00:00:10 #startmeeting heat 00:00:10 Meeting started Thu Jan 23 00:00:10 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is stevebaker. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 00:00:11 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 00:00:14 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 00:00:31 #topic rollcall 00:00:49 hi 00:00:57 greetings 00:01:10 hi 00:01:11 hi 00:01:14 hello 00:01:23 liang: welcome! 00:01:45 hi 00:01:52 stevebaker, hehe, finally ;) 00:02:15 we need to get nanjj attending these ones too 00:03:27 will let him know next time 00:03:39 #topic Review last meeting's actions 00:04:01 o/ 00:04:28 Jan 27th Heat Tempest Awesome Fun Day 00:04:39 was the only action 00:05:15 :( I'll be on travel for the Glance summit. 00:05:25 was looking forward to that. 00:05:35 I'm here but only for 10 minutes. 00:05:46 it would be great if everyone could have a day working on tempest. I will point out that our big icehouse-2 regression would have been caught by the tests we already have, if only they ran in the gate 00:06:45 stevebaker: what borked? I missed all of that. 00:07:05 stevebaker: is there a list of _what_ to work on in Tempest? 00:07:20 randallburt: https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1271190 00:07:26 thanks 00:07:27 stevebaker: what? we don't run our tempest tests in the gate? 00:08:15 o/ 00:08:59 zaneb: you can work on what you like. If you've never run tempest locally then give it a go. If you wanted to write a test then it would be a good day to start it. And some of us (at least me) will be trying to get the heat-slow tests running in gate 00:09:27 SpamapS: we run our tests, but not the ones which spawn VMs 00:10:03 stevebaker: _curses_ 00:10:16 SpamapS: you can run them and see what happens by commenting "check experimental" in a gerrit review 00:10:17 stevebaker: well when we have a baremetal cloud in the gate we damn well better run those ;) 00:11:32 given the svelte-gate plans that have just been announced, maybe we should move the experimental gate job to be a non-voting check job on heat soon 00:11:33 stevebaker, so those spawning VMs will be ran after Jan 27th? 00:12:17 liang: they will if we can debug why the test fails in the gate. It could be just timeouts due to booting virt in virt 00:13:20 stevebaker, I see 00:14:21 #topic adding items to the agenda 00:14:28 which is currently very short ;) 00:14:31 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282014-1-23.29 00:15:40 oki, 00:15:45 #topic icehouse-2 release 00:16:35 The wedged gate queue has meant things that should be in i-2 didn't make it, which is a shame but was the least worst option 00:16:58 with the exception of the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1271190 which we really need 00:17:20 so heat will be tagged as soon as https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68135/ is in 00:17:32 please keep an eye on that change and help nurse it through 00:18:08 #topic Open Discussion 00:18:13 stevebaker: Its not an i2, but I haven't had a chance to look more at bug 1206702 due to some family issues that cropped up, but its still on my radar for i3 00:18:25 #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1206702 00:18:44 ok, thanks 00:19:30 liang: so these meetings are usually a little more involved ;) , feel free to bring things you want to discuss 00:19:34 seems pretty quiet for our first alt-time meeting... 00:19:56 Word needs to get out 00:20:03 Give it time. :) 00:20:06 stevebaker, yup 00:20:09 I've updated teh wikis 00:20:44 and I corrected team members on their bad time conversion 00:20:55 lol 00:21:58 so our review queue has been growing and I'm sure part of the reason is an increase in commits 00:22:43 but it feels like core review rate has been quite low recently - I have no numbers to back this up 00:22:47 stevebaker: check queue is also behind so I think commits sit longer while people wait for a +1 from jenkins. 00:23:01 http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-reviewers-30.txt 00:23:12 for me, part of it is that each review is taking longer 00:23:19 Core team size: 11 (avg 1.8 reviews/day) 00:23:23 I think that's mainly because we have lots of new contributors 00:23:24 also http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/heat-openreviews.html 00:23:27 New patch sets in the last 30 days: 725 (24.2/day) 00:23:29 ow 00:23:43 yikes. though that's kinda awesome. 00:23:45 just barely keeping up 00:23:53 stevebaker: SpamapS: mikal also has numbers http://openstack.stillhq.com/reviews/reviewsummary.html?reviewers=asalkeld+clint-fewbar+jpeeler-z+sdake+shardy+steve-stevebaker+tomas-8c8+zaneb&project=__total__ 00:24:06 aw snap 00:24:09 graphssssss 00:24:51 nifty 00:25:14 Queue growth in the last 30 days: 41 (1.4/day) 00:25:44 * asalkeld being a bit slack 00:25:52 anyway, during i-3 there are going to be a lot of features which require good architecture review, and early in the cycle 00:25:54 that tells me that core reviewers need to do 2 more reviews every day to get ahead of things 00:26:44 that web site is not working for me 00:27:02 talk amongst yourselves while I update that chart for current heat-core 00:27:23 asalkeld: me either. blank page 00:27:35 anyway, -> get kids 00:27:36 yip 00:27:48 are you noscripting? 00:28:12 but we may need to start prioritizing new-reviewer-reviewing over reviewing ... 11 is a lot.. but we've got a crazy number of patches 00:28:27 noscript? People still do that? 00:28:40 ;) 00:28:41 * SpamapS out 00:28:43 #link http://openstack.stillhq.com/reviews/reviewsummary.html?reviewers=asalkeld+bartosz-gorski+clint-fewbar+jpeeler-z+Liang+randall-burt+sdake+shardy+steve-stevebaker+therve+zaneb&project=__total__ 00:29:20 I win today :D 00:29:45 * stevebaker gives zaneb the propeller hat 00:30:14 I don't have anything else, shall we finish up? 00:30:41 was there a conclusion? 00:30:46 everybody work harder? 00:30:49 do more reviews. 00:31:00 * randallburt especially :( 00:31:04 the beatings will continue 00:31:36 are we ready for more core? 00:32:03 randallburt: possibly. I'll take a look at the potentials 00:32:15 I might be a little biased because I work with him, but jbd has been doing lots of good work and his numbers are good. 00:32:53 I'm hesitant to nominate because we are on the same team and have the same folks sign our paychecks, though. 00:33:14 yes, I need to do the new-reviewer-reviewing thing. He is top of the list 00:33:19 not sure if that matters. 00:34:27 anything else? 00:34:58 #endmeeting