14:01:17 #startmeeting glance 14:01:18 Meeting started Thu May 14 14:01:17 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is abhishekk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:01:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:01:21 #topic roll call 14:01:22 The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 14:01:29 o/ 14:01:31 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda 14:01:35 o/ 14:01:46 small agenda today 14:01:55 lets wait couple of minutes for others 14:02:17 o/ 14:02:31 cool, lets start 14:02:41 #topic Updates 14:03:04 Ussuri is released \o/ 14:03:17 \\o \o/ o// o/7 14:03:20 GZ! 14:03:25 yay! 14:03:27 We did manage to achieve what we planned for this cycle 14:03:41 well done abhishekk 14:03:46 Thank you everyone for support 14:04:07 jokke_, thank you 14:04:09 abhishekk: was this your first release? 14:04:21 rosmaita: it was 14:04:21 rosmaita, as PTL yes 14:04:39 congratulations! i wish you many more!!! 14:04:50 thank you :D 14:05:23 Now this leads us officially for V planning 14:05:42 #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Glance-Victoria-PTG-planning 14:05:53 I have added some topics and will identify some more 14:06:24 Kindly have a look and help me if I miss anything 14:06:31 jokke_, rosmaita ^^ 14:06:40 ack 14:06:44 sure 14:06:52 thank you 14:06:58 Moving ahead 14:07:12 #topic release periodic jobs update 14:07:25 Same couple of failures due to oslo issue 14:07:51 Bug is reported for the same in oslo, I will try to followup for the same 14:08:00 cool, let keep eye on that bug 14:08:07 jokke_, yes 14:08:18 that way we know if we keep failing after that is reported fixed 14:08:27 Other than that everything is green at the moment 14:08:32 * smcginnis sneaks in late 14:08:33 jokke_, right 14:08:44 smcginnis, o/ 14:08:56 smcginnis was out late partying after the release yesterday :) 14:09:00 Hah 14:09:03 mhm 14:09:22 To bed early since release activities started way too early my time. ;) 14:09:24 haha, well deserved 14:09:26 smcginnis: thanks for yet another cycle of release support 14:09:38 this is what I will miss this time, our dinner together in PTG 14:09:38 Nice work everyone. It was a good release cycle. 14:09:55 Yeah, would be really nice to see everyone. 14:10:01 abhishekk: maybe we should plan a virtual happy hour at the PTG 14:10:29 +2 if jokke_ hosts :D 14:11:02 +2 to jokke_ hosting 14:11:27 jokke_,please vote +w :P 14:11:36 :D 14:11:42 hahah! 14:11:51 +W 14:12:15 :D 14:12:20 moving ahead 14:12:33 #topic Image encryption 14:12:44 Contact 'Josephine Seifert for image encryption 14:12:54 I am not able to trace her 14:13:04 jokke_, is it possible for you to contact her? 14:13:23 i had been attending the weekly meetings, but don't think it was held the past 2 weeks 14:13:30 (or i was in the wrong irc channel) 14:13:47 we need to make sure whether she or her team is still working on this 14:13:54 tell you what, i will reach out to her 14:14:01 rosmaita, great 14:14:11 because i have her scheduled to do the os-brick work for victoria M-1 14:14:29 Yeah will try to ... last update I got was that they were waiting for the barbican bits to be released 14:14:31 awesome, we need to target this work in V cycle 14:14:35 ok, i will report back next week 14:14:41 +2 14:14:43 the barbican stuff got reverted 14:14:52 jokke_, thank you 14:15:01 not sure exactly what the problem was, but i think it will land early in victoria 14:15:07 oh, that's unfortunate setback 14:15:13 rosmaita, barbican stuff is tracked in storyboard, right? 14:15:23 i think so 14:15:42 i will reach out about the barbican stuff, too, because we would like to use that in cinder, too 14:15:46 AFAIK they are not even participating the vPTG so not sure what's going on in that space 14:15:59 and maybe to harden the encryptino key removal stuff in glance 14:16:11 jokke_, right 14:16:16 I was hoping to catch up with them, but they were not listed 14:17:06 ok, so hopefully we will get some update by next week 14:17:35 ++ 14:17:42 moving ahead to Open discussion 14:17:51 #topic Open discussion 14:18:08 #link https://review.opendev.org/#/c/626008/ 14:18:14 review request from rosmaita 14:18:27 yes, please!!! it's been sitting since 2018 14:18:34 will have a look immediately after the meeting 14:18:41 our lower-constraints job has never actually tested anything 14:18:55 :o 14:18:59 also, smcginnis noted that we could refactor the tox.ini file a bit 14:19:09 might be a good low-hanging-fruit bug 14:19:15 I think that was a good call to make that a separate effort. 14:19:19 will have a look 14:20:11 So regarding registry code removal, I have a devstack patch up which was -2 by QE guys 14:20:34 they want us to remove registry usages from all other projects 14:20:51 #link http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=g-reg&i=nope&files=&repos= 14:21:18 Hmm. That's not usually on the team that has deprecated something for a long time like this. 14:21:34 I am planning to send mail on openstack-discuss saying we are going to remove it by V2 milestone 14:22:29 and will request respective teams to remove it from there code base as well before V2 14:22:38 Does this sounds good? 14:22:55 So who is using registry directly? 14:23:41 looks like a lot of people from that link above 14:23:59 no idea, the above link lists lots of usage 14:24:47 the link lists bunch of local.conf samples that enables it, 14:24:52 I can see some tempest plugins and neutron 14:24:55 it doesn't list any usage of it 14:25:28 some yaml and rc files are also there 14:26:06 I would be based on most of these that they are not actually using g-reg. It was just copy pasted along as different projects set up their configuration files. 14:26:20 smcginnis: ++ 14:26:22 We need a proper plan to get registry code out in this cycle 14:27:02 abhishekk: disable tempest, remove registry, deal with dumpsterfires, profit 14:27:02 yeah, i think maybe put up a patch that makes that option a no-op, and then we put up patches that run each of those project's tests depending on the no-op to show that they're not really using the registry 14:27:09 So I will send a mail to ML next week and then we will start removing code around 2nd week 14:27:44 rosmaita, that could be more time consuming 14:27:56 jokke_, that will be last option :D 14:29:00 abhishekk: I like rosmaita's approach as well. Just change the g-reg in devstack to be dummy no-op, if that goes through clean, we can remove registry from glance and leave the no-op to devstack 14:29:31 it is time-consuming, but would probably be faster overall 14:29:46 If all of you agree, then I will draft one mail and send it next week around Monday/Tuesday 14:30:08 ++ 14:30:08 rosmaita, jokke_ Ok, I will start doing changes 14:31:00 maybe make `alias glance-registry echo "Glance registry service has been removed." >> /var/log/glance/glance-registry.log` so calling it and the logfiles will be there 14:31:05 breaking even less things 14:32:00 Ok, let me see how I can do it, will update you accordingly 14:32:05 ;) 14:32:39 That's it from me 14:32:51 Do we have anything else to discuss 14:33:16 I don't think I have anything 14:33:27 rosmaita, smcginnis ? 14:33:51 the PTG etherpad looks pretty full for victoria 14:34:40 Yes, I still need to add registry removal though 14:34:41 Nope 14:34:58 Nothing from me I mean. 14:35:11 great, lets warp up early today 14:35:19 Thanks all! 14:35:26 Once again thank you all and have a nice weekend ahead 14:35:27 really good release 14:35:30 * jokke_ is happy 14:35:40 * abhishekk #metoo 14:35:55 if jokke_ and abhishekk are happy, then i am too 14:36:05 :D 14:36:26 I like it when everyone is happy 14:36:31 :) 14:36:43 cool, wrapping up 14:36:50 #endmeeting