20:00:37 #startmeeting heat 20:00:37 Meeting started Wed Jul 29 20:00:37 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is stevebaker. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00:38 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 20:00:40 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 20:00:55 #topic rollcall 20:02:01 hi all 20:02:27 tspatzier: its just you and me so far :) 20:02:35 Hi 20:02:36 zaneb: ping 20:02:38 hi stevebaker 20:02:40 hi :-) 20:02:40 o/ 20:02:42 o/ 20:02:49 whew 20:02:53 ah, others rolling in 20:03:20 hi 20:03:48 #topic adding items to the agenda 20:03:52 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282015-07-29_2000_UTC.29 20:04:56 #topic heat reviews https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-reviews 20:05:28 removed my patch from that list. thanks, stevebaker! 20:05:39 randallburt: ok 20:06:14 stevebaker: looks like the designate stuff can fall off too; I'll remove 20:06:23 specs are merging 20:07:00 hey y'all 20:07:32 I mean *a* spec has merged 20:08:27 it would be cool if somebody could have a look at my spec regarding multi-region testing (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/185598/) 20:08:32 I am still working on the required changes to openstack-infra, but as soon as this is done i would like to start with the test 20:09:53 stevebaker, zaneb: could we also add ASG/RG refactoring in this list? 20:10:07 skraynev_: sounds like a good idea 20:10:27 dgonzalez: have you talked to infra about a multi region gate setup? 20:10:44 yes, and i am already working on it with them 20:10:48 yeah, I +1'd the rolling-update-for-RG patch already. would be good to get some more core eyes 20:11:49 stevebaker: added 20:12:22 stevebaker: see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/200309/ for my proposal to add multi-region support to devstack-gate 20:12:27 dgonzalez: sounds like a reasonable plan 20:12:47 #topic 20:12:50 um 20:12:54 #topic Liberty-2 status 20:13:03 zaneb: I plan to look on it tomorrow. do you know that in the last patch we remove inheritance between ASG and RG ? 20:13:16 #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/liberty-2 20:13:29 zaneb: I was surprised, when review it :) 20:13:45 skraynev_: yes, removing inheritance is a Good Thing IMHO. it's everything else I'm worried about ;) 20:14:00 We're looking in a reasonable state. If you've completed something which isn't on this list then feel free to update the blueprint status and milestone 20:14:34 If you have a fix for a bug which you think should be in l-2 then set its milestone 20:15:00 otherwise we'll likely tag l-2 in the next day or so 20:15:23 stevebaker: +1. I think, that we ready 20:16:18 #topic heat:bundled tag for projects with heat resources 20:16:50 there is currently a proposal for a devstack tag which can be assigned to projects that have devstack support 20:17:14 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/203785/2/reference/tags/devstack.rst,cm 20:17:56 Once that lands I think we should adopt whatever convention is agreed upon and propose a similar tag for heat 20:18:14 which would be applied to projects that have heat resources in-tree 20:18:24 stevebaker: that is the plan 20:18:45 we're using this one as a test-case to figure out the shape of these tags 20:18:57 then there will be a bunch more proposed 20:19:30 yep, and since we have criteria for resources landing in-tree, I assume applying the tag will be just rubber-stamping 20:19:54 yeah, should be simple in our case 20:20:06 although you could argue about coverage 20:20:24 if a project has resources for half of their API, does that count? &c. 20:20:34 in practice I'm not too worried 20:20:46 we may need some criteria that the resources do "something useful" 20:21:38 given that we are talking about in-tree stuff (as opposed to devstack), I think it's reasonable for the Heat PTL to be required to sign off 20:21:55 for example, a designate domain resource wouldn't be much use without the record resource 20:23:13 zaneb: yep, I think the TC should be relieved of the need to ever make a judgement call 20:23:45 indeed. we can make the judgement call if one is required 20:24:06 resounding agreement, lets move on 20:24:10 in practice, I don't think projects will view this as a box-ticking exercise 20:24:17 #topic Open Discussion 20:24:21 either they care about Heat support or they don't 20:25:18 Angus has raised a concern about review velocity. Is there a feeling that we could do with more cores? 20:26:27 things are landing, but there are a couple of people who could benefit heat by being core 20:27:37 * stevebaker nominates crickets and tumbleweeds to core 20:28:26 so nominations are in order then? I don't see why we wouldn't 20:28:36 reviewstats is down 20:29:10 http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/90 20:29:16 #link http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/heat-group/90 20:29:57 note, that it's statistic for 90 days period 20:30:25 thanks :) 20:31:14 zaneb: np ;) 20:31:41 ok, expect a nomination email soon 20:32:02 thats all I've got, any more open discussion? 20:33:11 stevebaker: suggestion to make more review for refactor ASG/RG and convergence :) 20:33:21 nothing else 20:33:57 skraynev_: +1 20:34:30 lets wrap up, and reconvene in the #heat 20:34:35 #endmeeting