15:00:05 #startmeeting horizon 15:00:05 Meeting started Wed Aug 24 15:00:05 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vishalmanchanda. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 15:00:05 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 15:00:06 The meeting name has been set to 'horizon' 15:01:05 o/ 15:01:29 hello 15:01:37 hi 15:03:20 agenda of meeting can be found here https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-release-priorities#L39 15:04:27 let's start the meeting 15:04:42 #topic Notices 15:05:07 A casual reminder about schedule. 15:05:20 This week is R-6 week. 15:05:54 Next week is feature freeze week but horizon follows the intermediary releases model. 15:06:43 So we can accept code till R2 week(Sep 19 - Sep 23), but please let me know in advance if you are working on any bp/bug which you want to get merged in the zed release. 15:07:19 We can't accept more patches after R2 week until it is a critical bug or gate fix. 15:07:56 For more info about schedules please refer https://releases.openstack.org/zed/schedule.html 15:08:48 I have no other announcements to make if anyone has any announcements to make. please go ahead 15:09:32 moving to the next topic 15:09:41 #topic Release priorities 15:09:59 Xstatic angular migartion to 1.8.2 15:10:19 Now migration to angularjs v1.8.2 is completed. 15:10:44 Only one patch is left to merge. 15:10:56 https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:angular_updates 15:11:32 Can I have reviews on this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/852655 15:11:59 e0ne: amotoki :tmazur:rdoperia:^^ 15:12:38 vishalmanchanda: ack 15:12:57 Also, this one https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/845133 15:13:00 amotoki: thanks. 15:14:40 vishalmanchanda: is it okay to merge the job template update? magnum-ui npm test failure looks due to angular version, so it looks no problem. 15:14:43 Now I am working on fixing horizon with JQuery-Migrate=3.3.2.1 15:15:08 I am trying to reproduce issue in my local env. 15:15:27 That's all update from my side for this week. 15:16:13 amotoki: yeah, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum-ui/+/847073 fix npm test failure. 15:16:27 amotoki: so looks ok to merge job template. 15:18:08 vishalmanchanda: if horizon drops nodejs14 template, how can we run magnum-ui npm job for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum-ui/+/847073? 15:18:47 vishalmanchanda: is it better to merge magnum-ui angular fix first? or can we merge them in any order? 15:19:32 amotoki: ok let's wait for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/magnum-ui/+/847073 to merge 15:19:52 then we can drop nodejs14 template in horizon. 15:20:30 847072 then 841322 in magnum-ui and finally 845133 in horizon, right? 15:21:15 amotoki: yeah. 15:21:27 vishalmanchanda: thanks for confirmation :) 15:21:43 amotoki: yw. 15:22:01 That's all update from my side for this week. 15:22:12 moving to next topic 15:22:22 #topic open-discussion 15:22:45 tobias-urdin: please go ahead. 15:23:26 I have that patch to make endpoint type for keystone interaction configurable 15:23:48 I added a long description on why we need/have that today 15:24:35 so I'm looking for feedback on it, if it's acceptable or not, if I can make any changes (like making it more generic i.e not only for keystone) for it to be acceptable (a dict for each service type to specify endpoint type or smth like that) 15:25:16 #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/844574 15:25:25 tobias-urdin: sorry for my delay. I will check it and give feedbacks this week. 15:25:40 ack, no worries 15:25:53 thanks 15:25:56 that was all :) 15:26:44 I originally just would like to clarify the linked gerrit change is not intended to change the existing behavior and it is just to fix the inconsistency. 15:27:13 you updated the description now, so I would like to understand it carefully :-) 15:27:30 at a glance, it makes sense 15:29:16 Do we have any other topic to discuss, or we can end this meeting? 15:29:16 vishalmanchanda: could you review it too? more eyes would be appreciated. 15:29:17 ack, let me know what you think, there is no rush – I'm open to any adjustments required to make it acceptable :) 15:29:47 tobias-urdin: thanks 15:30:25 amotoki: I am fine with his patch, actually I have seen a usecase like this in actual deployment. 15:31:02 vishalmanchanda: okay. so it's my turn now. got it 15:32:03 no more topic from me 15:32:20 ok let's end this meeting. 15:32:40 Thanks everyone for joining, See you next week. 15:32:47 Take Care! 15:33:00 #endmeeting