14:00:22 <pranali> #startmeeting glance
14:00:22 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Nov  2 14:00:22 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is pranali. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:22 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:22 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:00:22 <pranali> #topic roll call
14:00:22 <pranali> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:00:28 <abhishekk> o/
14:00:30 <pranali> o/
14:00:31 <dansmith> o/
14:00:31 <mrjoshi> o/
14:00:44 <pranali> croelandt is on leave
14:01:16 <pranali> let's wait for mrjoshi for few mins
14:01:38 <mrjoshi> o/
14:01:47 <pranali> ok, let's start
14:01:49 <pranali> #topic Updates
14:02:08 <pranali> Caracal PTG summary submitted , but openstack-disucss thread has not yet updated
14:02:16 <pranali> so can't share the link :/
14:02:18 <pranali> #link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/
14:03:14 <pranali> I've submitted Caracal milstonewise priorities
14:03:25 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/899857
14:03:31 <abhishekk> ack
14:03:43 <pranali> kindly please have a look and let me know if you have any question
14:03:53 <pranali> moving to next
14:03:57 <pranali> #topic release/periodic jobs updates
14:04:09 <pranali> M1 is 2 weeks from now , so we will have Review party next week
14:04:32 <abhishekk> who will be around next week?
14:04:47 <abhishekk> I think you will not be around next week
14:04:58 <abhishekk> so lets postpone it to week after
14:05:25 <pranali> I will be there next week, taking PTO from 13th Nov to 29 Nov
14:05:50 <abhishekk> Ok, no issues then
14:05:57 <abhishekk> mrjoshi, will you be around?
14:06:01 <mrjoshi> yes
14:06:09 <abhishekk> cool
14:06:19 <pranali> yeah we can review some imp patches next week so that we can tag m1 :)
14:06:36 <abhishekk> sounds good
14:06:51 <pranali> moving ahead
14:06:53 <pranali> #topic New Location APIs
14:07:06 <abhishekk> periodic jobs
14:07:18 <pranali> oops
14:07:24 <pranali> Periodic job are all green
14:07:43 <abhishekk> yeah
14:07:46 <abhishekk> but
14:08:04 <abhishekk> glance-cinder-multistore-import is timing out intermittently
14:08:20 <abhishekk> may be we need to sync with whoami-rajat for this
14:08:58 <pranali> ack
14:08:59 <dansmith> abhishekk: timing out during tempest?
14:09:04 <abhishekk> yeah
14:09:18 <dansmith> and is it making progress at that time or does it get stalled?
14:09:26 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/899872/2
14:09:57 <abhishekk> I just noticed that it was timed out on 3-4 patches
14:10:08 <abhishekk> need to go through logs yet
14:10:38 <dansmith> tempest finished there
14:10:43 <dansmith> oh no sorry, scenario
14:11:56 <abhishekk> yeah
14:12:46 <pranali> yeah will check with whoami-rajat
14:13:13 <abhishekk> is it timining out while checking injected metadata?
14:14:53 <dansmith> meaning the glance validation thing?
14:14:57 <dansmith> that's in post and that all seems to work
14:15:11 <abhishekk> yeah, I can see it 3 times
14:16:03 <abhishekk> ok, we can circle back to it in open discussion
14:17:01 <pranali> ok
14:17:10 <pranali> #topic New Location APIs
14:17:39 <pranali> so I have updated the fucntional test scenario as discussed during ptg
14:17:41 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/886947/27/glance/tests/functional/v2/test_images.py#3814
14:18:06 <pranali> Also updated the nova PoC patches as per the suggestions
14:18:17 <pranali> Nova with new glanceclient, old glance - #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891036/7
14:18:29 <pranali> Debug message is logged as expected - "Glance method add_image_location not available"
14:18:45 <pranali> Nova with new glanceclient, new glance  #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/891207/6
14:19:27 <pranali> here nova-ceph-multistore is failing with error, "glance_store.exceptions.NotFound: RBD image 75ba98d0-9643-4a11-93af-66f5f41e6b36 does not exist"
14:19:59 <abhishekk> is it failing everytime with same error?
14:20:25 <dansmith> that's still a pretty significant and potentially related failure
14:20:44 <pranali> not exactly sure, but observed 2 times
14:21:44 <abhishekk> I also think this might be related failure
14:21:56 <pranali> it was working locally when i tested last time
14:22:33 <abhishekk> have you replicated the exact scenario like nova is executing in test?
14:22:40 <pranali> but I will again confirm testing locally though nothing much has been changed in the tasks
14:23:53 <abhishekk> ack
14:24:06 <pranali> i had tried creating image from an instance , with rbd backend
14:25:20 <pranali> moving ahead
14:25:26 <pranali> #topic Specs
14:25:43 <pranali> There are some specs up for review as discussed in PTG, kindly please have a look
14:25:49 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/glance-specs+status:open+owner:akekane%2540redhat.com
14:26:05 <abhishekk> one is pending which I will post next week
14:26:21 <pranali> ack
14:27:02 <pranali> I reproposed the image encrytion spec to current cycle again , #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-specs/+/899856
14:27:54 <abhishekk> ack, add luzi as a reviewer so that she can see there are any changes needs to be made
14:28:04 <pranali> yeah
14:28:39 <pranali> let's move ahead
14:28:42 <pranali> #topic OSC/SDK
14:28:52 <pranali> mrjoshi, ^
14:29:26 <mrjoshi> I have Proposed a patch for metadef-tags list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/896489
14:29:41 <abhishekk> mrjoshi, sorry I forgot to review patches, will review it tomorrow
14:29:51 <mrjoshi> where md-tags were proposed as a separate resource
14:30:55 <mrjoshi> but stephen has raised a concern as in OSC tags are not considered as a separate resource but as an attribute of an another resource
14:31:30 <mrjoshi> whereas in glance cli also we consider metadef tags as a separate resource right?
14:31:57 <abhishekk> yes
14:32:15 <abhishekk> so what is his suggestion here?
14:33:54 <mrjoshi> he is suggesting to not consider them as a separate resource
14:34:33 <mrjoshi> and like other tags
14:34:56 <abhishekk> so what will be the end command in this case for adding tags?
14:36:51 <mrjoshi> there is a class TagMixin from openstack.common.tag which has functionality required for tags
14:38:00 <abhishekk> I need to understand it first before giving any opinion here
14:38:16 <abhishekk> may be we can sync offline tomorrow and discuss this
14:38:27 <mrjoshi> but it is for tags like image tag , we will need to add create-multiple, and all other functionalities as well for which I think making a separate resource would be a better option
14:38:44 <mrjoshi> ok, ack
14:39:06 <abhishekk> cool,please ping me tomorrow
14:39:10 <mrjoshi> sure
14:40:12 <pranali> shall we move ahead?
14:40:18 <abhishekk> yes
14:40:21 <mrjoshi> yes,that's all from me
14:40:24 <pranali> ack
14:40:27 <pranali> #topic Open Discussions
14:41:15 <pranali> anyone has anything else to discuss?
14:41:39 <abhishekk> yes
14:42:19 <abhishekk> dansmith, do you think adding migration logic in driver initiation a good idea?
14:42:54 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/899871/2/glance/image_cache/drivers/centralized_db.py#70
14:43:21 <dansmith> abhishekk: I think keep it out/separate
14:43:46 <dansmith> you might instantiate that driver in each worker, but you would only ever want the migration to happen in a single thread and by one entity
14:43:54 <dansmith> (sorry I haven't seen this code yet)
14:44:05 <abhishekk> yeah
14:44:11 <abhishekk> no proble,
14:44:23 <abhishekk> I will find appropriate place for it
14:44:43 <abhishekk> thanks, I don't have anything else
14:45:10 <pranali> ack
14:45:34 <pranali> then let's conclude for the day
14:45:42 <pranali> Thanks everyone for joining !
14:46:06 <pranali> #endmeeting