14:00:03 #startmeeting glance 14:00:03 Meeting started Thu Jan 13 14:00:03 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is abhishekk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:03 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:03 The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 14:00:05 #topic roll call 14:00:10 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda 14:00:13 o/ 14:00:43 jokke_, is still on vacation and joining from next week 14:01:02 dansmith, probably not here due to daylight saving 14:02:27 I think its just me, rosmaita and croelandt 14:02:41 lets finish this quickly 14:02:48 yes!!! 14:02:57 #topic release/periodic jobs update 14:03:03 damn 14:03:07 milestone 2 was last week 14:03:13 we have skipped it 14:03:20 I have one question here 14:03:41 rosmaita, we used to bump the migration version after release 14:03:47 https://github.com/openstack/glance/blob/master/glance/db/migration.py#L32 14:04:10 So can we do it after 3rd milestone before cutting the stable branch? 14:04:55 i think so, but TBH my head is not there at the moment 14:05:14 This is the first time we are facing this 14:06:22 We need to release glance_store with the clone v2 issue fix 14:06:32 so I will tag the glance-store release early in next week 14:07:00 will the clone v2 changes be backportable to xena? 14:07:00 Periodic jobs all green 14:07:48 unfortunately not, the change is backward incompatible as it requires glance keyring to access cinder and nova pool 14:08:42 how is that backward incompatible? 14:09:35 if we backport it directly upstream it will not work as it needs devstack patch to backport as well 14:09:51 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/819476 14:11:19 unless you have other opinion, I think it will not be a straightforward backport 14:12:05 well, my understanding of the situation is that without the fix, this change, the bug is unfixable in xena 14:12:28 hang on, let me rephrase, that doesn't make sense 14:12:36 yeah 14:12:56 if we don't backport, we have the bug 14:13:43 if we do backport without the devstack change, the functionality isn't available, but does it break anything else? 14:14:09 yes, it will timeout waiting for access to nova or cinder which it does not have 14:15:50 I think we should submit a reno/document this behavior directly against stable/xena ? 14:16:12 is there opposition from the QA team to backporting the devstack fix? 14:16:46 No, I haven't discussed this with them yet 14:17:21 ok 14:17:54 Lets revisit this next week when jokke_ is around, I think he will also explain why this should not be backported 14:18:05 sounds good 14:18:10 cool 14:18:16 Moving to next topic 14:18:26 #topic SRBAC 14:18:35 We are on track for community goal 14:18:50 manager persona support is for AA deliverables 14:19:21 For yoga we need to ensure that admin, reader and member personas are supported which we do with enough test coverage 14:19:51 We also have functional test support for manager persona ready to show it will not have any regression for us 14:20:05 #link 14:20:08 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-tempest-plugin/+/822324 14:20:54 moving ahead 14:20:57 #topic Cache API 14:21:03 Base patch is ready 14:21:19 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/792022 14:21:33 Work is in progress for adding tempest side coverage 14:21:46 which is expected to complete before next meeting 14:22:01 Till then if you get time please have a look at base patch 14:22:25 that's it from me for today 14:22:29 #topic Open discussion 14:22:59 Tomorrow will be holiday in India, so I will not be around (will be checking mails though) 14:23:32 croelandt, rosmaita anything from you? 14:23:42 abhishekk: nope 14:23:47 nothing from me, have a good holiday 14:23:59 thank you 14:24:06 lets wrap it up 14:24:08 thank you all 14:24:13 have a nice weekend ahead 14:24:34 #endmeeting