20:00:21 #startmeeting glance 20:00:22 Meeting started Thu Aug 21 20:00:21 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is arnaud. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:23 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:26 The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 20:00:45 hey! 20:00:50 o/ 20:00:54 o/ 20:01:18 nikhil___, 20:01:20 zhiyan, 20:01:33 flaper87|afk, 20:01:36 gokrokve, 20:02:07 I guess we can get started 20:02:15 o/ 20:02:22 here is the link of the agenda for today 20:02:26 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda 20:02:52 so Mark is still on vacation, if I remember correctly, I think he will be back next week 20:03:33 ok, so we can get started with the Murano proposal 20:03:38 #topic murano 20:04:10 so, we started the discussion last week, and I would like to take more time to make sure everybody is OK with the proposal 20:04:16 o/ 20:04:25 gokrokve, sent an email earlier this week 20:04:36 let me find the link :) 20:05:29 https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-dev%40lists.openstack.org/msg32768.html 20:05:51 so, the idea is to split the Murano project (to make it fit into existing programs) 20:06:15 the catalog program would include the API piece of Murano basically 20:08:11 I think this is good for Glance because 1. this will bring new people contributing to glance (artifact<->murano) 2. I think the split makes sense, and the API fits into the mission that we want to achieve 20:08:53 would API be new service endpoint? 20:08:57 yep 20:09:05 that would not be integrated with Glance 20:09:09 at least in the short term 20:09:41 wait, so the code would be in Glance however, the endpoint not? 20:09:48 is there a different between artifacy 20:09:53 maybe in the future, we can expect integration 20:10:02 but for now I think this that's the goal 20:10:08 arnaud: we have a enable flag basically, then? 20:10:10 repo and app catalog? 20:10:35 so, the murano API will consume the artifact api 20:10:46 sorry on phone today and keyboard not cooperating 20:11:11 in the short term, I don't think we need to worry much about the integration between glance and murano 20:11:22 they just share the same program "catalog" 20:11:49 unfortunately, gokrokve doesn't seem to be around 20:12:14 ok, we can discuss details on spec as well 20:12:14 so, I think the best way is to reply to his email if you have questions and/or concerns 20:12:36 sounds good 20:12:45 does this mean artifacts API is also separate? 20:12:50 this change needs to go through the governance repo and approved by the TC 20:13:04 no artifact API is in glance API V2 20:13:08 like metadefs 20:13:12 ok 20:14:13 #topic restrict download patch 20:14:22 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98737/ 20:14:43 abhishekk, do you want to say something about it? 20:14:53 we are waiting for Mark to review this patch, but would appreciate if others can give their feedback too. 20:15:24 ok tpatil_, sounds good to me. I tested the patch locally. from my perspective it is OK 20:15:40 also, it is one of our target for J-3 20:15:43 #link https://launchpad.net/glance/+milestone/juno-3 20:15:47 great!! 20:15:49 yes 20:15:55 so I am confident it will make it tpatil_ 20:16:01 Thanks 20:16:06 arnaud:thank you 20:16:25 let me update the LP BP to mark the status as Need reviews 20:18:17 next we have 20:18:22 #topic Use Launcher/ProcessLauncher to launch services 20:18:27 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110867/ 20:19:05 abhishekk, could you share a bit more what this is doing 20:19:11 and why we need that in J-3 20:19:56 arnaud:currently I have finished the integration and fixin of unittests 20:20:06 presently, glance api doesn't handle SIGHUP signal successfully so it cannot reload the updated configuration files. 20:20:11 do you have the links to the patches handy? 20:20:33 yes, 20:20:55 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/110012/ 20:21:26 thanks abhishekk 20:22:31 yes with this we can able to use features like reload configuration on SIGHUP, graceful shutdown etc 20:23:02 ok, let me look at the patch, I will discuss with Mark when he gets back 20:23:38 ok 20:23:54 sounds good, Thanks 20:24:04 the feature freeze is 20:24:49 September 4th 20:24:54 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule 20:25:14 yes with two weeks in hand 20:25:23 yep 20:25:25 what's the doc freeze date? 20:25:39 not sure tbh 20:25:41 and do the(se) DocImapct patches get affected? 20:25:50 ok 20:26:05 #action what's the doc freeze date 20:26:34 nikhil___: do you mean the string freeze? 20:27:12 #topic tasks 20:27:30 rosmaita: oh yes, that's the one 20:27:33 nikhil___, I think we are very close to get it merged very soon :) 20:27:40 arnaud: sounds good :D 20:27:59 gunna push up a PS later today!! 20:28:01 I let some comments (mostly minor things) 20:28:03 ok 20:28:22 and willing to take on any other related work as necessary we need to get in j3 20:28:30 like some more testing in glance 20:28:33 i think the string freeze is sept 11 20:28:45 rosmaita: thanks! that's a relief 20:28:54 ok thanks rosmaita! 20:29:22 arnaud: do we target tempest tests for tasks in kilo 1/2 ? 20:29:41 K-1 would be nice 20:29:56 and rather try to get glance client support in j3 20:30:00 as soon as we land your patch, I will focus on the task work 20:30:03 cool 20:30:24 the last bp in the list 20:30:29 actually 20:30:33 the 2 lasts :) 20:30:37 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/48850/ 20:30:46 needs rebase and some review (iiuc) 20:30:50 are 1. GPFS store 2. metadefs 20:31:25 nikhil___, let's merge first the glance side (your PS) + the task flow PS 20:31:32 and then we can merge the client, sounds good? 20:31:43 ok 20:32:08 #topic gpfs store 20:32:15 anyone has been looking at the patch? 20:32:43 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80182/ 20:33:41 I will try to reach zhiyan since this is an IBM thing 20:33:58 yea 20:34:13 the problem that I can see with that is glance.store 20:34:33 so, about glance.store, I started an email thread with flaper87|afk earlier this week 20:34:42 to try to build the PS gaps 20:35:21 so, I have been able to build the list for the vmware store, since I have been pushing all of the patches 20:35:34 but for the other stores, that's really hard to build the list 20:35:53 because all of the stores haven't been merged at the same time into glance.store 20:36:17 + some changes happened in glance.store 20:36:31 so far, we have this list 20:36:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/backports-glance.store 20:36:40 but that mostly contain vmware stuff 20:36:48 so, it's not really relevant 20:37:12 I am not sure what we want to do with it, flaper87|afk said that he is still working on the infra side 20:37:18 so we will see... 20:37:46 he was also waiting for Mark 20:37:56 ok 20:38:04 sounds good 20:38:33 ok, so last thing we would like to see in J3 20:38:36 #topic metadefs 20:39:25 so, I started to look at the DB patch (most of things are fairly mechanical from my pov) 20:39:44 I know the patches are regularly updated 20:39:58 TravT, could you share an quick update with us? 20:40:54 :) 20:41:08 nikhil___, have you been looking at the metadefs patches? 20:41:18 arnaud: :) 20:41:57 was going to ask if you got a chance to test it on devstack 20:42:08 we.re waiting for more re 20:42:16 so, tbh, I tried to execute what TravT sent 20:42:21 reviews 20:42:23 but it didn't work unfortunately 20:42:29 arnaud: my devstack was pre-occupied with tasks for the past few days however, can try this week 20:42:34 oh 20:42:52 glad you mentioned :) 20:43:00 yes, I can imagine nikhil___ 20:43:25 Can you send us the issues you encountered 20:43:25 I am going to look again at the DB layer tomorrow 20:43:54 lakshmiS, the script didn't work the first time somehow, and is not idempotent :) 20:43:55 arnaud: Sorry I stuck in a meeting 20:44:12 arnaud: But now I can talk :-) 20:44:23 it's failing to to create the patch in Horizon 20:44:35 I have to manually git commit -a 20:44:38 arnaud: is horizon part planned for j3? 20:44:59 nikhil___, I think that's the goal yes 20:45:06 in process of changes per last review 20:45:08 oh 20:45:11 Yeah the script was a quickly written. 20:45:35 sorry keep getting disconnected. 20:45:40 np TravT :) 20:46:07 the patches for horizon are approved for j3 20:46:13 ok 20:46:32 have gotten a couple reviews on one of them and addressed. 20:46:36 TravT, is there a spec for Horizon? 20:46:47 but are dependent on client 20:46:56 yeah. blurprints. 20:47:05 could you share the link here? 20:47:08 horizon doesn't use specs yet. 20:47:15 let me find them 20:47:21 ok ok 20:47:25 just a sec (on phone) 20:48:00 arnaud: metadefs on my list after tasks 20:48:16 sounds great nikhil___ 20:48:34 am guessing(hoping) that we do not have artifacts for j3 20:48:46 on this page #link https://launchpad.net/horizon/+milestone/juno-3 20:49:16 ok thanks TravT 20:49:37 any assigned to pawel skowron or me 20:50:58 arnaud: if you have problems with script send in email. I will addrezz 20:51:09 ok TravT 20:51:36 #topic open discussion 20:52:17 anyone? :) 20:52:23 arnaud: can we compile a list of reviews to be done for j3 so that they can be distributed amongst reviewers and priorotized? 20:52:34 yes 20:52:49 etherpad would be nice if gerrit does not support such a functionality 20:53:01 I will build that list 20:53:04 and send it to the ML 20:53:14 awesome 20:53:26 thank you! 20:53:31 np 20:53:42 ok, I think we can go back to reviews now :) 20:53:48 thanks 20:53:52 #endmeeting