18:00:10 <bh526r> #startmeeting gluon
18:00:11 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 19 18:00:10 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is bh526r. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
18:00:12 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
18:00:15 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'gluon'
18:00:23 <pcarver> hi
18:00:23 <bh526r> #topic Roll Call
18:00:27 <bh526r> Hi Paul
18:00:28 <krenczewski> Hi
18:00:32 <bh526r> #info Bin Hu
18:00:36 <bh526r> Hi Kamil
18:00:41 <krenczewski> #info Kamil Renczewski
18:00:48 <pcarver> #info Paul Carver
18:01:23 <bh526r> Georg is on vacation, so he will be absent from meeting
18:01:31 <bh526r> #topic Admin Update
18:01:56 <bh526r> #info No specific update
18:02:13 <bh526r> #info But our Gluon demo will be shown on various places in Boston
18:03:01 <bh526r> #info including Open Source Days Mini Summit on Monday, AT&T Booth, Ericsson Booth and OPNFV Booth
18:03:30 <bh526r> #info We are looking for volunteer to man the booth.
18:03:54 <bh526r> #topic PoC Status
18:04:20 <bh526r> #info Scenario is stable
18:04:38 <bh526r> #info Bin is working on a demo script, and will share with everyone asap
18:04:53 <jinli> Hi all
18:04:58 <bh526r> Hi Jin
18:04:59 <jinli> #info JinLi
18:05:12 <bh526r> Kamil, how about Contrail?
18:05:23 <krenczewski> Yes
18:05:43 <krenczewski> I've resized the disk space, but had to reinstall Contrail
18:06:13 <krenczewski> It is same state as it was previously, but last time I was wrong that is is working correctly
18:06:23 <bh526r> I see
18:06:41 <bh526r> so you are still working to make Contrail work correctly
18:06:48 <krenczewski> I need to investigate this little more as this is very strange behaviour
18:06:57 <bh526r> I see.
18:06:58 <krenczewski> Yes
18:07:07 <bh526r> Thanks for update
18:07:23 <bh526r> #info Kamil has resized disk space and reinstalled Contrail
18:07:49 <bh526r> #info Now it is the same state as it was previously. Contrail is not working properly yet
18:07:51 <krenczewski> Its is weird, every service is up and running but Vrouteere and Contrail-Control appears as non-functioning
18:08:11 <bh526r> #info Kamil will investigate it a little more as this is very strange behavior
18:08:13 <krenczewski> *Vrouter
18:08:51 <bh526r> #info It is weird, every service is up and running, but vRouter and Contrail Control appears non-functioning
18:09:16 <bh526r> #info So Kamil will keep on investigation
18:09:38 <bh526r> BTW, Kamil, did you report Contrail issue to Sukhdev and/r Nachi?
18:10:25 <krenczewski> Not, yet. I'll write e-mail today. I've just finished re-deployment today
18:11:07 <bh526r> I see. Great, and hopefully they can assign someone to help you investigate and debug
18:11:43 <bh526r> Thank you Kamil for hard work
18:12:18 <bh526r> #info Kamil will also report to Contrail team to get more expert help.
18:12:55 <bh526r> #info BGP Peering YAML was approved and merged last week
18:13:18 <bh526r> #info SFC YAML was under review, and will be submitted soon by Georg once he is back from vacation
18:13:49 <bh526r> #info Robert has drafted a simple P2P YAML, and asked Ian for review and comment. No feedback yet
18:13:51 <pcarver> where did the BGP peering YAML end up?
18:14:05 <bh526r> It was approved and merged
18:14:26 <pcarver> I don't see it under https://github.com/openstack/gluon/tree/master/gluon/models are models going somewhere else?
18:14:31 <bh526r> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450917/
18:15:09 <pcarver> oh, I see. You mean as part of the l3vpn API not as a separate model
18:15:12 <bh526r> It updates the original models/net-l3vpn/api.yaml
18:15:35 <pcarver> what's the review URL for the SFC one?
18:15:47 <bh526r> Yes, as part of L3VPN API, not a separate model. But new parameters related to BGP peering is added
18:15:54 <bh526r> SFC is not submitted yet
18:16:05 <pcarver> oh, I thought you said it was under review
18:16:23 <bh526r> Georg is on vacation this week, and the draft is under Ericsson's internal IPR review
18:18:38 <bh526r> #info No update of ELAN either
18:19:52 <bh526r> #info We may use Robert's simple P2P YAML for demo purpose, i.e. add/remove from models/ directory at backend. But it may not be necessary to submit to our repo
18:20:34 <bh526r> That's all of PoC update
18:20:41 <bh526r> any other update from everyone?
18:20:52 <pcarver> Is any of the PoC dependent on Nova or Neutron changes?
18:20:53 <bh526r> #topic Pike Plan
18:21:14 <bh526r> No, no dependency as far as I know
18:22:27 <bh526r> #info Thanks Jin for submitting version management design doc
18:22:42 <bh526r> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456772/
18:23:04 <bh526r> #info It has been reviewed a few times.
18:23:42 <bh526r> #info It is in good shape.
18:23:51 <bh526r> #info Bin and Jin also had a call offline this morning, and Jin will have another patch to make it more complete
18:24:39 <bh526r> #info Once Jin's new patchset is submitted, give all core reviewers 72 hours to have more comments/opinions
18:25:29 <bh526r> #info If no more other opinions, Bin will take the action to approve and merge it. Meanwhile, Jin can start to implement it in parallel to save time.
18:26:24 <bh526r> anything else?
18:28:43 <bh526r> Ok, if nothing else, we can adjourn the meeting and give back everyone 32 minutes
18:28:58 <bh526r> #info Meeting adjourned
18:29:06 <bh526r> #endmeeting