17:30:14 #startmeeting glare 17:30:15 Meeting started Mon May 30 17:30:14 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mfedosin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:30:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:30:19 The meeting name has been set to 'glare' 17:30:24 o/ 17:30:31 o/ 17:30:32 #topic agenda 17:30:40 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/glance-artifacts-sub-team-meeting-agenda 17:30:43 * docaedo is stepping into an airplane, will miss out, apologies 17:30:54 #topic Updates 17:31:50 kairat wanted to propose some topics today 17:31:59 docaedo: np :) 17:32:28 so, I'm working on our framework 17:32:55 as I mentioned, we decided to simplify our model and remove Text type from it 17:33:06 now there is only String 17:33:23 and 3 other primitive types 17:33:33 Integer, Float and Boolean 17:34:04 kairat is testing adding new artifact types and fixes glare config 17:34:30 dshakhray is implementing test artifact type 17:35:03 that contains all possible properties from our framework 17:35:19 and writing tests, for sure :) 17:35:57 no known bugs are here, so we try to polish the code 17:36:17 and prepare it for community reviews 17:37:12 that's all updates for now 17:38:10 Also docaedo was interested in possibility to integrate Glare with other oauth servers 17:38:32 I think it could be done with standalone auth middleware 17:39:01 and we shouldn't care about it right now 17:39:17 +1 17:39:29 (+1 on not right now) 17:40:01 If everything will be fine we will prepare a list of tasks for community 17:40:13 that have to be implemented in Glare 17:40:37 I think that's all I have for today 17:40:59 woohoo 17:41:28 and also, there is a spec on review 17:41:56 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283136/ 17:42:07 leave your comments there 17:42:15 I'm going to update it today 17:42:33 If there are no any questions I think we can finish 17:42:48 mfedosin: I was told that it is hard to review the spec when the code isn't there. May be you send email to ML explaning how to use the WIP patches to test the functionality and help review the spec? 17:43:20 there is only one big patch 17:43:32 other were abandoned today 17:43:39 (maybe a note explaning that the WIP patch is actually the latest and good to test) 17:43:59 nikhil: good idea 17:44:03 tomorrow then 17:44:10 mfedosin: I saw a bunch of patches from kairat today that are WIP 17:44:22 mfedosin: but it's hard to tell which is the POC and where are other stuff 17:44:27 nikhil: they are actually WIP 17:44:42 mfedosin: I am talking about someone who isn't involved in the development but would like to review: 17:44:59 it's impossible to understand how should I go about reviewing that big piece of code 17:45:34 I think if the bare minimum exists in the review pipe and others are either abandoned or hidden somehow.. 17:46:02 or there's good documentation of what's exactly happening in the development process, it will help with the review 17:46:18 for now, everything looks like a black box :( 17:46:40 spec just describes API 17:47:03 and it's like black box :) 17:47:07 and may be that's the problem 17:47:19 for example, how can I be sure to merge something I do not understand 17:47:40 I think we can organize virtual meetup 17:47:48 anyway, let's ask sudipto_ 's experience of reviewing the spec (if he has had time) 17:47:51 nikhil, mfedosin it's been the similar problem with me. 17:48:14 where I'll go through the code and describe how it works 17:48:17 (currently, I do not know who else is trying to review it proactively) 17:48:28 nikhil, i will take a look at the spec. It's been on my list. I have read through it once but it has been updated since then. 17:48:56 sudipto_: ok, thanks. 17:49:19 sudipto_: yeah, thank you for that! 17:49:51 nikhil, mfedosin the black box problem - i hope we will be able to see through soon :) 17:50:31 I can write a demo, where I tell you how it works very detailed 17:50:33 ok, let's huddle back in a couple of days.. I would like for us to sync after newton-1 is released. May be I will be able to fully review the updated spec again too. 17:50:38 what do you think? 17:51:26 mfedosin: let's chat wednesday on that plan. I will try to review more myself and ask another person about their opinion on how they thing they could review. 17:51:35 think* 17:51:50 okay 17:51:52 mfedosin, nikhil sounds good. 17:52:07 mfedosin, i will read it again tomorrow and give fresh feedback. 17:52:21 that's it from me. thanks mfedosin for being pateint! 17:52:29 thank you folks 17:52:45 I have no idea how I appreciate this :) 17:53:08 my pleasure :) 17:53:29 (trying to be more productive) 17:53:49 +1 :) 17:54:18 The flu knocked me out of the rut for two weeks. 17:54:31 ouch 17:54:36 mfedosin, that didn't show in your nova patches :-) you were pretty efficient :D 17:54:42 hope you are better now 17:54:44 now I'm fine 17:55:33 Just acute bronchitis and cough :) 17:55:48 mfedosin, :( 17:55:57 please feel better soon! 17:56:32 will do :) 17:56:41 okay, we can finish for today 17:56:53 yes, thanks. 17:56:54 thank you for coming 17:57:04 and for hope :D 17:57:18 #endmeeting