14:07:54 <abhishekk> #startmeeting glance
14:07:55 <openstack> Meeting started Thu Oct  3 14:07:54 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is abhishekk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:07:56 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:07:58 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:08:09 <abhishekk> #topic roll call
14:08:24 <rosmaita> o/
14:08:25 <abhishekk> o/
14:08:36 <jokke_> o/
14:08:50 <abhishekk> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:09:02 <jokke_> hey, sorry bit late ... sick as dog since last night
14:09:17 <abhishekk> jokke_, take care,
14:09:28 <rosmaita> sorry to hear that
14:09:42 <abhishekk> looks like 3 amigos again :P
14:09:54 <rosmaita> we have to stop meeting like this!
14:09:59 <jokke_> yeah :D
14:10:22 <abhishekk> lets start
14:10:41 <abhishekk> #topic Updates
14:11:07 <jokke_> Shanghai is Month away
14:11:35 <abhishekk> Yes, I will prepare a template for agenda and will share it on ML
14:13:36 <jokke_> I think the rest of our news is release related
14:13:44 <abhishekk> right
14:13:53 <abhishekk> Lets move
14:14:06 <abhishekk> #topic release/periodic jobs update
14:14:40 <jokke_> So glance_store 1.0.1 was released from Train Stable branch to ensure that the reserved store options gets correctly registered
14:14:52 <rosmaita> \o/
14:14:57 <abhishekk> \o/
14:15:17 <jokke_> and we got rethinking FS access finally getting through the gate after about 36hr fight, so rc1 is out as of yesterday morn
14:15:31 <abhishekk> \o/
14:15:31 <rosmaita> \o/
14:15:57 <jokke_> the release patch also cut stable/train from it so anything we want in Train final, needs to land in master and stable/Train
14:16:12 <abhishekk> ack
14:16:46 <jokke_> I think all housekeping patches around cutting the stable branches should be merged
14:17:38 <jokke_> So my big question is, do we have anything urgent we missed from RC1 that we definitely want to have in Train Final
14:17:48 <jokke_> we need to get those reviews under works right now
14:18:08 <abhishekk> AFAIK, we have everything that we planned
14:18:19 <jokke_> as we were 4-5 days late cutting RC1 we have very short RC window
14:19:26 <abhishekk> ack
14:19:46 <abhishekk> Regarding periodic jobs, everything is green
14:19:53 <abhishekk> so no worries at the moment
14:20:15 <jokke_> great, although we saw lots of subunit parser failures on those last patches
14:20:51 <jokke_> so that's still lingering there even it has not surfaced in last periodic tests
14:20:59 <abhishekk> jokke_, ack, I guess we can get rid of it after we remove the registry from our code base
14:21:29 <rosmaita> that needs to be a U priority
14:21:34 <jokke_> lets hope so ... I tried but it wasn't exactly easy so we missed that from Train
14:21:55 <abhishekk> rosmaita, ack
14:22:25 <rosmaita> maybe a ptg session, jokke_ can share the problems he encountered and maybe we can divide up the work
14:22:42 <abhishekk> ++
14:22:47 <rosmaita> although it would be even better if it were done before november
14:23:03 <rosmaita> maybe a video conference meeting right after final RC?
14:23:34 <abhishekk> sounds good to me
14:23:49 <jokke_> I'll clean up as much of Registry testing away as possible during next week ... watch for a patch
14:23:55 <rosmaita> ok, you set it up or otherwise we will pick a bad time!
14:24:39 <jokke_> if stable/train has gating problems still, we can always backport that as registry was already scheduled for removal in Train so we really don't need to support it
14:24:59 <abhishekk> cool
14:25:09 <jokke_> lots of the issues are testing related. Some of our tests are really tangled
14:25:37 <abhishekk> I also tried for removing the registry, but it is causing one of the unit test failure which is not using registry at all :/
14:25:49 <jokke_> yup
14:26:13 <jokke_> So getting rid of it might need quite a bit of refactoring the tests
14:26:22 <abhishekk> yes
14:26:25 <rosmaita> probably one of the test base classes loads a fake registry or something for "convenience"
14:26:36 <jokke_> which is very sub optimal and needs to be two separate patches
14:26:58 <jokke_> if we need to change tests, we need to make sure those tests run clean already before we remove the registry
14:27:21 <jokke_> and not do it in one patch
14:27:28 <abhishekk> right
14:27:31 <rosmaita> and test changes are really hard to review to make sure they're still testing something and not just passing
14:27:41 <jokke_> yup
14:27:57 <jokke_> have I ever mentioned how I dislike unit tests? :P
14:28:09 <abhishekk> :D
14:28:40 <rosmaita> they are second only to your dislike to config help text
14:28:54 <abhishekk> haha
14:29:14 <jokke_> Only the extra clutter in them
14:29:28 <abhishekk> Let's move ahead
14:29:31 <jokke_> :)
14:29:44 <abhishekk> #topic Need to move Train specs/lite-specs to implemented
14:29:53 <abhishekk> jokke_, ^^
14:30:21 <jokke_> yep, that needs to be done, also for documenting purposes would be nice finally merge the train priorities
14:30:35 <rosmaita> jokke_: you need to get infra to change approval for glance-specs reviews over to abhishekk
14:30:54 <jokke_> rosmaita: no I don't, he is already in the group
14:31:07 <jokke_> I added him Tuesday I think
14:31:11 <rosmaita> excellent
14:31:32 <jokke_> will drop myself out of there at release
14:31:36 <abhishekk> Yes, I just checked
14:32:03 <jokke_> it's similar as core group where memebers can add new memebers so it's self managed
14:32:27 <abhishekk> great
14:33:24 <abhishekk> jokke_, is train priorities patch up-to-date
14:33:48 <jokke_> yup, it's the list what we had prioritized for this cycle
14:34:10 <abhishekk> jokke_, ack
14:34:14 <jokke_> I was just struggling a lot to get the formatting right but it has been correct for month or so
14:34:28 <jokke_> thanks to rosmaita
14:34:38 <jokke_> and his patience to help me out
14:34:40 <rosmaita> :D
14:34:49 <abhishekk> :D
14:35:00 <abhishekk> ok, let's move ahead
14:35:17 <abhishekk> #topic Ussuri specs directory
14:35:32 <abhishekk> I have created a patch to create a specs directory
14:35:41 <abhishekk> #link https://review.opendev.org/682543
14:36:12 <abhishekk> Kindly review, so that people can start submitting specs
14:36:25 <jokke_> rosmaita: can you check that it's all sound? I have nothing against it and it looked good to me, just I probably missed everything if any that was wrong with it :P
14:36:58 <rosmaita> link?
14:37:08 <jokke_> three rows up^^
14:37:10 <rosmaita> (sorry, i am in 2 other meetings)
14:37:51 <abhishekk> ohh
14:37:57 <abhishekk> that's it
14:38:13 <abhishekk> #topic Open Discussion
14:39:39 <abhishekk> do we have anything to discuss, or we can wrap this early
14:40:03 <rosmaita> some of those symlink files are weird
14:40:09 <jokke_> Big thanks for your support guys! We're almost there and abhishekk is taking over. I will put my focus on the edge stuff, which of pretty much all is Glance, so you won't get rid of me
14:40:21 <rosmaita> a few have extra blank lines
14:40:44 <abhishekk> rosmaita, please add comments, I will get rid of those
14:41:01 <rosmaita> abhishekk: how did you create those? by hand or by creating a symlink?
14:41:09 <abhishekk> jokke_, Thank you for driving us for last couple of years
14:41:16 <rosmaita> ++
14:41:17 <abhishekk> rosmaita, I have created it manually
14:42:20 <rosmaita> not sure if that will work, i'll have to checkout the change and see what happens
14:43:01 <abhishekk> rosmaita, ack
14:43:03 <jokke_> abhishekk: iirc git handles symlinking well, so you can just do the symlinks in your local repo and git should be able to handle the changes
14:43:17 <abhishekk> I remember I have created Train patch same way :P
14:43:29 <jokke_> ah ;)
14:43:29 <rosmaita> yeah, i'm wondering if it will treat these manual ones as just text files
14:43:31 <abhishekk> jokke_, ack
14:44:09 <abhishekk> rosmaita, hope we are not in trouble
14:44:31 <rosmaita> nothing that can't be fixed ...
14:44:47 <abhishekk> ack
14:44:48 <jokke_> rosmaita: if abhishekk did the train ones same way they should work as the train page renders grand
14:45:02 <rosmaita> they're the links to the templates
14:45:06 <jokke_> it's just extra careful work that git know how to handle autimatically as well :D
14:45:07 <rosmaita> they don't render
14:45:33 <jokke_> well the links renders just fine as in they work
14:47:31 <jokke_> but like said, I trust you spotting any potential issues out of the way more than myself
14:47:35 <rosmaita> actually they don't
14:47:38 <abhishekk> +1
14:47:40 <rosmaita> they are just text files in train
14:47:52 <abhishekk> :/
14:48:12 <jokke_> darn, I'm pretty sure I've clicked those links, but apparently not then
14:48:32 <jokke_> so in that case you really need to do the symlinks and let git construct those files
14:48:38 <abhishekk> sorry for the trouble
14:48:44 <rosmaita> np
14:49:04 <jokke_> tells how much those links are used when no-one spotted the issue for 6 months
14:49:09 <rosmaita> nobody noticed so it's not a problem
14:49:14 <rosmaita> what jokke_ said
14:49:43 <abhishekk> I will take care henceforward
14:49:58 <abhishekk> * keep in mind about symlinks
14:50:27 <jokke_> thanks rosmaita for looking into it, like said for me it looked fine refering to the previous ones
14:51:01 <rosmaita> :)
14:51:10 <abhishekk> +1
14:53:00 <abhishekk> do we have anything else or should we wrap up so that jokke_ could use some rest
14:54:26 <rosmaita> nothing from me
14:54:28 <jokke_> I don't have anything else
14:54:38 <abhishekk> cool, lets wrap up
14:54:47 <jokke_> looking forward to see you two in Shanghai once this release is wrapped
14:54:50 <abhishekk> Get well soon jokke_ , we need you in PTG
14:55:01 <abhishekk> Thank you all
14:55:09 <jokke_> yeah, this should not take more than day or to to get over
14:55:13 <jokke_> Thanks!
14:55:20 <abhishekk> #endmeeting