14:00:22 <pranali> #startmeeting glance 14:00:23 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Feb 22 14:00:22 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is pranali. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:23 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:23 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 14:00:23 <pranali> #topic roll call 14:00:23 <pranali> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda 14:00:29 <mklejn> o/ 14:00:31 <pranali> o/ 14:00:40 <mrjoshi> o/ 14:01:12 <pranali> let's start, abhishek will not be able to join today 14:01:24 <pranali> #topic release/periodic jobs updates 14:01:49 <pranali> As we all know, M3 is in next week, so we need reviews on priority for Centralized cache DB & New location API changes 14:02:09 <pranali> and considering the random gate failures we might need to be prepare for FFE for the same if all the patches are approved till next Wednesday 14:02:36 <pranali> glance_store 4.7.0 release patch is submitted #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/909436 14:03:00 <pranali> Periodic jobs are all green except intermittent TIME_OUTs on fips jobs 14:03:11 <pranali> moving to next topic 14:03:13 <pranali> #topic Important Reviews 14:03:24 <pranali> Centralized cache DB - #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22centralized-cache-db%22 14:03:24 <pranali> New Location APIS - #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22New-Location-Apis%22 14:03:41 <pranali> Kindly please review these patches on priority so that we can get those in before m3 14:04:08 <pranali> For new location apis, patches are updated by fixing the review comments and nova & cinder side PoCs are working as expected 14:04:48 <pranali> whoami-rajat, has tested this from cinder side and it's working for New location api, there were issue with existing old location api reagrding incompatible location url which is also fixed in this patch 14:04:54 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/906359/8 14:05:37 <pranali> dansmith, we need your vote as well on these new location api patches, I have addressed all the suggestion given by you on location-import change 14:06:42 <pranali> that's it from me 14:06:51 <pranali> moving to next 14:06:53 <pranali> #topic Shelved instance image protection 14:06:58 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22shelved-image-protection%22 14:07:21 <pranali> There is a change proposed to add protection for removing images of shelved instances along with some nova side changes. 14:07:35 <croelandt> I'm a bit worried about that 14:07:40 <pranali> As abhishekk suggested I think we need a design spec first for this enhancement 14:07:46 <croelandt> It adds a config option, which is not "a simple fix" 14:08:03 <croelandt> and do we know whether they expect some kind of backport? Is it a feature or a bug in their mind? 14:08:04 <pranali> yeah right 14:08:25 <croelandt> especially since this config option must then be handled by ooo/NG 14:08:38 <croelandt> so yeah can they discuss it with us at PTG? 14:09:34 <pranali> I think mklejn is here 14:09:48 <mklejn> croelandt: I can join any discussion necessary. Please bare in mind that it's my first contribution, so I'm slightly lost 14:10:01 <croelandt> mklejn: oh ok :) 14:10:13 <croelandt> mklejn: so I don't think the patch is bad, at first glance (pun intended) it looks fine 14:10:34 <croelandt> but the way we do things, there is a lot of brueaucracy (sigh) and also real concerns about backporting & deployment 14:10:56 <croelandt> We have a meeting between April 8 - 12 that you could join 14:11:04 <croelandt> pranali: do we have an Etherpad with a list of topics already? 14:11:41 <pranali> croelandt, no not yet :) once it's ready I will make to add this topic there 14:11:53 <mklejn> croelandt: I've also made integration tests for this, but I didn't know which tempest is the right place to push it :) 14:11:56 <croelandt> ok :) 14:12:09 <croelandt> mklejn: how urgent would you say this is? Can this wait for the next cycle? 14:13:13 <mklejn> croelandt: yes, it can. don't see a problem with that 14:14:03 <croelandt> ok so probably we should discuss it during PTG in April and merge it during the next cycle 14:14:31 <pranali> mklejn, cool.. we are already at the end of this current cycle so we can discuss this during PTG and have it in next cycle along with spce 14:15:16 <mklejn> croelandt, pranali: sure, I'll join PTG then 14:15:35 <pranali> mklejn, gr8 14:15:44 <pranali> let's move to open discussions then 14:15:46 <pranali> #topic Open Discussion 14:15:51 <mklejn> and I'll do the spec in the meantime. about tempest: should I push tests to tempest repo or glance-tempest-plugin? 14:17:07 <croelandt> Ideally I'd say the plugin 14:17:08 <pranali> I think tempest would be ok, or you can add scenario test in the plugin 14:17:32 <mklejn> plugin it is then. thanks 14:18:53 <pranali> croelandt, could you please have a look at the location api patches again ? I have updated few things today 14:19:37 <croelandt> yeah I remember I had a few comments 14:19:41 <croelandt> I'll go throug them again 14:20:07 <pranali> tomorrow is Recharge Day, so I will submit the release related patches like, releasenotes & config refresh on monday 14:20:15 <pranali> croelandt, Thanks ! 14:20:32 <pranali> so that's it from me, anyone has anything else to discuss ? 14:20:37 <croelandt> Can't wait to be on Monday to review that! 14:21:11 <pranali> :) 14:22:15 <pranali> shall we conclude for the day then ? 14:22:20 <croelandt> fine with me 14:22:24 <pranali> cool 14:22:39 <pranali> Thanks everyone for joining !! 14:22:50 <pranali> #endmeeting