14:00:10 <nikhil_k> #startmeeting Glance 14:00:10 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Apr 16 14:00:10 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is nikhil_k. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:11 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 14:00:13 <ativelkov> o/ 14:00:14 <kragniz> o/ 14:00:17 <bpoulos> o/ 14:00:17 <ajayaa> o/ 14:00:19 <pkoniszewski> o/ 14:00:24 <rosmaita> o/ 14:00:50 <nikhil_k> Cool, let's get started 14:00:54 <nikhil_k> #topic RC2 14:01:05 <lakshmiS> o/ 14:01:22 <mfedosin> o/ 14:01:40 <nikhil_k> #info ttx wanted us to release the same this week. I pointed a couple blockers for RC2 however, seems like only one would be able to get in now 14:01:50 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171022/ 14:02:10 <nikhil_k> Reviews on that would be appreciated as it would help everyone get moving. 14:02:26 <nikhil_k> #info RC2 planned to be last RC candidate for Kilo 14:02:53 <nikhil_k> Any reviews that we should be looking for and block RC2 on? 14:03:08 <lakshmiS> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/169813/1 14:03:08 <pkoniszewski> nikhil_k: i have one more thing there that may be possible RC candidate 14:03:36 <stevelle> o/ 14:03:41 <lakshmiS> nikhil_k 169813 is required for interactions from horizon. 14:03:51 <sabari> o/ 14:03:52 <nikhil_k> pkoniszewski: please give me the link so that I can put it where people can look at it at their convenience 14:03:55 <pkoniszewski> during work on functional tests for metadefs i found regression in tags 14:04:06 <pkoniszewski> it is now part of functional tests, but i will split it ASAP 14:04:10 <pkoniszewski> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125010/23/glance/db/sqlalchemy/metadata.py 14:05:22 <nikhil_k> btw, I am adding them to 14:05:23 <nikhil_k> https://trello.com/c/CoZ9g13d/45-kilo-rc2 14:05:34 <nikhil_k> to help reviewers find them easily 14:06:12 <nikhil_k> pkoniszewski: creating a separate for RC2 would be great 14:06:29 <nikhil_k> as backporting the tests might be asking for too much 14:06:30 <pkoniszewski> sure, I'll do it in few minutes and provide link to that 14:06:41 <nikhil_k> appreciate that pkoniszewski 14:07:12 <nikhil_k> Any other concerns about RCs? Should we ask for RC3? 14:07:36 <nikhil_k> mclaren: hi 14:07:39 <nikhil_k> mclaren: you just missed my question 14:07:40 <nikhil_k> Any other concerns about RCs? Should we ask for RC3? 14:07:42 <jokke_> o/ 14:07:49 <pkoniszewski> nikhil_k: do I need to register a bug on launchpad or is review enough? 14:07:59 <mclaren> nikhil_k: for the server? Nothing comes to mind 14:08:04 <nikhil_k> please register so that ttx can keep track of the same 14:08:09 <pkoniszewski> ok 14:08:18 <nikhil_k> mclaren: thanks 14:09:03 <jokke_> nikhil_k: I don't think there is anything critical enough atm. warranting RC3 14:09:16 <nikhil_k> jokke_: sounds great 14:09:30 <nikhil_k> #info We've started Liberty development. 14:09:33 <nikhil_k> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/171227/ 14:10:02 <jokke_> nikhil_k: I approved one patch to a bug I tagged as rc-potential ... would be nice to have in RC2 (that was yesterday I think) 14:10:33 <nikhil_k> Any changes after the RC2 is released would be evaluated to be backported as per the criterion on 14:10:36 <nikhil_k> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch 14:10:47 <nikhil_k> jokke_: can you please give a link? 14:11:46 <nikhil_k> Ok, while we wait for the link. Let's start discussion on the next topic. 14:11:54 <nikhil_k> #topic new client release/client stable branch 14:12:15 <nikhil_k> was that you jokke_ ? 14:12:17 <jokke_> nikhil_k: forget about it 14:12:25 <nikhil_k> ok 14:12:27 <jokke_> the bug mentioned 14:12:34 <mclaren> I can talk through the client stuff? 14:12:44 <jokke_> mclaren: please 14:12:59 <nikhil_k> yes please 14:13:27 <mclaren> There are a few fixes that I think are critical enough for both 1) a new client release and 2) putting that version into the global requirements for kilo 14:13:48 <mclaren> I've a few reviews up on the stable branch if folks have time to have a quick look 14:14:11 <mclaren> this is probably highest priority https://review.openstack.org/#/c/174293/ 14:14:30 <mclaren> Chatting with ttx he seemed to suggest 14:14:56 <mclaren> that updating global requirements to >=0.17.1 once it's out would be ok 14:15:15 <mclaren> Are we ok time-wise to get that in do people think? 14:15:42 <jokke_> mclaren: please https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/StableBranch#Proposing_Fixes we need the cherry-picked-from tags on the commit messages 14:16:07 <mclaren> (The context here is that in kilo nova/glance with https can't access glance to boot images etc.) 14:16:27 <nikhil_k> So, just to add some more context. We have until April 30th to work on release candidates. 14:16:49 <nikhil_k> However, we want to be able to get that sooner than later. 14:17:06 <nikhil_k> So, I would support relasing a new client version given: 14:17:24 <nikhil_k> 1. We've all the fixes needed for the same merged soon 14:17:35 <mclaren> jokke_: ok I can add that. It's a day for commit messages ;-) 14:17:42 <nikhil_k> 2. We release it before next week'e meeting 14:18:16 <mclaren> nikhil_k: thanks. 14:18:38 <jokke_> mclaren: so it seems ... the stable branches are quite more strict on those, so have a quick look through that wiki page and let me know when ready. 14:19:34 <mclaren> nikhil_k: once the client is out, is it ok to just go ahead and submit a patch to global requirements? 14:19:48 <mclaren> or is there more process this close to release? 14:20:03 <nikhil_k> mclaren: I think a WIP to global requirements right away wouldn't be so bad 14:20:13 <mclaren> nikhil_k: sure, good idea 14:20:19 <jokke_> ++ 14:20:44 <mclaren> anyone know if there is a stable/kilo branch for global requirements yet? 14:21:11 <jokke_> mclaren: yes there is 14:21:31 <mclaren> ok thanks 14:21:54 <flaper87> o/ 14:21:57 <mclaren> I'll put a WIP there aswell to give people a heads up 14:22:12 <nikhil_k> We good on this topic? 14:22:14 <jokke_> the problem is that it might come in time for our release, but does anyone has any idea how Nova is doing? 14:22:41 <jokke_> Are they gonna have RC still where that global requirements lands in time? 14:23:19 <nikhil_k> That's a good point and prolly needs to be raised on ML with [all] tag 14:23:46 <mclaren> yeah, cinder also need to pick it up for example 14:23:48 <jokke_> if not that's shame, fortunately it will only affect on upgrades from systems having those faulty versions installed 14:24:07 <flaper87> Have you guys already talked about this review? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173646/ 14:24:08 <jokke_> or actually having 17.0 installed 14:24:10 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173646/ 14:24:24 <kragniz> flaper87: not yet 14:24:27 <flaper87> It's flwang's patch for /CURRENT/SUPPORTED 14:24:31 * flaper87 shuts up and waits 14:24:32 <nikhil_k> mclaren: jokke_ may be we can put a SecurityImpact tag there 14:24:38 <nikhil_k> ? 14:24:54 <mclaren> nikhil_k: are you ok to send a mail once the global requirements change lands? 14:25:12 <nikhil_k> That gets noticed and systems would be prudently upgraded with latest version 14:25:40 <nikhil_k> mclaren: yes. Can we please co-ordinate this offline, may be on email to be in sync with reviews? 14:25:47 <jokke_> nikhil_k: it's not really a security impact per se ... 14:25:55 <mclaren> nikhil_k: sounds good 14:26:33 <jokke_> I'd warn all projects already before we have anything landing that the client will have critical patch release coming ... I can do that if needed 14:26:40 <nikhil_k> jokke_: yeah, I'm just trying to ensure that people pick it up. The alternative does not sound secure ? 14:26:59 <mclaren> There should be enough time between when testing of RCs start to be able to work through any client issues found 14:27:27 <jokke_> nikhil_k: well the alternative needs active action ... unfortunately we just blow stuff atm. 14:27:35 <nikhil_k> ok, if this does not get enough traction by Tuesday I will have achat in the Cross Project meeting 14:27:47 <jokke_> nikhil_k: sounds good ... 14:28:24 <jokke_> #action jokke_ Will send e-mail to mailing list warning upcoming python-glanceclient stable 0.17.1 14:28:40 <mclaren> nikhil_k: nova can't boot a vm etc if https is enabled in glance 14:28:56 <mclaren> no it's less a security thing and more a not-working thing 14:29:00 <mclaren> no->so 14:29:01 <flaper87> mclaren: I'll review those patches 14:29:15 <mclaren> thanks flaper87 14:30:08 <nikhil_k> mclaren: heh, yeah. However, getting attention from people at this busy time might call for using Security tag 14:30:17 <kragniz> nikhil_k: I don't think we should add SecurityImpact just to gain attention 14:30:21 <nikhil_k> flaper87: great pointer. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173646/ 14:30:33 <nikhil_k> kragniz: ok, do you mind pushing this through then? 14:30:41 * flaper87 is so happy to have stable/kilo for glanceclient 14:30:43 <mclaren> well it's a form of denial of service I guess, but yeah security tag might confuse 14:30:45 <nikhil_k> and talk to all the people who do not want a release? 14:30:59 * mclaren also things stable is best thing ever 14:31:26 <kragniz> nikhil_k: a mail to -dev saying that nova is broken with the current release should be enough 14:31:33 <nikhil_k> I will not use that tag unless someone in the release team is okay with it 14:31:43 <flaper87> just put "nova is broken" in the subject 14:31:57 <flaper87> Even the Angels will reply 14:32:04 <nikhil_k> Well, "broken conditionally" 14:32:07 <mclaren> well 'glanceclient is broken with https -- affects nova' is closer 14:32:15 <nikhil_k> == mclaren 14:32:27 <mclaren> nova and cinder etc 14:32:31 <flaper87> ok, just put nova in the subject 14:32:37 <nikhil_k> basically, [all] 14:32:49 <nikhil_k> Because ironic might be affected too 14:33:03 <flaper87> ops, got disconnected 14:33:07 <kragniz> nikhil_k: we always forget about ironic 14:33:27 <nikhil_k> heh 14:33:48 <mclaren> ok, sounds like we have a plan :-) 14:34:52 <jokke_> [all][stable][glance} went out :) 14:35:38 <nikhil_k> I've added this 14:35:40 <nikhil_k> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/173646/ 14:35:47 <nikhil_k> as RC2 blocker 14:35:55 <flaper87> +2 14:36:15 <flaper87> I'm ready to +2 and ping the doc team about it 14:36:32 <flaper87> Or we can add the flags and ninja-approve 14:36:42 <nikhil_k> Thanks, we should fix the commit message. It seems important change that all the operators should be aware about 14:36:52 <mclaren> I think there's a cherry-picked from missing in the commit msg. 14:36:56 <mclaren> Let me add that 14:37:02 <flaper87> ok, I can add those flags 14:37:05 <flaper87> mclaren: you do it 14:37:07 <flaper87> :D 14:37:27 <jokke_> the bug number should be flagged as well 14:37:38 <flaper87> we also need the backport of that patch 14:38:05 <nikhil_k> yes, we need a bug, need a backport and change in the commit message 14:38:40 <nikhil_k> But we have time with 2 other reviews blocking RC2 so we should have enough time to do this right 14:39:04 <jokke_> :) 14:39:29 <flaper87> I can keep an eye on this and stuart's patches 14:39:49 <nikhil_k> Thanks all for the hard work and being proactive on the release 14:39:59 <nikhil_k> I will move on for the next topic 14:40:10 <nikhil_k> #topic Election reminder 14:40:15 <mclaren> flaper87 provides adult supervision 14:40:19 <nikhil_k> #info Anyone that voted in the 'first' election needs to recast their vote 14:40:30 <nikhil_k> mclaren: was that you or jokke_ ? Any thing else? 14:40:57 <mclaren> nikhil_k: me. I hadn't realised that my first vote was lost until kragniz pointed it out 14:41:10 <nikhil_k> ah ha, too many emails? 14:41:14 <mclaren> that's it. Just wanted folks to know 14:41:30 <mclaren> 200,000 in my inbox as we speak :-) 14:41:35 <nikhil_k> Also, if you have multiple emails in gerrit this might have been confusing 14:42:16 <nikhil_k> The link to vote should have come in the preferred email (set in gerrit) 14:42:30 <nikhil_k> Moving on.. 14:43:00 <nikhil_k> #topic Open Discussion 14:43:53 <nikhil_k> Vancouver weather looks good http://forecast.io/#/f/49.2473,-123.1069 14:44:06 <sabari> I saw stable/kilo for glance_store yest, so we open for L right ? 14:44:20 <jokke_> what's our session planning status? 14:44:27 <mclaren> good point 14:44:34 <wokuma> Since we have liberty development, how do i get attention back on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/138612/ ? 14:44:53 <flaper87> I haven't seen many proposals on the etherpad 14:45:01 <kragniz> jokke_: there's an etherpad lurking https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics 14:45:04 <flaper87> which made me think I was looking at the wrong etherpad but I was not 14:45:10 <nikhil_k> wokuma: just answered your question sabari 14:45:33 <nikhil_k> thanks for pointing that link kragniz 14:45:56 <kragniz> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-glance-summit-topics 14:46:16 <nikhil_k> Please do find other links at: 14:46:16 <nikhil_k> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Design_Summit/Planning 14:46:58 <jokke_> ok so Call to action ... people lets get the topics up! 14:47:16 <mclaren> would it be useful to talk about the scope of the project at the summit? 14:47:23 <jokke_> ++ 14:47:24 <nikhil_k> wokuma: Please remind us outside of the meeting too to get that reviwed. However, it might be on down on the priority list right now with more important things needing attention for RC2. 14:47:34 <flaper87> mclaren: proposa a session :) 14:47:39 <flaper87> propose* 14:47:41 <flaper87> I'm interested 14:47:51 <mclaren> ok I'll do that 14:47:51 <wokuma> nikhil_k: ok, thx 14:48:19 <nikhil_k> mclaren: I would strongly encourage that however, at the same time we need to have priority meeting before the summit to decide on the topics 14:48:48 <mclaren> nikhil_k: sure, I'll just put it on the etherpad 14:48:52 <nikhil_k> Kind of similar to what we did in Kilo 14:49:28 <flaper87> thanks everyone! 14:49:35 <jokke_> I'd like to have proposals on the etherpad so when we know which one of you guys is gonna be our fearless leader to Liberty we can start seriously planning the sessions ;) 14:49:53 <flaper87> ++ 14:50:03 <flaper87> LOL 14:50:03 <rosmaita> mclaren: +1 to scope of glance session 14:50:19 <pkoniszewski> nikhil_k: since liberty specs dir is already merged, can you remove -2 from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/151194/ ? 14:50:51 <nikhil_k> done. thanks pkoniszewski 14:50:55 <pkoniszewski> thanks! 14:51:13 <nikhil_k> I should prolly try to find all the reviews that are currently blocked on my -2 14:51:32 <jokke_> nikhil_k: you have quite a few of them :D 14:51:40 <nikhil_k> heh 14:52:57 <nikhil_k> Thanks all! 14:53:02 <jokke_> anything else? 14:53:06 <jokke_> Thanks! 14:53:09 * flaper87 has gummy bears 14:53:12 <kragniz> nikhil_k: thanks 14:53:14 <flaper87> anyone ? 14:53:21 * flaper87 sends gummy bears to everyone 14:53:29 <nikhil_k> #endmeeting