14:00:19 <croeland1> #startmeeting glance
14:00:19 <opendevmeet> Meeting started Thu Jan 15 14:00:19 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is croeland1. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:19 <opendevmeet> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:19 <opendevmeet> The meeting name has been set to 'glance'
14:00:23 <croeland1> #topic roll call
14:00:25 <croeland1> o/
14:00:32 <pdeore_> o/
14:00:42 <mhen> o/
14:01:50 <croeland1> rosmaita is probably in another call
14:01:52 <croeland1> abhishekk: around?
14:02:03 <abhishekk> yeah o/
14:02:54 <croeland1> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-team-meeting-agenda
14:03:01 <croeland1> #topic Release/periodic job updates
14:03:08 <croeland1> propose-translation-update started failing
14:03:15 <croeland1> The issue is a missing pcre.h header
14:03:25 <croeland1> I think this may have been caused by  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/970054
14:03:33 <croeland1> tkajinam: if you could confirm this, that'd be nice :)
14:03:40 <croeland1> otherwise it looks fine
14:04:05 <croeland1> #topic Stable patches
14:04:14 <croeland1> #link https://review.opendev.org/q/Ie83417455acb6a952731e812301f550fa89107a3
14:04:36 <croeland1> I'm thinking of merging these backports that add a missing __init__.py file. This does not cause failures for us, but other users seem to have issues with that
14:04:45 <croeland1> if no objections, I'll push both backports
14:05:42 <abhishekk> no objection
14:05:46 <croeland1> thanks!
14:05:47 <croeland1> moving on
14:05:50 <croeland1> #topic One easy patch per core dev
14:06:04 <croeland1> #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/956432  A patch by tkajinam that I'd like not to let rot
14:06:13 <croeland1> I'll probably merge as well by EOW if no objections :)
14:06:48 <abhishekk> you can ninja that
14:07:20 <croeland1> yeah
14:07:28 <croeland1> #topic Open Discussion
14:07:33 <croeland1> mhen: anything for this week? :)
14:08:36 <abhishekk> @croeland1 this one is easy as well
14:08:38 <abhishekk> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance/+/972826
14:10:06 <mhen> not much
14:10:21 <mhen> cinder spec has been getting approvals and might merge soon
14:10:25 <croeland1> abhishekk: my question was: why remove this now, rather than wait for the removal of eventlet altogether?
14:10:52 <abhishekk> I want to break that whole work in small patches
14:12:17 <abhishekk> croeland1: I think you should also talk with eventlet-removal guy (I don't recall his name :/) about whether we should directly remove it or follow deprecation way
14:13:00 <croeland1> oh we can talk to Hervé after this
14:13:20 <croeland1> Anything else?
14:13:28 <abhishekk> I think there is no use of following deprecation method in this case, but we should double check
14:14:27 <abhishekk> nothing from me
14:15:21 <croeland1> ok, thanks everyone for joining!
14:15:23 <croeland1> #endmeeting