20:04:15 #startmeeting HA Guide 20:04:16 Meeting started Thu Jun 25 20:04:15 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is megm. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:04:17 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:04:20 The meeting name has been set to 'ha_guide' 20:04:53 :) 20:05:02 #topic review https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/openstack-haguide-update-next-steps 20:05:33 Hello, yamamoto. Are you here for the HA Guide meeting? 20:06:46 Shamail, we may as well start with the "storage" topics, where you own the "big picture" 20:06:48 Looks like a fair amount more of the items have merged 20:06:57 Yes, it was an active weekend ;-) 20:07:43 The current build of the merged docs is at http://docs.openstack.org/draft/ha-guide/index.html 20:07:44 No updates on the storage front from me. I was planning to spend time this week but was unable to do so. I will most likely move forward with doing micro-updates to start making progress 20:07:59 You will be working on this section too right? 20:08:11 Sounds like a plan. 20:08:21 If so, I can put together an outline and send it to you for review (that way we agree on what needs to be covered) 20:08:34 Yes, I'm available for anything. For storage, I put myself down as the writer and you as the brains ;-) 20:08:39 I can then begin filling out the topics in the outline one by one 20:08:44 Excellent! 20:09:03 Sounds like a plan! 20:09:06 Are all of the storage projects only in active/passive ha mode still or have some become active/active? 20:09:26 A/P still due to the lowest layer (the service itself) 20:09:40 I will double-check but that is my understanding as of Kilo 20:09:52 #action shamail outline work packages for storage sections 20:10:28 shamail, the doc I am converting is all active/passive so may be close to accurate. 20:10:37 It's a bit sparse in some areas, however. 20:10:51 Nice. Yeah, I do recall thinking that when walking through it 20:11:01 krtaylor, are you here for the ha-guide meeting? 20:11:03 We still need the net-new section for "Storage Backends" too 20:11:47 Yes, "Storage Backends" needs a lot of work -- do you want a separate action item for that? 20:13:19 shamail, I hope to have the Block Storage section converted today (or tonight). 20:13:33 Great 20:14:16 Radek isn't here but I think he has an eye on the Controller pieces. I suspect we need more resources to help do the work but at least they have a guardian 20:14:48 I'm concerned about some areas that do not have any resourcing, like Nova and Heat. 20:14:58 Trove and Sahara are lower priority. 20:16:40 So is there anything else we can address with just the two of us today? 20:17:39 Shamail, ping? 20:17:50 blah sorry 20:18:20 The areas without resources, can we capture them and send an email to the Documentation ML? 20:18:35 Maybe we could get some writers with expertise in those areas to help out 20:18:44 Is that how it is done? 20:19:24 That's one of the ways. We could send an update on the HA Guide activity and just state where we could use help. I know Matt sent out an email earlier last week but that was a generic call for help. 20:19:27 I think Matt and Nick expected to provide some resourcing from percona and mirantis -- I'm going to give them an action for that 20:19:44 We might get a focused response if we identify a few gap areas in the actual email too 20:19:53 That's a good idea 20:19:55 #action mattgriffin Identify resources available 20:20:10 #action nickchase identify resources available 20:20:17 That's all I had 20:20:51 #action mattgriffin send email to doc mailing list requesting resources, especially for nova and heat 20:21:22 shamail, good point about asking for specific help. 20:21:52 Thanks for chairing. 20:22:01 #action radek identify resources needed for controller topics 20:22:08 Thanks for the cheat sheet ;-) 20:22:28 So are we done? Anyone else have anything to say/ask/contribute? 20:22:53 I guess we're done -- have a great week! 20:22:57 #endmeeting