14:00:19 #startmeeting glance 14:00:19 Meeting started Thu Sep 12 14:00:19 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mrjoshi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:00:19 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'glance' 14:00:25 #topic roll call 14:00:25 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda 14:00:27 o/ 14:01:22 o/ 14:01:49 PTL is not around today 14:02:47 let's wait for few min for other's to join 14:05:05 let's get started 14:05:13 #topic 2025.1/Epoxy PTG 14:05:42 As everyone knows 2025.1 virtual PTG is during October 21 - 25, 14:06:33 I would request you to please add the topics to the planning etherpad that you would like to discuss during the PTG 14:06:35 Glance 2025.1 PTG planning : https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2025.1-ptg-glance-planning 14:07:07 moving to next 14:07:15 #topic release/periodic job updates 14:07:42 we have rc1 this week 14:07:44 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/928526 14:08:08 Periodic jobs are all green 14:08:53 that's it from me, moving to open discussion 14:09:05 #topic Open Discussion 14:09:25 Are bot patches OK to ninja-approve? 14:09:33 I think so, but I wanted to confirm :) 14:10:16 I'm gonna say yes :) 14:10:40 and same for the next question, I think we'll give up on supporting UPPER_CONSTRAINTS since the bot keeps erasing it 14:10:53 and no one really cares apparently 14:11:21 I think release bot patches gets approved by release team and other bot patches glance cores can ninja approve 14:12:45 so the release team has the permissions to merge in glance? 14:14:40 dansmith: are we going to merge glance --> oslo patch? 14:15:10 idk, it failed but not for the problem we were searching for right? 14:15:38 yeah, that is a strange problem 14:15:39 I haven't had a chance to look at the fail yet this morning 14:16:25 but yeah up to you I guess. frustrating that we haven't repro'd the problem when it happened several times in a row earlier 14:16:41 I don't want to merge it and find the gate wedged, but it would only be the import jobs 14:17:42 so since stable already cut, we need to backport it if we merge now 14:17:57 rc1 has cut? 14:18:06 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/928526 14:18:20 whoa.. man time is flying, okay 14:18:40 I guess that means we're toast 14:18:59 yeah :/ I was also not aware about that 14:19:49 also you have added recheck on wrong patch 14:20:11 you need that recheck on retry patch and need to remove -w from format inspector patch 14:20:34 oh sorry yeah I had them both open 14:20:53 np! 14:21:13 We will tag rc2 and make if final rc 14:21:35 so, there is a "bug but really a feature" that glance will not have fixed as a result 14:21:44 not likely to matter much, but just for visibility, 14:22:00 https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2073413 14:22:10 looking 14:22:19 this will affect glance too on import, if someone uses the very old (10+ year) original qcow2 format we won't consider it safe 14:22:30 it's fixed in oslo, but just FYI 14:22:39 that format is deprecated and recommended not to be used by qemu team anymore, 14:22:48 but there are lots of old images in the wild 14:23:10 it's trivial to pre-convert images to the new format as a workaround but just so you know in case someone complains 14:24:01 hmm, thanks for the heads up 14:24:28 So now we need a separate stable only fix for glance 14:24:57 OR merged oslo-format-inspector and backport it? 14:25:03 no, 14:25:17 I think we don't fix it unless someone asks, I'm just heads-upping for visibility 14:25:25 nova specifically didn't fix it until the move to oslo 14:25:43 but we did have a downstream customer complain about it so we're backporting that change downstream-only 14:25:59 Ok, I will make a note of it, yeah we need to do that as well 14:26:03 I'm specifically not fixing it in nova stable because it's more a feature than a bug (it's a grey area really) 14:26:11 since for glance it's only import, it's much less concerning I think 14:26:43 ack, @croelandt I think we need to discuss this internally 14:27:20 between, @dansmith thank you for your time and efforts around CVE and format inspector work 14:27:42 o7 14:28:05 o7 14:28:06 @mrjoshi you can move forward 14:28:19 cool 14:28:21 Anyone has anything else to highlight? 14:29:13 yeah, I will be on PTO till October 10, starting from coming Tuesday 14:29:21 *gasp* 14:29:31 but you can reach me on slack or mail 14:30:22 ack 14:30:24 I will be able to reply post 1400 UTC during week 14:30:45 maybe enjoy the PTO :) 14:31:03 I will, thank you :D 14:33:14 shall we wrap up, if there's nothing more to highlight? 14:33:32 yeah, 14:33:47 Bots patches can be ninja approved by core 14:34:03 * abhishekk nothing more to highlight 14:34:22 ack 14:34:25 Thanks everyone for joining!! 14:34:32 thanks! 14:34:32 ++ 14:34:43 #endmeeting