15:00:41 #startmeeting heat 15:00:42 Meeting started Wed Mar 8 15:00:41 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ricolin. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:44 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:46 The meeting name has been set to 'heat' 15:00:55 #topic roll call 15:01:23 hola 15:01:26 Hi 15:01:36 o/ 15:01:50 Hi 15:02:07 hi all 15:02:25 I thought, that number 4 will be used :) 15:02:29 o/ 15:03:48 #topic adding items to agenda 15:03:54 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/HeatAgenda#Agenda_.282017-03-08_1500_UTC.29 15:07:05 #topic gate stable issue 15:07:33 We have been broken by requirements, docs, and neutron lib this week, after all fixed the gate still not that stable as it should be... 15:08:01 and zaqarclient I believe 15:08:30 zaneb right... 15:09:10 I think we're impacted by the poor performance of the infra 15:09:25 But yeah the unauthorized issue is something we should investigate 15:10:02 therve: this one? http://logs.openstack.org/15/442215/3/check/gate-heat-dsvm-functional-convg-mysql-lbaasv2-ubuntu-xenial/9459e15/console.html#_2017-03-08_09_59_23_633135 15:10:05 therve do you think that have something to do with token expired? 15:10:16 zaneb, Yep 15:10:39 ricolin, But tokens don't expire that quickly. 15:10:51 I've seen messages about trusts expiring 15:11:03 was just looking at that 15:11:03 Which doesn't make sense as we don't make them expire 15:11:11 it's worth noting that isn't the first error 15:11:30 in all 3 tests that failed, the first error was a timeout 15:11:34 "failed to reach DELETE_COMPLETE status within the required time (1200 s)" 15:11:58 Identity response: {"error": {"message": "Failed to validate token", "code": 404, "title": "Not Found"}} 15:16:35 I guess the action is to investigate till we have more clue about this one? 15:17:58 Yes 15:18:15 #topic interop defining tests 15:18:15 +1 15:18:35 s/interop/interupt/ 15:18:52 We have to define both API and function test cases for interop, I think we already have API test ready, so we should figure out what should be in the function test. Any idea? 15:21:47 Actually it means any tests to let user to define they have heat running~ 15:21:52 ricolin: ricolin, could you please clarify what do we need to do with tests? 15:22:49 skraynev yes, I have alredy write mail to ask for more detail in doc 15:22:56 I'd say at a minimum, create a stack with a server, volume, ports 15:23:29 skraynev nothing response yet 15:25:28 zaneb yes, you said that in PTG, will make sure that's in the tests 15:25:31 ricolin, I will try to find it.thx 15:26:30 skraynev thx :) 15:28:15 I think we will go with that minimum setting if no other more required to add in to the default set 15:28:53 #topic Open discussion 15:29:18 anything would like to discuss? 15:30:33 is the stable/ocata gate issue the same one we have on master? 15:31:23 I just want to notify you guys, that I will use another mail instead of known skraynev@mirantis.com ;) Because we have got the new wave of the layoffs. 15:31:38 so I will use sergejyit@gmail.com 15:33:49 skraynev Hope everything well for you. I'm also just change my mail too 15:34:12 wow. what did happen with you ? 15:34:47 zaneb I'm not sure which patch you mean 15:35:47 ricolin: I suppose, that the question was about current state of the gates. Is the same for stable and for master branches ? 15:35:57 or we have not such issue in master ? 15:36:36 ricolin: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442652/ looks to be the same as master 15:37:15 but all stable/ocata patches have been struggling 15:37:47 it took forever to get https://review.openstack.org/437906 to merge and that was supposed the fix the gate 15:39:13 zaneb you're right, that seems the same issue 15:40:24 it's gonna be one of those weeks 15:41:42 * zaneb moves that we wrap up this meeting and go back to debugging the gate in #heat 15:42:07 yes 15:42:23 #endmeeting