14:02:06 <croelandt> #startmeeting glance
14:02:06 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Sep 18 14:02:06 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is croelandt. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:02:06 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:02:06 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:02:12 <croelandt> #topic roll call
14:02:13 <croelandt> o/
14:03:09 <mhen> o/
14:05:42 <croelandt> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:05:52 <croelandt> #topic Release/periodic job updates
14:06:04 <croelandt> Currently our oslo-tips jobs are failing
14:06:09 <croelandt> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/961565
14:06:14 <croelandt> ^ This should fix the issue
14:06:29 <croelandt> dansmith: ^
14:06:30 <croelandt> rosmaita: ^
14:06:34 <croelandt> if you ever got a minute :)
14:06:45 <croelandt> #topic Open Discussion
14:06:49 <croelandt> #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/2026.1-ptg-glance-planning
14:06:52 <croelandt> PTG planning is still open
14:07:01 <rosmaita> croelandt: will look at the tips patch
14:07:03 <croelandt> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/961488
14:07:18 <croelandt> rosmaita: dansmith: if you got a minute, this is a patch for S3 that looks simple enough
14:07:24 <croelandt> rosmaita: thanks
14:07:38 <croelandt> mhen: you have the floor
14:07:42 <dansmith> sorry, finishing up another meeting
14:08:26 <mhen> added a comment here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/926295/comment/e5033260_5dac08d4/
14:09:10 <mhen> so basically we are stuck with the image encryption until we agree on how to handle the inner disk format (encrypted payload)
14:10:01 <mhen> my proposal is to make os_decrypt_disk_format mandatory (as dansmith suggested) but still allowing it to be set to "raw" for the time being
14:10:14 <croelandt> for backwards-compatibility reasons?
14:10:53 <mhen> no, because we have open questions and cinder <-> glance interaction to address in order to be able to properly validate any format within the encryption (payload)
14:11:47 <dansmith> I'm not really prepared to have a long discussion about this right now (other meeting still going on) and probably deserves some PTG time,
14:11:56 <dansmith> but we also really need the cinder side of this to be figured out,
14:12:13 <dansmith> both for image encryption and the rest of the glance-as-defender work that is basically waiting for that stuff
14:12:45 <croelandt> ok so this must be one (or multiple) sessions for PTG
14:13:02 <croelandt> could either of you fill out the PTG planning etherpad with a detailed description of our issues?
14:13:30 <mhen> I can do that
14:13:46 <mhen> basically my proposal is to keep the scope of the current image encryption patchset limited and focused, implementing further hardening when the other stuff is ready in a dedicated followup patchset
14:13:53 <dansmith> I talked to rosmaita about this last(?) week, I dunno if he has plans to write up a cross-project session for that stuff or what
14:14:38 <croelandt> rosmaita: can you help with this?
14:14:50 <rosmaita> yes
14:15:03 <croelandt> We've got people who know both Glance and Cinder very well (Rajat, rosmaita for instance) but we need to make sure we know what we want to achieve
14:15:29 <croelandt> ok so ideally we'd have a draft by next week
14:15:45 <rosmaita> mhen: lmk when you have a description in the etherpad and i will add stuff
14:15:48 <croelandt> we still have a few weeks before PTG but I'd rather not have to organize everything in a rush and then realize we forgot half the stuff we needed to discuss :D
14:16:02 <rosmaita> planning ahead is good
14:16:19 <mhen> agreed
14:18:30 <croelandt> ok perfect
14:18:37 <croelandt> mhen: sorry for the delay on the feature
14:18:43 <croelandt> but we'd rather delay it and having something perfect :)à
14:19:59 <croelandt> ok anything else?
14:21:42 <croelandt> nope, let's close this meeting then :)
14:21:45 <croelandt> #endmeeting