14:00:22 <flaper87> #startmeeting Glance
14:00:22 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Feb 11 14:00:22 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is flaper87. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:00:26 <nikhil> o/
14:00:31 <rosmaita> o/
14:00:37 <dshakhray> o/
14:00:39 <mfedosin> o/
14:01:01 <flaper87> hey folks
14:01:11 <flaper87> hope you all had a great week
14:01:22 <flaper87> #topic Agenda
14:01:24 <flaper87> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:01:27 <kairat_> o/
14:01:30 <ninag> o/
14:01:32 <flaper87> You can find our agenda there
14:01:47 <flaper87> #topic Updates Glare
14:01:51 <flaper87> mfedosin: ninag
14:01:54 <flaper87> ops
14:01:55 <flaper87> mfedosin: nikhil
14:01:57 <flaper87> :D
14:02:09 <mfedosin> it happened
14:02:12 <mfedosin> finally
14:02:28 <mfedosin> Glare is officially here
14:02:45 <mfedosin> we merged it last night
14:02:55 <jokke_> o/
14:03:06 <flaper87> nnnnnnice
14:03:08 <flaper87> well done folks
14:03:12 <mfedosin> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255274/
14:03:13 <flaper87> thanks to everyone for the reviews
14:03:24 <flaper87> Now, let's get the spec together and prepare for Newton
14:03:26 <mfedosin> thanks everyone who helped there
14:03:47 <mfedosin> yes, we began to work on the spec with kairat and nikhil
14:04:01 <flaper87> cool. Do you have an ETA ?
14:04:13 <mfedosin> I present a small draft of api on the latest glare meeting
14:04:21 <mfedosin> definitely before summit
14:04:34 <flaper87> I'd suggest for it to be ready by M-3
14:04:42 <flaper87> That gives enough time for discussions to happen before the summit
14:04:53 <mfedosin> but actually it must be done before 23th of February
14:04:53 <flaper87> so that summit can be used to polish some other things
14:05:22 <flaper87> coolio
14:05:24 <flaper87> anything else?
14:05:28 <mfedosin> yes
14:05:32 <mfedosin> one question
14:05:42 <mfedosin> I wrote a small doc about Glare
14:05:59 <mfedosin> and I wonder if we can merge it in Glance docs
14:06:17 <mfedosin> it's like FAQ about Glare
14:06:24 <flaper87> Is that the doc you shared at the virtual mid cycle?
14:06:33 <flaper87> I don't think people would be mad for having more docs
14:06:35 <flaper87> :P
14:06:41 <flaper87> (or some docs)
14:06:45 * flaper87 ducks
14:07:09 <mfedosin> I didn't share anything there :)
14:07:15 <mfedosin> just a small pic
14:07:20 <flaper87> mfedosin: mmh, you did show us a diagram
14:07:22 <nikhil> it was shared in the artifacts meeting
14:07:23 <flaper87> oh ok
14:07:44 <rosmaita> mfedosin: the doc team wants each project to take more responsibility, so adding a glare faq sounds like a great idea
14:07:44 <mfedosin> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D4Hik0-XNqwi43gxtybCs9-fMqh5IAIu8CHB33e46OQ/edit
14:07:46 <mfedosin> this one
14:07:47 <flaper87> anyway, I think it's fine to have more docs. Let's review all that on gerrit
14:08:02 <flaper87> #link https://docs.google.com/document/d/1D4Hik0-XNqwi43gxtybCs9-fMqh5IAIu8CHB33e46OQ/edit
14:08:12 <mfedosin> Olena will help me with that
14:08:16 <nikhil> I guess the ques from mfedosin and I is
14:08:25 <nikhil> can we propose it against glance source tree?
14:08:48 <nikhil> or would people mind it?
14:08:50 <mfedosin> or it should go to OpenStack wiki
14:09:00 <flaper87> I don't think there's an issue with that. Glare is part of Glance's source. As long as it's in rst format, I think it's ok
14:09:10 <nikhil> I know searchlight project has awesome in tree docs
14:09:12 <mfedosin> flaper87: wow
14:09:24 <nikhil> cool
14:09:25 <mfedosin> thank you for that
14:09:40 <flaper87> coolio
14:09:54 <flaper87> anything else?
14:10:03 <mfedosin> nothing from my side
14:10:04 <rosmaita> i think stuff in the wiki gets ignored, i vote for putting it in with the glance docs
14:10:29 <flaper87> plus, it's hard to update the wiki
14:10:38 <flaper87> and the session lasts less than my hopes for a better world
14:11:00 <flaper87> and my hopes for a better world don't last long.... like nothing
14:11:03 <flaper87> anyway
14:11:10 * flaper87 should stop saying dumb stuff
14:11:14 <flaper87> moving on
14:11:31 <flaper87> #topic Updates Nova v2 -> v1 (it's not a typo)
14:11:41 <mfedosin> oh
14:11:48 <mfedosin> it's painful
14:11:51 <flaper87> :(
14:11:54 <flaper87> yeah
14:11:58 <mfedosin> but we have good news and bad news
14:12:07 <mfedosin> good news are:
14:12:27 * nikhil chuckles on mfedosin's style of updates
14:12:27 <mfedosin> I spent three sleepless night, but made it work
14:12:35 <rosmaita> hooray!
14:12:41 <jokke_> \o/
14:12:48 <mfedosin> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/259097/
14:12:53 <mfedosin> everything
14:13:08 <mfedosin> xen plugin, ceph...
14:13:23 <mfedosin> Also I got a lot of comments from Bob Ball
14:13:31 <mfedosin> they were really useful
14:13:46 <flaper87> mfedosin: man, you better be in Austin because I'm buying you drinks
14:13:47 <mfedosin> I hope he likes the patch
14:14:20 <mfedosin> I'll be prepare :)
14:14:35 <mfedosin> but also there is bad news:
14:14:45 <mfedosin> John -2'ed the patches
14:14:48 <flaper87> mfedosin: more updates ?
14:14:56 <flaper87> or are you just dropping the bad news on me
14:14:57 <mclaren> I saw that
14:14:57 <mfedosin> because they are non-priority
14:14:59 <flaper87> ?
14:15:01 <flaper87> :P
14:15:07 <flaper87> oh, my IRC is lagging
14:15:09 <flaper87> :(
14:15:24 <mfedosin> I'm going to send a message in ML
14:15:33 <rosmaita> "Sorry, we have now hit the Non-Priority Feature Freeze for Mitaka. For more details please see: http://docs.openstack.org/releases/schedules/mitaka.html#m-nova-npff and http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/process.html#non-priority-feature-freeze"
14:15:47 <mfedosin> because afais too many people want it
14:15:54 <flaper87> so, FWIW, this work is not a priority for Nova but it is for Glance
14:15:59 <mclaren> I'd certainly support trying to get it in
14:15:59 <rosmaita> +1
14:16:08 <jokke_> How about we make them priority and makr v1 deprecated now ... like literally within this meeting?
14:16:10 <flaper87> It's been hard and I won't hide I'm supper annoyed by this not going in
14:16:50 <flaper87> Let's have another discussion on the ML and see what can be done
14:16:55 <mfedosin> As I said even if it's a priority for Nova, it's a priority for whole OpenStack
14:17:04 <flaper87> mfedosin: I do agree with you
14:17:13 <flaper87> like super fully agree
14:17:19 <mfedosin> *not a priority for Nova
14:17:26 <jokke_> ++
14:17:35 <mfedosin> we all work for OS
14:17:51 <mfedosin> and it's better to collaborate to make it better
14:18:02 <flaper87> so, let's get that email out but I'd recommend not getting the hopes very high
14:18:19 <mfedosin> I know, but let's try to do it
14:18:24 <mclaren> can we qualify the risk to some degree? Is it fairly low risk?
14:18:32 <flaper87> mclaren: what risk?
14:18:52 <mclaren> I guess nova don't want to risk taking new changes -- so can we convince them it's low risk?
14:19:04 <mfedosin> at least we can set GLANCE_VER = 1
14:19:11 <mclaren> yeah, for example
14:19:18 <mfedosin> and it will be the old workflow
14:19:20 <rosmaita> "For things that are very close to merging, it’s possible it might get an exception for one week after the freeze date, given the patches get enough +2s from the core team to get the code merged. But we expect this list to be zero, if everything goes to plan"
14:19:31 <flaper87> It's not just a matter of risks, TBH.
14:19:37 <nikhil> I doubt if John would block this
14:19:46 <nikhil> I recommend talking to him first
14:19:48 <flaper87> The motivations I've heard are risk, design, timing
14:19:50 <nikhil> as no one else is blocking it
14:20:14 <nikhil> I think -2 is merely a follow on his Nova exception policy
14:20:15 <flaper87> nikhil: I've been talking to John. The block comes from an agreement with the rest of the team
14:20:28 <nikhil> ah k
14:20:31 <flaper87> The freeze happened 2 weeks ago, he actually gave extra time for this
14:21:00 <nikhil> oh and the extra week discussed with sean wasn't considered by the rest then?
14:21:19 <nikhil> anyways, just dumping my thoughts here...prolly we don't need to discuss this
14:21:58 <rosmaita> i'd suggest mike and flavio coordinate on what goes out to the ML
14:22:00 <flaper87> Anyway, let's wait for mfedosin's email and see what the result of the discussion is
14:22:10 <nikhil> I am sure the rest of the OS wants v2 to become default in M
14:22:30 <flaper87> I don't want us to just waste time pointing fingers on the ML but rather evaluating how this can go in in Mitaka
14:22:37 <nikhil> real default (whatever that means)
14:22:40 <flaper87> The plan was *NEVER* for this to be perfect in mitaka
14:22:52 <flaper87> This was agreed upon back in Tokyo (or after tokyo)
14:23:13 <mfedosin> flaper87: also you have a spec merged
14:23:19 <flaper87> do I?
14:23:22 <flaper87> oh right
14:23:24 <flaper87> I do
14:23:26 <flaper87> :D
14:23:28 <flaper87> anyway
14:23:28 <mfedosin> =P
14:23:30 <flaper87> Let's move on
14:23:49 <flaper87> #topic Cross-project updates
14:23:50 <flaper87> nikhil: ?
14:23:53 <flaper87> anything ?
14:23:57 <nikhil> hey
14:24:02 <nikhil> yeah, that's me
14:24:10 <nikhil> there are 2 (semi) updates
14:24:26 <nikhil> 1. Glance & subsequent discussion on (nested) quotas
14:24:46 <nikhil> SO, there are about 5 or so projects with quotas implemented already
14:25:01 <nikhil> only cinder has nested quota work done fairly well
14:25:36 <nikhil> Most of the feedback I got was go ahead with simple quota first and if you don't have HMT the move from simple -> nested won't be that tricky given we keep stuff configurable
14:25:50 <nikhil> But I am still evaluating the technical ramifications
14:26:23 <nikhil> The first step I am taking is work on a cross prj oslo.quotas spec with vilobhm
14:26:54 <nikhil> we are hopeful to get some feedback on this; given it's fresh I want to bring that spec up in a next to next week's mtg
14:27:00 <nikhil> I will update more on this topic then
14:27:18 <ninag> nikhil: are you working on a corss prj spec for simple or nested quotas?
14:27:20 <nikhil> mtg == xprj mtg and following glance one
14:27:45 <flaper87> that sounds awesome. I guess simple quotas for now it is
14:27:53 <nikhil> ninag: it's a complete quota spec. I think not all projects have implemented even simple so it will start with that
14:27:57 <flaper87> ninag: nikhil did you coordinate with flwang ?
14:28:05 <nikhil> ninag: I will share details with you offline
14:28:12 <nikhil> flaper87: yep
14:28:17 <ninag> nikhil: sounds good..i have some concerns and ideas
14:28:29 <nikhil> ninag: I can def imaging
14:28:34 <nikhil> imagine**
14:28:46 <rosmaita> k
14:28:55 * nikhil == typos with cold fingers
14:28:57 <flaper87> the second update? :D
14:29:04 <nikhil> 2. Query config
14:29:15 <nikhil> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/242852
14:29:20 <nikhil> There was some discussion on this
14:29:43 <nikhil> most to see if this sort of thing is useful and should the x-prjs go with yes or no
14:29:48 <nikhil> mostly*
14:30:19 <nikhil> I can see the use of it in some projects but from glance perspective it seemed rather unnecessary
14:30:35 <nikhil> it's still under discussion so open for questions here
14:30:42 <flaper87> right
14:30:53 <flaper87> I agree it's not super useful for us
14:30:59 <flaper87> I haven't read that spec
14:31:02 <flaper87> but I will catch up
14:31:15 <nikhil> oh he abandoned it yday, late refresh oops
14:31:34 <nikhil> so yeah, mostly noop from us
14:31:47 <flaper87> ok
14:32:04 <flaper87> Anything else? Questions from folks? Things that should be raised in the next meeting?
14:32:28 <nikhil> Next x-prj mtg you mean?
14:32:35 <flaper87> yes
14:32:44 <flaper87> those were open questions for everyone
14:33:03 <flaper87> I guess people are fine with your update :D
14:33:04 <flaper87> w00h000
14:33:07 <flaper87> thanks a bunch nikhil
14:33:12 <flaper87> moving on
14:33:13 <nikhil> yw
14:33:19 <flaper87> #topic Glance virtual mid-cycle summary (flaper87)
14:33:37 <flaper87> We had a virtual summit last week
14:33:42 <flaper87> it was supposed to be recorded
14:33:44 <flaper87> you can blame me
14:33:46 <flaper87> :)
14:33:55 <flaper87> Apparently I don't know how to click a freaking button
14:34:07 <flaper87> (except for those that say: "Here take 1M USD"
14:34:08 <flaper87> )
14:34:14 <flaper87> Anywya
14:34:20 <nikhil> haha
14:34:21 <flaper87> anyway, even
14:34:25 <flaper87> I think it was good
14:34:46 <flaper87> We talked about a bunch of stuff an we spent a significant amount of time talking about image import refactor
14:34:58 <flaper87> Here's a small summary (I'll write that email I promissed)
14:35:03 <flaper87> (I promise ;)
14:35:05 <flaper87> :P
14:35:07 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/255274/ (Move Artifacts to glance-glare [landed])
14:35:09 <flaper87> That landed! It's awesome
14:35:19 <mfedosin> for sure
14:35:23 <flaper87> We won't be doing anything else on Glare in the mitaka time-frame
14:35:35 <flaper87> The client patch has been -2'd until we have a better API
14:35:40 <flaper87> and folks will work on the spec
14:35:47 <flaper87> The fast track thing is going away
14:36:06 <flaper87> and we'll all review glare's patches like a bunch of sis/bros that love each other
14:36:16 <rosmaita> :)
14:36:22 <jokke_> :P
14:36:26 <mfedosin> ^_^
14:36:33 <jokke_> Love is in the air
14:36:37 <flaper87> We also talked about quotas
14:36:50 <flaper87> (para pa para pa pa)
14:37:03 <flaper87> There are 2 proposals but nikhil just updated us with the x-prj effort
14:37:15 <nikhil> it's a semi effort
14:37:18 <ninag> if I could add something here?
14:37:18 <flaper87> for completeness and "logness" here are the links
14:37:18 <nikhil> :)
14:37:22 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/266667 (Image quota flwang)
14:37:26 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/275674 (Image quota Nina)
14:37:35 <flaper87> ninag: absolutely
14:38:06 <flaper87> do not ever feel you can't share in this (or any) place in openstack
14:38:10 <ninag> while i think it is great to have Nikhil work on the cross-project spec...it was tried before at 2 summits..so I think we should look at both in paralell
14:38:27 <ninag> working on out own specs while working the cross -project one
14:38:47 <ninag> otherwise we will end up with no having project level quota support again for another release
14:38:59 <flaper87> ninag: that's a good observation. The way x-prj specs normally work is that ppl end up implementing what's written there in every project
14:39:20 <jokke_> I'm still happily opposing that work taking on before we get the v1 deprecated so we can just focus doing it in one place properly
14:39:40 <nikhil> yeah, so there are many dynamics here
14:39:47 <nikhil> 1. API changes
14:39:49 <ninag> I agree we will only do it for v2 APIs..that is a dependency
14:40:03 <nikhil> 2. Conformity on nested
14:40:31 <nikhil> 3. Simple to nested upgrade/config complexity (or keeping stuff optional)
14:41:17 <nikhil> 4. Timing HMT support with nested (last one)
14:41:42 <flaper87> I think there's some work that can definitely be done in parallel but we gotta be super careful we don't diverge from the x-prj effort
14:41:49 <nikhil> I have a lot to say on this (like in the mid cycle) but avoiding due to time crunch
14:42:05 <flaper87> nikhil: let's put it in next week's agenda
14:42:10 <nikhil> k
14:42:12 <flaper87> and we can dedicate a good slot to it
14:42:12 <ninag> I agree: and we have been talking with the other projects (mc_nair who is fixing the CInder issues is on the same team )
14:42:27 <ninag> Sounds good. thanks
14:42:39 <flaper87> ok, moving on. In addition to the above, we also spent Friday's session talking about the image import refactor
14:42:53 <flaper87> Some things to follow up on:
14:42:55 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271021/ (Image import alternatives)
14:43:01 <flaper87> #link https://review.openstack.org/278086 (Image import requirements)
14:43:14 <flaper87> The first is a list of alternatives mclaren proposed
14:43:25 <flaper87> the second is a clarification of what the requirements are
14:43:35 <flaper87> We agreed to push the coding side of this work to Newton
14:43:43 <flaper87> There's simply no time for that in Mitaka
14:43:44 <flaper87> BUT
14:43:54 <flaper87> we have to reach an agreement by M-3
14:44:23 <flaper87> That's the goal for Mitaka, at least
14:44:36 <rosmaita> just want to say something about https://review.openstack.org/#/c/278086/ ...
14:44:47 <rosmaita> i know the original spec is a monster, so a lot of people's eyes may have glazed over reading it
14:44:49 <flaper87> If there will be a discussion in austin about this, it has to be very specific and related to future works on this area
14:45:02 <rosmaita> ... but it would be great if everyone here could take a look at this much much much shorter patch and leave comments if you have an opinion
14:45:11 <flaper87> I don't want us to spend another 8 months planning this work :)
14:45:17 <flaper87> rosmaita: ++
14:45:31 <rosmaita> yes, now is the time to object or point out flaws in what we are proposing
14:45:34 <rosmaita> (actually, december was the time, but here's a second chance!)
14:45:36 <rosmaita> (but it would be nice if this is the last chance!)
14:45:41 <mclaren> I said I'd research tempurls a bit (for sigmavirus24)
14:45:49 <mclaren> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/swift-temp-url-for-glance-uploads
14:45:53 <mclaren> ^ some notes
14:45:57 <flaper87> mclaren: thanks for taking the time
14:46:04 <flaper87> I'll go through those
14:46:33 <flaper87> ok, that's it on this topic
14:46:38 <flaper87> (jeeez I'm slow today)
14:46:38 <mclaren> first problem is tempurl doesn't currently support > 5GB (ie the sub-large-object limit)
14:46:57 <flaper87> mclaren: I think it'd be better to have a topic for this in next week's meeting
14:47:02 <mclaren> sure
14:47:05 <flaper87> thoughts ?
14:47:09 <flaper87> awesome
14:47:27 <flaper87> #topic M-3 approaching (flaper87)
14:47:35 <flaper87> M-3 is around the corner
14:47:53 <flaper87> #link http://releases.openstack.org/mitaka/schedule.html#m-3
14:47:55 <flaper87> like, no joke
14:47:58 <flaper87> cycle is almost over
14:48:02 <flaper87> and it's been super fun
14:48:05 <jokke_> I missed the Fri session, but iiuc the spec that was agreed on is pretty close to the solution we agreed in Tokyo so before reading that PS is that proposing a) us starting the planning from scratch b) refining some details from the merged spec or c) something different?
14:48:16 <flaper87> NOW, there are still things that need to be completed
14:48:34 <flaper87> there are specs that have been approved that need to be implemented
14:48:56 <flaper87> I've set a soft deadline for next week's friday. If patches are not up and green by then, I'll move those specs out of Mitaka
14:49:14 <flaper87> The next two weeks should be spent on reviews only (or mostly)
14:49:44 <flaper87> Any questions?
14:49:58 <flaper87> I've went through all the patches available and -1'd requesting updates
14:50:04 <flaper87> I'll do the same next monday
14:50:11 <rosmaita> jokke_: (a) not proposing start from scratch, (b) my update patch is to remind us what we agreed on, (c) so that it's clear what to think about in evaluating mclaren 's alternatives patch
14:50:50 <flaper87> I guess there are no questions on this topic
14:50:59 <flaper87> #topic Vulnerability needs help
14:51:06 <kairat_> Perhaps this deserves review day
14:51:24 <flaper87> kairat_: or review week :P
14:51:25 <kairat_> as we have done previously
14:51:28 <kairat_> yep
14:51:32 <flaper87> ++
14:51:35 <flaper87> So, vulnerability
14:51:46 <mfedosin> just wanted to say about 'review night'
14:51:56 <flaper87> this cycle has been quieter, I guess. BUT, there are some security bugs that need some help and reviews
14:52:14 <flaper87> It's not nice to have sec issues opened and it's not nice to not having folks dedicating enough time to it
14:52:31 <flaper87> So, I'd like to improve that situation asap because it's never too late to tackle security issues
14:52:45 <flaper87> For security reasosn the sec team is not super big
14:52:54 <flaper87> But, I believe we could use 1 more person there
14:53:04 <jokke_> rosmaita: thnx
14:53:10 <flaper87> and perhaps someone willing to take a more active leadership on that front
14:53:20 <flaper87> hemanthm: has done some great reviews
14:53:26 <flaper87> but I believe he's swamped right now
14:53:34 <nikhil> or on vacation
14:53:43 <rosmaita> no, swamped
14:53:49 <flaper87> I talked to him, he's swamped
14:53:53 <rosmaita> (i was talking to him yesterday)
14:54:20 <flaper87> so, if you would like to help with our security team, please contact me
14:54:31 <flaper87> I'll be doing some changes in glance's coresec team
14:54:36 <flaper87> and we need support
14:54:54 <rosmaita> who's in coresec now?
14:55:00 <nikhil> ok, I promise to be more active there. PRolly reduce attn in others.
14:55:08 <flaper87> mclaren rosmaita (you?) nikhil hemanthm and I
14:55:13 <flaper87> those are the names I remember
14:55:16 <nikhil> um
14:55:19 <flaper87> mclaren is our sec liaison
14:55:27 <rosmaita> i don't think i am
14:55:29 <flaper87> I might be wrong about that list
14:55:30 <nikhil> I think it's 4 and rosmaita isn't there
14:55:35 <flaper87> oh ok
14:55:44 <flaper87> sorry about that
14:55:46 <flaper87> :D
14:55:47 <nikhil> +1 to mfedosin if he wants
14:55:52 <nikhil> we would need one for glare
14:55:57 <flaper87> ++
14:55:59 <rosmaita> i agree
14:56:00 <mfedosin> I'll think about it
14:56:06 <nikhil> :)
14:56:10 <nikhil> sorry
14:56:11 <flaper87> mfedosin: not just think, look at your calendar as well
14:56:24 <flaper87> I'm sure you have like a gazillion of other projects you're working on
14:56:27 <flaper87> :P
14:56:31 <flaper87> perhaps kairat_ ?
14:56:34 <flaper87> :D
14:56:36 * flaper87 is enjoying this
14:56:38 <flaper87> hahahahha
14:56:39 <nikhil> ++
14:56:46 <mfedosin> flaper87: it was a polite repulse
14:57:11 <nikhil> I am changing my email filters, though I just see one bug this cycle
14:57:13 <flaper87> ok, ppl, just think about it. Sec is important, your cloud could go down if there's a sec issue #salespitch
14:57:23 <rosmaita> i would support kairat_ , he pays close attention to details
14:57:41 <flaper87> anyway, that's it from me
14:57:41 <kairat_> So I may help with that
14:57:45 <mfedosin> kairat is responsible for security bugs here
14:57:51 <flaper87> SOLD!
14:57:54 <flaper87> kairat_ it is
14:57:56 <flaper87> :D
14:57:58 <flaper87> w000h000
14:58:01 <kairat_> mfedosin means in Mirantis
14:58:01 <jokke_> :)
14:58:02 <kairat_> Ok
14:58:11 <jokke_> kairat_: now in upstream as well
14:58:24 <mfedosin> kairat_: Congrats!
14:58:38 <flaper87> ok, I'll take the rest offline
14:58:43 <kairat_> Ok
14:58:43 <flaper87> #topic Open Discussion
14:58:47 <flaper87> 2 mins
14:59:25 <rosmaita> seriously people, please take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/278086/, it's a quick read
14:59:31 <flaper87> rosmaita: ++
14:59:32 <mfedosin> Darja made updates for her filter patch
14:59:41 <flaper87> ppl do what uncle Brian says
14:59:44 <flaper87> >.>
14:59:50 <flaper87> mfedosin: saw that
15:00:05 <jokke_> If someone did not notice yet, my affiliation with HP ended at 3rd of Feb ... this means that my mailing list subscription (to my work e-mail) dropped out as well and I haven't set sufficient spam filter on my private one yet to subscribe there
15:00:17 <mfedosin> Splease review it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248359/
15:00:24 <mfedosin> thanks in advance
15:00:25 <jokke_> so if you need something from me, please drop me direct e-mail or ping me here
15:00:27 <nikhil> jokke_: oh, I didn't notice
15:00:37 <jokke_> here meaning irc ... I have client always online
15:00:48 <flaper87> jokke_: thanks for the heads up
15:01:10 <nikhil> and time..
15:01:24 <flaper87> out of time
15:01:25 <mfedosin> thanks all :)
15:01:27 <flaper87> #endmeeting