14:00:05 <pranali> #startmeeting glance
14:00:05 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Dec  8 14:00:05 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is pranali. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:05 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:05 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:00:06 <pranali> #topic roll call
14:00:06 <pranali> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:00:13 <pranali> o/
14:00:32 <jokke_> o/
14:01:51 <rosmaita> o/
14:02:09 <mrjoshi_> o/
14:02:19 <whoami-rajat> Hi
14:02:20 <croelandt> o/
14:02:44 <pranali> almost everyone is here, abhishek is on PTO today
14:02:47 <pranali> let's start
14:02:53 <pranali> #topic release/periodic job updates
14:02:59 <pranali> Milestone 2 is 4 weeks away from now
14:03:14 <pranali> As we discussed during PTG, next week is review party week :)
14:03:41 <pranali> So as usual, next week we will have video meeting instead of irc meeting on thursday at same time
14:05:48 <pranali> we need to focus on the specs first because I think most of the people will on PTO during year end
14:06:23 <pranali> Periodic job all green except TIME_OUT for fips jobs, everything else is green
14:06:55 <pranali> I hope everyone is ok with the review party plan next week :)
14:07:18 <rosmaita> no objections from me!
14:07:38 <pranali> croelandt, jokke_ ^
14:07:59 <croelandt> yes
14:08:09 <pranali> cool, Thanks !
14:08:24 <pranali> moving ahead
14:08:25 <pranali> #topic Specs
14:08:27 <jokke_> ++
14:08:35 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/863209 - Repropose new location APIs spec
14:08:48 <pranali> whoami-rajat has few questions on this which he has added on the patch
14:09:01 <whoami-rajat> hi
14:09:17 <whoami-rajat> basically nova team reviewed the spec and they've their own bunch of cases where this might cause problem
14:09:50 <whoami-rajat> they've different mechanisms to create VM snapshots and they want to be sure we support that with new policies
14:10:22 <whoami-rajat> the comments are available on the spec, I've tried to answer them with my limited knowledge of glance
14:10:32 <whoami-rajat> but would be good if someone from glance team can also take a look
14:10:40 <whoami-rajat> that's the first concern
14:10:49 <whoami-rajat> another one is the transition of states
14:11:11 <whoami-rajat> IIUC, we add the location once the glance store (rbd, nfs or any) completes the image write process
14:11:33 <whoami-rajat> in which case the image state is saving?
14:11:50 <whoami-rajat> do we want to transition into QUEUED after the image is written? I don't think that's the current workflow
14:12:06 <whoami-rajat> basically i wanted clarity on the state transition we're going to do throughout the image creation
14:12:22 <whoami-rajat> for different cases like normal image creation, via import etc
14:14:33 <jokke_> Just to pitch in, seems I never published my comments on the Sean's queries. As of now Nova uses user tokens for snapshotting as that's the only thing we support, they might do it with expired user token with the service token, but it's done with user token
14:14:45 <jokke_> we do not have the service role existing remember
14:15:46 <whoami-rajat> Sean mentioned a case where they don't use user tokens
14:15:48 <whoami-rajat> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=create-server-back-up-createbackup-action-detail#create-server-back-up-createbackup-action
14:16:01 <whoami-rajat> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/863209/4..5/specs/2023.1/approved/glance/new-location-info-apis.rst#207
14:16:04 <whoami-rajat> here is the comment ^
14:18:37 <whoami-rajat> so basically need someone from glance to take a look at the concerns open on the spec
14:18:44 <whoami-rajat> that's all i wanted to discuss
14:19:16 <jokke_> I am pretty sure he is wrong about that, or the action does not create image, because as said, we don't give another option atm.
14:20:09 <whoami-rajat> ok, that is useful information
14:22:53 <pranali> jokke_, I would be nice if you publish your comments on the spec, so that the discussion would be continued on the spec directly
14:23:30 <jokke_> Yes, I go through those comments and responses again and respond in the review
14:23:46 <pranali> jokke_, thanks !
14:23:55 <whoami-rajat> thanks jokke_ and pranali
14:24:04 <whoami-rajat> that's all from my side
14:24:17 <pranali> whoami-rajat, Thanks !
14:24:29 <pranali> let's move to next topic
14:24:31 <pranali> #topic SRBAC job failure for stable/wallaby
14:24:38 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-tempest-plugin/+/864005
14:24:46 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/864997
14:25:06 <pranali> This devstack wallaby backport is solving the config issue
14:25:25 <pranali> so i have not reverted glance-tempest-plugin to the hash we want which we discussed last time
14:25:49 <pranali> and now we can pin glance-tempest-plugin to wallaby job with 0.2.0 tag after this devstack change
14:26:05 <pranali> this is the test patch to verify the same, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/864865
14:28:16 <pranali> Need some reviews on this, and it would be nice if dansmith or gmann could help on this to get devstack patch merge ASAP
14:28:54 <pranali> That's it from me for today
14:30:42 <pranali> moving to open discussions
14:30:43 <pranali> #topic Open Discussion
14:30:57 <jokke_> nothing from me
14:31:43 <pranali> anyone has anything else to discuss? or we are good to wrap up for today ?
14:32:24 * croelandt is good
14:32:39 <pranali> cool, let's wrap up then
14:32:49 <pranali> Thanks everyone for joining !
14:33:01 <jokke_> cheers o7
14:33:22 <pranali> #endmeeting