07:00:38 <skraynev> #startmeeting heat 07:00:39 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb 17 07:00:38 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is skraynev. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 07:00:40 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 07:00:43 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 07:00:53 <skraynev> #topic rollcall 07:01:09 <stevebaker> \o 07:01:20 <ananta> o/ 07:01:21 <skraynev> ramishra, shardy 07:01:36 <skraynev> jdob 07:01:38 <elynn> o/ 07:01:57 <skraynev> neelashah: ping 07:03:09 <skraynev> #topic Adding items to agenda 07:03:22 <skraynev> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282016-02-17_0700_UTC.29 07:03:38 <stevebaker> skraynev: heat osc commands? 07:04:03 <skraynev> stevebaker: do you have updates ? 07:04:25 <stevebaker> skraynev: yep 07:04:31 <skraynev> stevebaker: ok. added 07:04:49 <ramishra> hi 07:05:11 <skraynev> ramishra: hi 07:05:24 <skraynev> ok. we can start 07:05:42 <skraynev> #topic Spec-lite review request 07:05:55 <skraynev> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/heat/+bug/1545857 07:05:55 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1545857 in heat "Add a heat.type constraint" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Jay Dobies (jdob) 07:06:11 <stevebaker> our first spec-lite? 07:06:21 <skraynev> I think about moving it to heat-next and landing in N 07:06:24 <skraynev> stevebaker: yeah :) 07:06:50 <stevebaker> a new constraint is fairly low risk though if he can land it for m 07:07:15 <ramishra> +1 07:07:47 <stevebaker> I (ahem) may be writing my own spec-lite for M tomorrow 07:08:02 <skraynev> lol 07:08:16 <stevebaker> just a tiny little feature 07:08:25 <skraynev> I have not enough time for reviewing all of it ;) 07:09:26 <ramishra> btw, can we get the spec-lite contrib guidelines in too;) reviews appreciated https://review.openstack.org/#/c/271177/ 07:09:30 <skraynev> stevebaker; k. let's try. I think, that I may reduce some uncomplete bugs on the next meeting 07:10:04 <skraynev> stevebaker: the another interesting question: can we merge spec-lite after FF ? 07:10:13 <skraynev> ramishra: ^ 07:10:55 <stevebaker> skraynev: you mean the feature itself? I'd assume feature freeze rules would apply 07:12:06 <skraynev> stevebaker: yes. it's a bit confusing, that launchpad will show this as a bug, not BP 07:13:30 <skraynev> stevebaker: but I think, that we can deal with it ;) 07:13:38 <ramishra> skraynev: it would be of importance wishlist. IMO we should handle it like a feature with FF. 07:13:51 <ramishra> skraynev: though we can check with glance team how they are doing it. 07:13:52 <stevebaker> I guess as soon as we hit ff the spec-lite bugs get kicked to the next milestone 07:14:02 <stevebaker> unless they have a ffe 07:14:19 <skraynev> ramishra: stevebaker: kk 07:14:47 <skraynev> stevebaker: do I need ping someone about potential ffe ? 07:15:09 <stevebaker> I think its basically up to us these days 07:15:15 <stevebaker> us==PTL 07:15:57 <skraynev> heh. ok 07:17:00 <skraynev> #topic LBaaS v2 support in Heat 07:17:10 <skraynev> so it's a good candidate for ffe 07:17:39 <elynn> I think most of codes for LBaaS v2 are submitted. 07:17:49 <elynn> Waiting for more reviews. 07:18:00 <stevebaker> agreed, its self contained, being actively reviewed 07:18:04 <ananta> i tested the lbaasv2 and basic things work with the changes i suggested 07:18:10 <skraynev> elynn: yes, but I still wait +1 from Jenkins without -1 from reviewers 07:18:27 <skraynev> ananta: cool. thank you 07:18:44 <elynn> That's great. 07:19:07 <skraynev> update priority to High 07:19:27 <elynn> Just make sure this feature can be merged in m-3 :) 07:19:59 <elynn> Thanks skraynev :) 07:20:28 <ananta_> skraynev: I am following up 07:20:45 <skraynev> #topic OSC commands 07:21:08 <skraynev> stevebaker: it's your show time :) 07:21:26 <stevebaker> only 5 commands need to land, but I've been writing some enhancement changes too https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient 07:21:59 <skraynev> stevebaker: I have seen that more then 50 % merged, but I spent a lot of time for reviewing merged patches (to understand how it should looks like) 07:22:17 <skraynev> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient 07:22:32 <stevebaker> so stuff is happening, but there is only a week to go 07:22:57 <stevebaker> I finally started the "stack failures list" command https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280963/ 07:23:05 <stevebaker> will finish the unit tests tomorrow 07:23:10 <skraynev> stevebaker: more over, I think about updating output-show and output list with supporting new API too 07:24:02 <stevebaker> skraynev: +1, although if it doesn't change the UI that could be a stable-backportable bug fix 07:25:04 <skraynev> stevebaker: yeah. it's already work for old cli, but we need to use the same approach for osc methods 07:25:26 <skraynev> stevebaker: do you want to land "stack failures list" before 1.0.0 ? 07:25:38 <stevebaker> I'd like to 07:25:58 <skraynev> ok. just wanted to clarify 07:26:29 <stevebaker> I've got nothing else on this topic, unless someone else has 07:27:47 <skraynev> nothing from my side :) it looks like a really awesome works was done and we need to finish it and then drink a beer 07:28:01 <stevebaker> I know, I'm amazed 07:29:01 <skraynev> #topic amazing stevebaker ;) 07:29:05 <skraynev> oops 07:29:17 <stevebaker> hur 07:29:22 <skraynev> #topic M3 status 07:29:41 <skraynev> #link https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/mitaka-3 07:30:12 <skraynev> so we have a big numbers of BP 07:30:20 <skraynev> and also a lot of bugs for m3 07:30:41 <skraynev> I think, that we should finish BP first of all and then focus on bugs during preparing for rc1 07:31:35 <skraynev> elyn: what's about senlin resources? 07:31:48 <elynn> most codes are submitted 07:31:49 <skraynev> I have seen two new on review + constraints 07:32:10 <elynn> No more resources needed to add. 07:32:10 <skraynev> do you plan to add more resources ? 07:32:34 <elynn> But I will add some templates to heat-templates later. 07:32:41 <skraynev> elynn: it's ok 07:33:45 <skraynev> please make sure, that it will land during this and next week 07:34:17 <skraynev> I will also ping personally all BP assignee and ask status. 07:35:06 <ramishra> update restrict functional tests have a dependency on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/248676/, but it seems to be stuck with unrelated gate failures(number of rechecks) 07:36:04 <skraynev> ramishra: is't failures related with changes? 07:36:14 <ramishra> skraynev: nope 07:36:40 <skraynev> unexpected API error... 07:36:52 <ramishra> I'll try one more time 07:36:55 <skraynev> I have seen such error early 07:37:08 <skraynev> ramishra: yeah. please do it 07:38:24 <skraynev> ramishra: also it looks like good tome to ping shardy and anant to look on other patches 07:38:37 <skraynev> related with restrict update for convergence case 07:38:40 <ramishra> some patches seem to be going through a cycle of errors at times;) 07:38:44 <skraynev> and functional tests 07:39:02 <skraynev> ramishra: yeah. I know. 07:39:04 <skraynev> btw... 07:39:13 <ramishra> yeah will do that today. Expecting to get it approved today. 07:39:16 <ramishra> :) 07:39:57 <skraynev> stevebaker: ramishra: elynn: please review this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/280129/ 07:40:13 <stevebaker> sure 07:40:16 <skraynev> it's one of frequently error on the gate 07:40:32 <elynn> will do 07:40:41 <skraynev> we discussed it with therve and it loks like should fix one of blockers and makes gate more stable 07:40:46 <skraynev> thx guys 07:42:15 <skraynev> #topic Open discussion 07:43:56 <skraynev> do we have anything else for discussion? 07:44:21 * ricolin come here very late 07:44:34 <skraynev> if no, let's try to review all High priority patches ;) 07:44:51 <elynn> :) 07:44:57 <skraynev> ricolin: no. you come at the best moment 07:45:16 <ricolin> review!!:) 07:45:16 <skraynev> moment, when I can say: please review high priority patches ;) 07:45:21 <skraynev> yes ;) 07:45:30 <skraynev> ricolin: this one https://launchpad.net/heat/+milestone/mitaka-3 07:45:37 <ricolin> on it 07:45:54 <skraynev> or try to focus on lbaas or osc https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/heat-support-python-openstackclient 07:46:11 <skraynev> ricolin: great. we need your +2 ;) 07:46:20 <skraynev> and -1 too :) 07:46:34 <ricolin> and please help to review this 07:46:35 <ricolin> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/252201/ 07:47:31 <ricolin> tempest team still waiting for this patch to get merge before they put their patch 07:47:41 <ricolin> so we're waiting for each otehr 07:48:47 <skraynev> ricolin: Oh I remember this one. I will take i a look 07:49:14 <skraynev> let's continue in #heat 07:49:29 <skraynev> thanks everyone 07:49:36 <skraynev> #endmeeting