20:00:15 <asalkeld> #startmeeting heat 20:00:16 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 22 20:00:15 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is asalkeld. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:17 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:20 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 20:00:39 <asalkeld> #topic rollcall 20:00:47 <skraynev_> 0/ 20:00:51 <tspatzier> hi 20:00:52 <zaneb> o/ 20:00:57 <ryansb> o/ 20:01:01 <msly> o/ 20:01:01 <KarolynChambers> o/ 20:01:01 <asalkeld> o/ 20:01:12 <stevebaker> \o 20:01:43 <jdandrea> po/ 20:01:44 <jdandrea> o/ 20:01:51 <asalkeld> #topic Adding items to the agenda 20:02:28 <jorgedr> Hi 20:02:50 <asalkeld> maybe gate status, I think it looks good now? 20:03:22 <asalkeld> anything else? 20:04:05 <asalkeld> nope, i'll move on 20:04:16 <asalkeld> #topic rc2 20:04:48 <asalkeld> #link 20:04:53 <asalkeld> #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/kilo-rc2 20:05:16 <asalkeld> so we have only today to get those patches merged 20:05:29 <pas-ha> o/ 20:05:39 <asalkeld> ttx said that we should cut rc2 later today 20:05:46 <asalkeld> AFAIK 20:05:49 <ttx> not today 20:05:58 <asalkeld> phew 20:05:59 <ttx> well, maybe YOUR today 20:06:14 <asalkeld> ok, that might be the confusion, so tomorrow? 20:06:26 <asalkeld> x hours time? 20:06:47 <zaneb> Thursday 20:06:56 <zaneb> ? 20:07:10 <asalkeld> zaneb: he is in a release meeting too 20:07:34 <asalkeld> i'd assume in ~1/2 a day 20:08:00 <asalkeld> anyways we look in good shape 20:08:01 <zaneb> asalkeld: what about the other stuff in https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bugs?field.tag=kilo-rc-potential 20:08:11 <zaneb> looks like a much longer list 20:08:40 <asalkeld> so it must be in merged in master 20:08:54 <stevebaker> has the tag been removed for those which have landed in stable/kilo? 20:09:05 <asalkeld> that list is things that have already been merged 20:09:20 <zaneb> I count 10 in Fix Committed state 20:09:26 <asalkeld> no, i haven't removed 20:09:26 <zaneb> only 9 in that list 20:09:42 <zaneb> I'll review after and see if I can spot the discrepancy 20:09:42 <asalkeld> some we left out as they had string changes 20:09:46 <asalkeld> and were minor 20:09:54 <zaneb> ok, cool 20:10:21 <asalkeld> ttx and i went through the list 20:10:35 <asalkeld> getting really late to add more 20:10:50 <asalkeld> so must be super important to add 20:11:03 <zaneb> that's sounds fine, as long as it has been reviewed 20:11:12 <stevebaker> I assume it would take a high priority bug to justify an rc3? 20:11:25 <asalkeld> yeah 20:11:28 <asalkeld> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/176344/2/heat/engine/clients/os/nova.py 20:11:49 <asalkeld> *maybe* that one ^ 20:12:17 <asalkeld> tho' just seen it, need to see what it does 20:12:36 <stevebaker> I've just approved it, seems fine 20:13:09 <asalkeld> do we have a new novaclient release? 20:13:23 <asalkeld> (just woke up, no chance to look) 20:13:44 <zaneb> stevebaker: I wonder how many other clients we're using like that 20:14:37 <stevebaker> zaneb: we should check, and periodically look at how horizon does it 20:15:09 <zaneb> the way we did it seemed wrong, even back in 2012 20:15:49 <asalkeld> ok, should we move on? any more rc2 issues 20:16:03 <asalkeld> #topic gate status 20:16:16 <asalkeld> anyone know how the gate was fixed? 20:16:21 * asalkeld just curious 20:16:28 <stevebaker> which problem? 20:17:07 <zaneb> asalkeld: reverted the patch in novaclient and re-released afaik 20:17:26 <asalkeld> ok, so new novaclient 20:17:48 <stevebaker> 2.24.1 20:18:02 <asalkeld> cool 20:18:13 <asalkeld> #topic open discussion 20:18:58 <stevebaker> I need to go soon, but feel free to keep adding ideas to https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-heat-sessions and I'll start to put together a proposed schedule for discussion 20:19:42 <asalkeld> we might need one or two working room discussions 20:19:47 <asalkeld> more 20:20:10 <stevebaker> or just make it all convergence again ;) 20:20:11 <asalkeld> one might be cross test heat and the clients 20:20:58 <stevebaker> how helpful would be an in-person code review session be? 20:20:59 <asalkeld> that too 20:21:13 <asalkeld> stevebaker: of what code? 20:21:35 <inc0> we'll do hackathon day before;) 20:21:39 <ryansb> stevebaker: like "how to review code" session, or "come bring your patches and we'll have a review fest"? 20:21:41 <stevebaker> asalkeld: whatever is in the queue which would benefit from in-person review 20:21:50 <asalkeld> ok 20:21:50 <stevebaker> ryansb: the latter 20:21:58 <ryansb> that sounds neat 20:21:59 <asalkeld> sure 20:22:17 <stevebaker> just an idea 20:22:51 <stevebaker> i need to do the school run now - I should be back for the last 5 minutes if you're still going 20:23:05 * asalkeld doubts it 20:23:16 <asalkeld> running out of steam already 20:23:34 <inc0> meetings are short this close to summit 20:24:15 <asalkeld> should i wrap up? 20:24:25 <skraynev_> inc0: indeed :) 20:24:29 <zaneb> +1 20:24:33 <asalkeld> #endmeeting