14:00:14 <pranali> #startmeeting glance
14:00:14 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Feb 29 14:00:14 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is pranali. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:14 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:14 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:00:14 <pranali> #topic roll call
14:00:14 <pranali> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:00:25 <pranali> o/
14:00:34 <mrjoshi> o/
14:00:46 <croelandt> o/
14:00:57 <abhishekk> o/
14:00:58 <rosmaita> o/
14:01:01 * croelandt only half-paying attention
14:01:10 <pranali> Let's start
14:01:15 <pranali> #topic release/periodic jobs updates
14:01:33 <pranali> We are in M3 week, since we are going to tag m3, we need to get these patches in
14:01:35 <pranali> releasenotes for m3 - #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/910202
14:01:35 <pranali> Refresh Config - #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/910203/1
14:01:53 <pranali> before merging releasenotes patch we need to wait for glance-cache-manage deprecation patch to confirm if deprecation note is rendering properly or not
14:02:36 <pranali> but i think it's again failing on functional-py39 after recheck
14:03:46 <pranali> we can wait for some more time for this
14:04:06 <pranali> once these 2 patches merged I will submit the release patch
14:04:46 <pranali> Regarding New Location APIs, Can we raise FFE ? so that we can have this feature in this cycle?
14:05:14 <rosmaita> is the holdup with new location apis getting reviews?
14:05:36 <rosmaita> i mean, is the holdup that we don't have enough reviews
14:05:51 <pranali> well, few of them are having +2s but the base patch is still waiting for the +2
14:06:14 <pranali> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22New-Location-Apis%22
14:06:19 <rosmaita> thanks!
14:07:06 <pranali> this is been tested with nova poc patch and cinder poc as well, though the newly added cinder job is failing on this similar to old loc api, locally it's working
14:07:50 <pranali> abhishekk, croelandt what would you suggest?
14:08:04 <abhishekk> my concern is it is failing in gate for cinder
14:08:22 <abhishekk> SO unless we fixed it on priority it will be a problematic
14:09:04 <pranali> it's working locally, so we need to figure out the problem with that failing job
14:09:18 <pranali> and we can fix it later as well
14:10:03 <abhishekk> what if it needs changes in your code
14:10:04 <pranali> i think is, this feature will get delayed by one more cycle
14:10:39 <rosmaita> well, we can aim to have it finished before M-1 and do a preliminary release
14:10:41 <pranali> i don't think the issue is with new loc api code because same is failing for existing old loc api as well
14:11:34 <abhishekk> I am not saying there is issue in your code
14:12:11 <abhishekk> I am saying that what if we need to make changes in your code as well to make it work
14:12:32 <pranali> I mean if there are bugs then we can fix those later as well and backport those
14:12:42 <abhishekk> So I agree with rosmaita to have fix it till m1 or else move it to next cycle
14:13:27 <pranali> m1 means next cycle, right?
14:13:35 <abhishekk> sorry rc1
14:13:52 <rosmaita> i actually meant m-1 of dalmation
14:13:58 <abhishekk> ohh
14:14:19 <rosmaita> but if we think we can have everything worked out before rc-1, then we could do a FFE
14:14:25 <pranali> and for having it in rc1, we need FFE, right?
14:14:31 <abhishekk> FFE needs favor from 2 Cores
14:14:37 <rosmaita> it just sounds like we will have to work on this and only this before rc-1
14:14:53 <rosmaita> so if we are ok with that, i am not against a FFE
14:14:53 <abhishekk> I can vote in favor
14:15:11 <abhishekk> I need FFE for centralized db as well
14:15:22 <abhishekk> but again it is ok to be get merged next cycle
14:15:51 <rosmaita> so, here is my thought ...
14:16:29 <pranali> yeah, till rc1 we have 2 weeks in hands so we can work on that i think
14:16:32 <rosmaita> this is a SLURP release, so for something like location API that impacts 2 other services, might be better to release in  Dalmation (non-slurp) so we have some time to work out issues
14:16:55 <rosmaita> because many consumers won't upgrade to dalmation
14:17:14 <rosmaita> so i suggest concentrate on the centralized DB for rc-1
14:17:32 <rosmaita> and then we prioritize getting location API finished before M-1 of Dalmatian
14:17:33 <pranali> hmm ok makes sense
14:17:52 <abhishekk> ack
14:18:14 <rosmaita> and croelandt will point out that "Dalmation" is not how you spell "Dalmatian"
14:18:22 <pranali> ok, then let's raise FFE for centralized DB
14:18:30 <abhishekk> ack
14:19:03 <abhishekk> So do i need to raise it today or tomorrow?
14:19:06 <pranali> abhishekk, we need to submit FFE mail today itself
14:19:12 <abhishekk> ack
14:19:52 <pranali> that's it from me for today
14:20:07 <pranali> moving to open discussions
14:20:09 <pranali> #topic Open Discussion
14:20:21 <pranali> deprecating glance-scrubber patch is merged
14:20:49 <abhishekk> mail sent
14:21:21 <pranali> I just have one request, since we have decided to move New LoC API to m1 please review the patches on priority
14:22:20 <pranali> We had decided the same in last cycle as well, though we got some other unexpected issues like ceph deletion issue, we didn't get reviews on the patches on time :(
14:22:49 <pranali> abhishekk, ack Thanks
14:23:04 <pranali> so this one needs 2 cores approval right?
14:23:15 <abhishekk> yes or PTL
14:23:21 <pranali> ohk
14:24:04 <rosmaita> pranali: you can announce that no features will be merged in D until after location API has been merged
14:24:20 <abhishekk> :D
14:24:21 <pranali> :D
14:24:22 <rosmaita> i think the core team will agree to that
14:25:03 <pranali> yeah at least accepting specs for new RFEs will be in my hand :P
14:25:36 <rosmaita> you know, as PTL you should have at least -W powers
14:25:43 <pranali> I just have one question regarding release, if we raise FFE the we can tag m3 right ?
14:25:43 <abhishekk> :P
14:25:56 <rosmaita> i'm pretty sure we can configure gerrit that way
14:26:14 <pranali> :D
14:26:22 <abhishekk> can we skip it and tag rc1 directly?
14:26:33 <pranali> ohh ok
14:26:43 <rosmaita> yeah, there's no requirement for an m-3 release
14:26:46 <pranali> Thanks !
14:26:50 <abhishekk> cool
14:27:35 <abhishekk> by the way pranali if you run tempest locally then you get smae error as you are getting in gate
14:27:54 <abhishekk> so may be this will help you to debug it locally and see what is happening
14:28:36 <pranali> ohh ok, I will test that locally then
14:28:55 <rosmaita> just replied to abhishekk's FFE email
14:29:30 <pranali> I still don't see that mail in my inbox :/
14:29:56 <abhishekk> thank you rosmaita o/
14:30:43 <rosmaita> pranali: https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/message/MNVHK22LUBXPL5X37U4NEVQOCZSEV3BK/
14:30:44 <pranali> anyone has anything else to highlight?
14:30:56 <abhishekk> Nope
14:31:07 <pranali> rosmaita, Thanks !
14:31:23 <pranali> ok, let's conclude for the day then
14:31:30 <rosmaita> works for me!
14:31:38 <pranali> Thanks everyone for joining !
14:31:52 <pranali> #endmeeting