17:35:11 #startmeeting glare 17:35:12 Meeting started Mon May 23 17:35:11 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mfedosin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:35:13 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:35:15 The meeting name has been set to 'glare' 17:35:24 #topic agenda 17:35:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-artifacts-sub-team-meeting-agenda 17:35:39 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-artifacts-sub-team-meeting-agenda 17:35:51 #topic Updates 17:36:43 several decisions were made last week in Glare 17:37:08 first one, we decided to simplify our model and removed primitive type Text 17:37:53 before there was a differentiation between String (limited by 255 chars) and Text (unlimited) 17:38:27 but it contradicts with oslo.vo framework 17:39:04 so we had two options: implement our own types (String and Text) 17:39:19 or adapt our model to oslo.vo 17:39:29 we chose the second one 17:39:53 also 2 new property attributes were introduced 17:40:24 sortable - which indicates if it's possible to sort by this property 17:40:34 and filter_ops 17:40:56 it's a list of available list operators 17:41:07 *filter operators 17:41:30 like 'eq', 'neq', 'lt' and so on 17:42:03 also many bugs were fixed - thanks Darja and Kairat 17:42:42 that's all updates at the moment 17:42:53 #topic Spec is out, ready for review 17:43:07 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283136/ 17:43:48 I added latest changes in our model there 17:44:10 and also there is an example of api requests 17:44:41 nikhil: please review it when you have time 17:45:03 Sure 17:45:17 also I wrote a message in ML 17:46:05 Where am I interested in who will use the service 17:46:40 nikhil: thanks :) 17:47:24 #topic 'copy-from' middleware 17:48:04 there is an idea to implement 'copy-from' functionality in Glare like it was in glance v1 17:48:38 but it won't be a part of our api 17:49:01 mfedosin: I don't like that we are discussing so many things 17:49:15 We don't even have a implementation yet 17:49:28 it's just an idea 17:49:36 Our entire focus needs to on MVP 17:49:37 to implement this as middleware 17:49:51 And then we need to discuss everything upstream 17:50:19 not so many people come here to discuss stuff :) 17:50:29 but yeah, you're right 17:50:54 First there needs to be for people to use and play around 17:51:07 Only then there will be interest 17:51:12 all core part is implemented and we're going to spend next 2 weeks in stabilizing the code and the project itself 17:51:36 mfedosin: please focus on making them reviewable 17:51:56 it will be after 2 weeks 17:52:00 The stabilizing should be done upstream when it had been merged 17:52:08 Has 17:52:22 on 6th of June will start 'making them reviewable' :) 17:52:48 Ok 17:53:00 nikhil: it's better to fix problems before merging, imho 17:53:30 instead of doing it when code in a repo 17:53:57 We need to chat 17:54:11 I don't quite like the strategy 17:54:13 what are we doing now? 17:54:31 okay, I got you 17:54:54 but anyway - good news is we have built a conception and ready to present it to big public 17:55:22 I think I have nothing to say here for today 17:55:44 except "please review the spec" 17:56:21 :-) 17:56:29 thanks nikhil 17:56:31 #endmeeting