08:03:43 <aspiers> #startmeeting ha 08:03:44 <openstack> Meeting started Mon May 23 08:03:43 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is aspiers. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:03:45 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:03:48 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ha' 08:04:02 <aspiers> OK samP only has 10 minutes but I don't think we need long today anyway 08:04:16 <aspiers> I guess he will join any second 08:04:18 <samP_> sorry guys 08:04:26 <aspiers> no problem :) 08:04:33 <aspiers> #topic specs and user story 08:04:38 <aspiers> we can keep it very quick 08:04:41 <aspiers> I don't have much to report anyway 08:04:46 <aspiers> since I was too busy last week 08:04:56 <aspiers> but today I plan to fully review the user story and start writing specs 08:05:13 <aspiers> I think the nova-specs template should be fine 08:05:28 <aspiers> #link https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/newton/template.html can be reused for writing our specs 08:05:32 <samP_> have you attend to VoIP meeting morning? 08:05:47 <ddeja> I was on sick leave last two weeks so I didn't do much, unfortunately 08:05:51 <samP_> with PWG team? 08:05:55 <aspiers> ddeja: sorry to hear that 08:06:05 <aspiers> samP_: I thought PWG meeting was tonight? 08:06:14 <samP_> ah.. ok 08:06:51 <aspiers> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/product-team is the PWG meetings details 08:07:12 <aspiers> there is 10 minutes allocated for the HA VM user story 08:07:28 <ddeja> this week I'll mostly be focused on Mistral, since Renat asked me to cover the problem of ACK after message is processed 08:07:29 <aspiers> so I will try to make sure they have up to date info 08:07:42 <ddeja> aspiers: cool 08:07:51 <aspiers> samP_: did you start writing any specs yet? 08:08:27 <aspiers> I think I will start drafting via etherpad and add links from https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-instance-ha 08:08:46 <samP_> I start VM monitoring sepc. But I coulnt finish it 08:09:03 <aspiers> samP_: cool, could you provide a link to it? 08:09:14 <aspiers> samP_: or copy/paste into a new etherpad? 08:09:26 <aspiers> e.g. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-instance-ha-vm-monitoring-spec 08:09:33 <samP_> Sorry, I cant do it now. 08:09:43 <aspiers> samP_: no rush, I mean when you have time :) 08:09:45 <samP_> I will share it tomorrow. 08:09:49 <aspiers> great, thanks! 08:10:07 <aspiers> ddeja: so you have the host recovery spec assigned to you 08:10:14 <ddeja> aspiers: yup 08:10:17 <aspiers> ddeja: is that still OK? 08:10:22 <ddeja> totaly 08:10:28 <aspiers> great 08:10:44 <aspiers> let's use that nova-specs template 08:10:51 <aspiers> I was also wondering if we should create a blueprint 08:11:01 <samP_> aspiers: +1 08:11:03 <aspiers> it's not clear to me where blueprints fit into the new workflow 08:11:09 <aspiers> I tried to find docs on that but failed 08:11:15 <samP_> +1 for use nova spec 08:11:19 <ddeja> from what I understand 08:11:39 <ddeja> usage of blueprints depends on particular projects 08:11:46 <aspiers> yes that was my understanding too 08:12:00 <aspiers> i.e. some projects use blueprints, some use specs, and some use both - right? 08:12:08 <ddeja> yup 08:12:14 <samP_> nova use both 08:12:30 <aspiers> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/_sources/kilo.blueprints.txt 08:12:39 <aspiers> but this does not exist for later releases 08:14:08 <ddeja> but that doesn't mean that nova is not using blueprints 08:14:18 <aspiers> true, they are still using them 08:14:22 <aspiers> AFAICS 08:17:31 <aspiers> ah, http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/blueprints.html seems to be the latest 08:17:51 <samP_> Really sorry guys. I have to leave now. I will check the log when I come back. so, catch you all in openstack-ha. 08:17:55 <aspiers> although nova is a slightly bigger project than ours ;-) 08:18:01 <aspiers> samP_: no problem at all, thanks for joining! 08:18:07 <samP_> ddeja: get well soon...take care 08:18:15 <ddeja> samP_: thanks! 08:18:24 <samP_> ok then.. 08:19:00 <ddeja> aspiers: from what I see, nova always have blueprints for new features 08:19:04 <ddeja> and sometimes specs 08:19:09 <aspiers> ddeja: yes it seems so 08:19:29 <aspiers> ddeja: any thoughts on whether we should also use blueprints? 08:19:39 <aspiers> I guess that would be tied to a particular project 08:19:51 <aspiers> which maybe we should avoid for now 08:20:04 <aspiers> since we already discussed moving specs around when we understand their per-project impact better 08:20:21 <ddeja> I guess for now we should just use specs 08:20:22 <aspiers> I am probably over-thinking this though :) 08:20:29 <aspiers> yes that should be fine 08:20:39 <aspiers> nova changes are bigger and more complicated 08:20:40 <ddeja> we can write blueprint if writing a spec started to be too complicated 08:20:51 <aspiers> exactly 08:21:10 <ddeja> OK, cool 08:22:07 <ddeja> do we have anything else on agenda? ;) 08:22:44 <aspiers> I don't think so 08:22:47 <aspiers> :) 08:22:52 <aspiers> #topic AOB 08:23:00 <aspiers> seems noone else is here either 08:23:05 <ddeja> yup 08:23:07 <aspiers> I hope I can join the PWG meeting tonight 08:23:35 <ddeja> I'm pretty sure that I couldn't 08:24:59 <aspiers> OK, well if I do, I can report back, e.g. on #openstack-ha 08:25:06 <ddeja> cool 08:25:17 <aspiers> alright, if there's nothing else shall we close the meeting for today? 08:25:54 <ddeja> I guess so 08:25:58 <aspiers> ok 08:26:06 <aspiers> see you on IRC :) 08:26:11 <aspiers> #endmeeting