16:00:15 #startmeeting GSLB 16:00:15 Meeting started Tue Jul 28 16:00:15 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mugsie. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:16 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:00:19 The meeting name has been set to 'gslb' 16:00:24 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/GSLB 16:00:34 whos here? 16:01:19 we should give people a few minutes to join 16:02:23 Hi All 16:03:27 o/ 16:03:38 o/ 16:04:13 o/ 16:05:26 ok, i think this is it 16:05:36 #topic Core / Drivers 16:05:59 So, in OpenStack we aim for the following for cores: 16:06:14 A history of contributions to OpenStack 16:06:22 A history of good reviews 16:06:45 and a history of being core elsewhere is a nice bonus 16:07:20 so, based on this, I would like to put forward myself and dougwig as the initial cores for the project 16:07:35 (dougwig is currently on a plane, so can't join today) 16:07:47 we have dougwig on Octavia and LBaaS and never get good work out of him :-) 16:08:02 is there any objections, or alternate proposals? 16:08:57 obviously as people are submitting code, and reviewing code the group will be expanded 16:10:10 any feedback at all? 16:10:15 would it help if an end-user is also part of the core ? 16:10:44 we at eBay have been using GSLB for quite sometime and have implemented GSLB as well in our home grown solution 16:10:48 well, dougwig is pretty busy so expecting meaningful contributions is... 16:10:53 KunalGandhi: core is about core review, not direction - that would be the drivers group 16:11:25 about code review* 16:11:29 I can sign up for reviewing 16:11:30 o/ 16:11:30 @mugsie .. is it about who reviews code ? 16:11:51 KunalGandhi: yes 16:11:57 @mugsie ... ok. 16:12:07 drivers are the people who help guide the project 16:12:27 OK, so we have 3 nominations then. 16:12:28 @ ok.. i thought drivers meant GSLB drivers :) 16:12:41 johnsom, me, and dougwig 16:12:57 KunalGandhi: ah - yes, this could get confusing :) 16:13:07 @mugsie .. is there any way i could help ?. 16:13:26 in the drivers group - 100% 16:13:34 @mugsie ... as part of the project for reviewing or may driver group 16:13:37 ok 16:14:03 is there any -1's on the 3 names? 16:14:19 nope. 16:14:29 I dont think we will have a huge amount of code to review initially, so between 2 there should be more than aneough reviewrs 16:14:47 i can sign up for the driver group 16:15:20 #note GSLB-Core is dougwig mugsie johnsom 16:15:34 Sounds good 16:15:35 So drivers - we have KunalGandhi 16:15:50 anyone else interested? I would like to propose the 3 cores as wll 16:15:58 as well* 16:16:06 Congrats!! 16:16:11 making it KunalGandhi johnsom mugsie dougwig 16:16:15 anyone else interested? 16:16:30 I can throw in my 2 cent + we should get blogan 16:16:35 I think that group should be pretty open, to get as much feedback 16:16:46 xgerman: I had no doubt you would :D 16:16:56 blogan: you interested? 16:17:35 OK - we can extend the invite after the meeting 16:17:49 any other nominations? 16:18:20 yeah, let;s also send that to the ML 16:18:39 xgerman: can I action you to do that? 16:18:52 I can take that 16:19:09 #action jonsom send to ML about nominations for drivers groupo 16:19:26 cool. 16:19:32 are we ok to move on? 16:19:38 yep 16:19:42 @mugsie .. can you briefly explain what each group does and is responsible for ? 16:19:48 KunalGandhi: sure 16:20:14 Cores - cores review the code submitted to the project, and ensure it is of good quality 16:20:56 Drivers - they file / maintain / prioritise and target blueprints and bugs for the project 16:21:26 (i.e. decide on project direction, and what is done in each cycle) 16:21:28 that helps.. 16:21:42 #topic API Spec 16:21:57 I moved this to a spec this week, with the feedback from previous meetings 16:22:01 #link https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/pull/1 16:22:33 can everyone review, and leave comments. in a few days / week, cores should be looking to merge it 16:22:56 ok.. 16:23:18 @mugsie .. do we know when this would be part of gerrit and openstack repo ? 16:23:25 KunalGandhi: I moved pools down to the root, and added linking members and lbs to them 16:23:49 KunalGandhi: not sure yet, we need to get pinging people. might be a week or 2 16:24:42 yah, there is a lot of commotion on how to do “experimental” projects now as syackforgew is gone 16:24:43 so for contribution, we just fork the repo and send pull requests until then 16:24:54 KunalGandhi: yes 16:25:06 actually - very important note 16:25:24 everyone who submits code must have signed the OpenStack CLA 16:25:49 so cores will need to check this until we get to gerrit, where it is done for us 16:25:55 @mugsie .. i think we need to add the monitor API 16:26:23 KunalGandhi: it is there in the spec (at the bottom) 16:26:31 oh, you mean the JSON snippets? 16:26:38 yes. will do that 16:26:57 anything else on this? 16:27:58 going once ... 16:28:09 twice ... 16:28:17 gone! 16:28:23 #topic Project Name 16:28:23 @mugsie .. stil reading :) 16:28:53 #topic API Spec 16:29:03 @mugsie .. did we add the associate /dissassociate of monitor 16:29:14 i think we had that on the Google doc 16:29:40 that is on the members API 16:29:52 so you add a monitor ID to a pool or pool member 16:31:04 something like PUT /v0.1/pools//pool_members//monitors/monitor_id 16:31:23 yeah, or the monitors will be an array of IDs 16:31:31 ok.. 16:31:37 and use PATCH - but that will be im,plementation semantics 16:31:58 #topic Project Name 16:32:01 also the API spec seems to have a LOT of API's 16:32:09 are we going to implement all of them ? 16:32:14 in MVP 16:32:31 there is only really 3, with bits off them. we may decide to drop some of them 16:32:41 ok 16:33:01 i was looking at the endpoints /v0.1/pools//pool_members//monitors 16:33:08 sorry here.. https://github.com/gslb/gslb-specs/commit/d804a67cb893a7954625ec21993815cdfc47c037 16:34:11 i think we need a JSON snippet for monitor as well. 16:35:11 KunalGandhi: OK, I will clarify that 16:35:35 anything else? 16:35:37 thanks.. i can work with you on finalizing the API draft 16:35:47 OK then :) 16:35:48 nopw 16:35:52 #topic Project Name 16:35:57 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/GSLB_project_name_vote 16:36:09 any other suggestions? 16:36:25 did you check copyrights? Quantum Ahem? 16:36:45 not yet 16:36:46 :) 16:37:01 E-mail away... 16:37:25 nope..have not checked for copyright 16:37:27 the ether pad is slow to open for me today :-( 16:37:54 there is a company callled Globalizer 16:37:57 :( 16:38:03 :( 16:38:05 can we use that then if we had to 16:38:47 OK,do we want to leave it open for 1 more week? 16:38:56 yep 16:38:58 Yes 16:39:03 yes 16:39:15 #action loop back to project name next week 16:39:42 #topic AOB (Any Other Buisiness) 16:39:56 any thing else anyone have for the group? 16:40:16 nope.. 16:41:17 OK, i think that is it :) 16:41:20 #endmeeting