16:02:33 #startmeeting hierarchical_multitenancy 16:02:34 Meeting started Fri Aug 21 16:02:33 2015 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is schwicke. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:35 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:02:37 The meeting name has been set to 'hierarchical_multitenancy' 16:02:58 whom do we have for today ? 16:03:31 Hi 16:03:32 o/ 16:03:56 Hi, ericksonsantos! 16:05:04 hi, vilobhmm 16:05:12 hi all 16:05:17 hi schwicke 16:05:33 sorry was on my way to work 16:05:51 no problem! 16:06:00 hi 16:06:00 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205369/ 16:06:24 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206171/12 16:06:26 yes https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205369/ and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/206171/12 are in good shape and need 16:06:28 review 16:06:33 from the core team IMHO 16:06:33 +1 16:06:38 +1 16:06:52 Sean was taking a look these days 16:06:57 maybe he'll look again soon 16:07:10 hope so 16:07:18 so erick and I would appreciate if you can help us so that core team can prioritize this 16:07:59 I was just wondering about eg the Huawei Volume CI check tests 16:08:20 if jenkins says +1 we should be good 16:08:24 schwicke : ^^ 16:08:45 They seem to be non-voting but are not marked as such 16:09:16 vilobhmm1, ++ 16:09:33 ok 16:09:56 I think we should ensure that the cores are on the reviewer list 16:10:06 so action item can be schwicke to help prioratize nested quta patches with cinder core 16:10:32 eric nd vilobhmm can fix any technical stuff 16:10:40 yes 16:10:58 would be good to have Tim in the boat. His voice may have a higher weight than mine but he's still on holidays 16:11:03 I don't think that just put the cores on the reviewer list is gonna work 16:11:38 schwicke : sure whatever wrks 16:11:56 ericksonsantos : +2 16:12:10 He should be back on Monday. 16:13:05 schwicke, nice 16:13:27 schwicke : cool 16:13:59 anybody from the cores apart from Sean who expressed interest and who may sponsor us ? 16:14:01 as per the requirement by the core team we have patches in good state i.e. +1 16:14:32 I dont think so 16:15:26 even if you see this etherpad https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-liberty-3-reviews 16:15:44 schwicke : ^^ 16:15:44 vilobhmm1, yes, I was going to say the same 16:16:25 action: schwicke will update Tim on the status and ask him to help pushing the patches forward 16:16:42 cool 16:17:00 trying again :) 16:17:16 schwicke, thanks :) 16:17:18 #action schwicke will update Tim on the status and ask him to help pushing the patches forward 16:17:41 meanwhile I think it would make sense to : 16:18:01 1/ make things even more green (at least those tests which are not marked as non-voting) 16:18:22 2/. prepare a patch which would activate delegation 16:18:30 * rodrigods sneaking in the back of the room 16:18:47 sure, I'll take a look at those tests, if there is something related to our code, we can fix 16:18:58 great! 16:19:30 #action check if remaining failures are related to our patches and fix if needed 16:19:34 schwicke, what do you mean by point 2? 16:20:06 I didnt get it either 16:20:20 the discussion we had offline about the fact that only the admins of the root project can update quotas 16:20:46 we have changed the code 16:20:50 schwicke, we have already addressed that. 16:20:57 Ah, ok. 16:21:05 to include ROOT admin as well as the immediate parent ROOT admin to perform update/delete 16:21:28 somehow I missed that you fixed the code already :) 16:21:31 we took that decision and went ahead…everything is in place as of now 16:21:45 We just have to ensure that the default configuration is such that the requirements are met 16:21:52 yes 16:21:59 perfect! 16:23:00 There is no agenda yet for the next cinder meeting 16:23:32 we should keep an eye on this and try to participate. 16:24:04 I'm still unsure if it is a good idea to ask them to discuss this change in the meeting or not 16:24:13 Opinions welcome 16:24:41 not in the meeting but if someone is specifically assigned for review that also works IMHO 16:25:01 meetings r too short for such a complex review IMHO 16:25:18 I agree with vilobhmm1 on this 16:26:19 ok 16:27:00 alrite then I have an internal meeting that I need to attend…please ping me if anything is needed 16:27:38 ok 16:27:43 thanks all ! 16:27:55 thanks :) 16:28:01 Yes, I think we are good for today. 16:28:07 not much more to be discussed 16:28:15 Well done, guys! 16:28:37 #endmeeting