 <zhiyan> thanks.
20:31:13 <rosmaita> i have a dumb question for after zhiyan is done
20:31:28 <zhiyan> i'm not sure can i get you support on my one change, it's for make glance integrate nova with more efficient
20:31:42 <zhiyan> it's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/
20:32:53 <zhiyan> it's a old change to me, but it's important. the change make a framework to allow nova developer make some imagehandler plug-ins, to using more efficient approach to prepare base image.
20:32:58 <markwash> zhiyan: for sure, I will support that
20:33:10 <zhiyan> markwash: big thanks.
20:33:13 <markwash> I suppose it just needs review support?
20:33:46 <zhiyan> markwash: actually, yes, but want to make two part: 1. pls more folks review it to allow it landing.
20:36:07 <markwash> zhiyan: did you have another part you wanted to mention?
20:36:49 <zhiyan> 2. involve one imagehandler implement, i think RBD related one is a good candidate (sorry i can provide the link now, bad network)
20:37:25 <markwash> okay
20:37:33 <markwash> thanks for the heads up
20:37:44 <zhiyan> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/46879/
20:37:50 <markwash> I think its important for us to review that and bump it up the importance stack for nova core to consider
20:37:51 <zhiyan> got it
20:38:00 <markwash> so that multiple locations is actually used
20:38:18 <zhiyan> markwash: thanks again
20:38:29 <markwash> rosmaita: your question?
20:39:06 <rosmaita> was there a BP for the changes to support openstack-images-v2.1-json-patch
20:39:15 <rosmaita> or did it just happen?
20:39:46 <markwash> hmm
20:39:59 <rosmaita> (trying to save myself work in documenting)
20:40:14 <markwash> I think it might have just happened
20:40:20 <rosmaita> also, is the only way to set multiple locations via PATCH ?
20:40:33 <rosmaita> just happening is cool
20:41:24 <markwash> rosmaita: there was this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1102476
20:41:42 <zhiyan> rosmaita: i think for now we can only set multiple locations via PATCH
20:41:50 <markwash> zhiyan: +1
20:42:06 <rosmaita> what i thought, just checking, thanks
20:42:34 <markwash> okay, if that's all we got, let's leave it here. . and feel free to add items to the agenda for next week
20:42:50 <rosmaita> markwash: thanks for bug ref, exactly what i needed
20:42:52 <rosmaita> bye!
20:42:59 <zhiyan> thanks
20:43:04 <markwash> cheers
20:43:06 <markwash> #endmeeting