16:00:15 <mugsie> #startmeeting GSLB 16:00:15 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Jul 28 16:00:15 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mugsie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:16 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:19 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'gslb' 16:00:24 <mugsie> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GSLB 16:00:34 <mugsie> whos here? 16:01:19 <mugsie> we should give people a few minutes to join 16:02:23 <santosh> Hi All 16:03:27 <mugsie> o/ 16:03:38 <KunalGandhi> o/ 16:04:13 <xgerman> o/ 16:05:26 <mugsie> ok, i think this is it 16:05:36 <mugsie> #topic Core / Drivers 16:05:59 <mugsie> So, in OpenStack we aim for the following for cores: 16:06:14 <mugsie> A history of contributions to OpenStack 16:06:22 <mugsie> A history of good reviews 16:06:45 <mugsie> and a history of being core elsewhere is a nice bonus 16:07:20 <mugsie> so, based on this, I would like to put forward myself and dougwig as the initial cores for the project 16:07:35 <mugsie> (dougwig is currently on a plane, so can't join today) 16:07:47 <xgerman> we have dougwig on Octavia and LBaaS and never get good work out of him :-) 16:08:02 <mugsie> is there any objections, or alternate proposals? 16:08:57 <mugsie> obviously as people are submitting code, and reviewing code the group will be expanded 16:10:10 <mugsie> any feedback at all? 16:10:15 <KunalGandhi> would it help if an end-user is also part of the core ? 16:10:44 <KunalGandhi> we at eBay have been using GSLB for quite sometime and have implemented GSLB as well in our home grown solution 16:10:48 <xgerman> well, dougwig is pretty busy so expecting meaningful contributions is... 16:10:53 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: core is about core review, not direction - that would be the drivers group 16:11:25 <mugsie> about code review* 16:11:29 <johnsom> I can sign up for reviewing 16:11:30 <sballe> o/ 16:11:30 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie .. is it about who reviews code ? 16:11:51 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: yes 16:11:57 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie ... ok. 16:12:07 <mugsie> drivers are the people who help guide the project 16:12:27 <mugsie> OK, so we have 3 nominations then. 16:12:28 <KunalGandhi> @ ok.. i thought drivers meant GSLB drivers :) 16:12:41 <mugsie> johnsom, me, and dougwig 16:12:57 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: ah - yes, this could get confusing :) 16:13:07 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie .. is there any way i could help ?. 16:13:26 <mugsie> in the drivers group - 100% 16:13:34 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie ... as part of the project for reviewing or may driver group 16:13:37 <KunalGandhi> ok 16:14:03 <mugsie> is there any -1's on the 3 names? 16:14:19 <KunalGandhi> nope. 16:14:29 <mugsie> I dont think we will have a huge amount of code to review initially, so between 2 there should be more than aneough reviewrs 16:14:47 <KunalGandhi> i can sign up for the driver group 16:15:20 <mugsie> #note GSLB-Core is dougwig mugsie johnsom 16:15:34 <johnsom> Sounds good 16:15:35 <mugsie> So drivers - we have KunalGandhi 16:15:50 <mugsie> anyone else interested? I would like to propose the 3 cores as wll 16:15:58 <mugsie> as well* 16:16:06 <xgerman> Congrats!! 16:16:11 <mugsie> making it KunalGandhi johnsom mugsie dougwig 16:16:15 <mugsie> anyone else interested? 16:16:30 <xgerman> I can throw in my 2 cent + we should get blogan 16:16:35 <mugsie> I think that group should be pretty open, to get as much feedback 16:16:46 <mugsie> xgerman: I had no doubt you would :D 16:16:56 <mugsie> blogan: you interested? 16:17:35 <mugsie> OK - we can extend the invite after the meeting 16:17:49 <mugsie> any other nominations? 16:18:20 <xgerman> yeah, let;s also send that to the ML 16:18:39 <mugsie> xgerman: can I action you to do that? 16:18:52 <johnsom> I can take that 16:19:09 <xgerman> #action jonsom send to ML about nominations for drivers groupo 16:19:26 <mugsie> cool. 16:19:32 <mugsie> are we ok to move on? 16:19:38 <xgerman> yep 16:19:42 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie .. can you briefly explain what each group does and is responsible for ? 16:19:48 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: sure 16:20:14 <mugsie> Cores - cores review the code submitted to the project, and ensure it is of good quality 16:20:56 <mugsie> Drivers - they file / maintain / prioritise and target blueprints and bugs for the project 16:21:26 <mugsie> (i.e. decide on project direction, and what is done in each cycle) 16:21:28 <KunalGandhi> that helps.. 16:21:42 <mugsie> #topic API Spec 16:21:57 <mugsie> I moved this to a spec this week, with the feedback from previous meetings 16:22:01 <mugsie> #link https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1 16:22:33 <mugsie> can everyone review, and leave comments. in a few days / week, cores should be looking to merge it 16:22:56 <KunalGandhi> ok.. 16:23:18 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie .. do we know when this would be part of gerrit and openstack repo ? 16:23:25 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: I moved pools down to the root, and added linking members and lbs to them 16:23:49 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: not sure yet, we need to get pinging people. might be a week or 2 16:24:42 <xgerman> yah, there is a lot of commotion on how to do “experimental” projects now as syackforgew is gone 16:24:43 <KunalGandhi> so for contribution, we just fork the repo and send pull requests until then 16:24:54 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: yes 16:25:06 <mugsie> actually - very important note 16:25:24 <mugsie> everyone who submits code must have signed the OpenStack CLA 16:25:49 <mugsie> so cores will need to check this until we get to gerrit, where it is done for us 16:25:55 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie .. i think we need to add the monitor API 16:26:23 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: it is there in the spec (at the bottom) 16:26:31 <mugsie> oh, you mean the JSON snippets? 16:26:38 <mugsie> yes. will do that 16:26:57 <mugsie> anything else on this? 16:27:58 <mugsie> going once ... 16:28:09 <mugsie> twice ... 16:28:17 <mugsie> gone! 16:28:23 <mugsie> #topic Project Name 16:28:23 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie .. stil reading :) 16:28:53 <mugsie> #topic API Spec 16:29:03 <KunalGandhi> @mugsie .. did we add the associate /dissassociate of monitor 16:29:14 <KunalGandhi> i think we had that on the Google doc 16:29:40 <mugsie> that is on the members API 16:29:52 <mugsie> so you add a monitor ID to a pool or pool member 16:31:04 <KunalGandhi> something like PUT /v0.1/pools/<uuid>/pool_members/<uuid>/monitors/monitor_id 16:31:23 <mugsie> yeah, or the monitors will be an array of IDs 16:31:31 <KunalGandhi> ok.. 16:31:37 <mugsie> and use PATCH - but that will be im,plementation semantics 16:31:58 <mugsie> #topic Project Name 16:32:01 <KunalGandhi> also the API spec seems to have a LOT of API's 16:32:09 <KunalGandhi> are we going to implement all of them ? 16:32:14 <KunalGandhi> in MVP 16:32:31 <mugsie> there is only really 3, with bits off them. we may decide to drop some of them 16:32:41 <KunalGandhi> ok 16:33:01 <KunalGandhi> i was looking at the endpoints /v0.1/pools/<uuid>/pool_members/<uuid>/monitors 16:33:08 <KunalGandhi> sorry here.. https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/commit/d804a67cb893a7954625ec21993815cdfc47c037 16:34:11 <KunalGandhi> i think we need a JSON snippet for monitor as well. 16:35:11 <mugsie> KunalGandhi: OK, I will clarify that 16:35:35 <mugsie> anything else? 16:35:37 <KunalGandhi> thanks.. i can work with you on finalizing the API draft 16:35:47 <mugsie> OK then :) 16:35:48 <KunalGandhi> nopw 16:35:52 <mugsie> #topic Project Name 16:35:57 <mugsie> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GSLB_project_name_vote 16:36:09 <mugsie> any other suggestions? 16:36:25 <xgerman> did you check copyrights? Quantum Ahem? 16:36:45 <mugsie> not yet 16:36:46 <mugsie> :) 16:37:01 <johnsom> E-mail away... 16:37:25 <KunalGandhi> nope..have not checked for copyright 16:37:27 <xgerman> the ether pad is slow to open for me today :-( 16:37:54 <KunalGandhi> there is a company callled Globalizer 16:37:57 <KunalGandhi> :( 16:38:03 <mugsie> :( 16:38:05 <KunalGandhi> can we use that then if we had to 16:38:47 <mugsie> OK,do we want to leave it open for 1 more week? 16:38:56 <xgerman> yep 16:38:58 <johnsom> Yes 16:39:03 <KunalGandhi> yes 16:39:15 <mugsie> #action loop back to project name next week 16:39:42 <mugsie> #topic AOB (Any Other Buisiness) 16:39:56 <mugsie> any thing else anyone have for the group? 16:40:16 <KunalGandhi> nope.. 16:41:17 <mugsie> OK, i think that is it :) 16:41:20 <mugsie> #endmeeting