08:00:07 #startmeeting horizondrivers 08:00:08 Meeting started Wed Jun 8 08:00:07 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is robcresswell. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 08:00:09 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 08:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'horizondrivers' 08:00:44 o/ 08:00:46 Anyone around for drivers meeting? 08:00:50 another quiet meeting 08:00:50 morning tsufiev 08:01:01 morning, robcresswell 08:01:25 Yeah, there's no agenda again either. Probably could've cancelled the meeting had I checked earlier. 08:01:44 oh, I have one item in case you don't mind 08:01:50 of course, go ahead 08:01:55 the question is if we have quorum :)? 08:02:19 ha, might be better to bring it up in the evening meeting 08:02:34 well, just in case, it's a pretty old one https://blueprints.launchpad.net/horizon/+spec/add-policy-rules-to-workflow-actions 08:03:20 now, with all the momentum around Angular stuff it's not clear even to me, if we should pursue improving some aspects of Django-based Horizon 08:03:38 As always *it depends* 08:03:39 'even to me' - speaking specifically of this patch 08:04:07 ok... so, move to evening discussion? 08:04:07 I don't expect angular to replace all of Django within the next 2 cycles, probably. It doesnt have the momentum to do so. 08:04:30 So, its usually beneficial to add improvements to the django side 08:04:42 that's good to hear 08:05:47 but yes, we can discuss further this evening 08:05:51 I also had a couple of other changes that still seem to add value to Django and have been overlooked for some time 08:06:19 what would you say if I added them to n-2 milestone, to draw more attention? 08:06:32 which ones? 08:06:39 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/144153/ 08:06:42 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215277/ 08:07:08 not sure if they're eligible for discussion at a blueprint meeting, but anyways it's not stuffed with topics :) 08:07:40 Ah interesting 08:07:47 yep, go for it 08:08:01 both are hanging in gerrit for quite a long time, I'd like to either merge or abandon them 08:09:01 Sure, target to n-2 08:09:02 so, Nova quotas change should be a useful patch in case Nova quotas are disabled 08:09:06 okay, will do! 08:09:41 hi guys, I have a question here. 08:09:49 As I know openstack-sdk is a collection library to call openstack apis. 08:10:00 So do we think about to use openstack-sdk instead of ***-client in horizon? 08:10:25 hm... 08:10:34 There's no real reason to, right now. The support it does have is often not complete across services 08:10:38 apart from keystone perhaps 08:10:57 as for me, it's the first time I hear about the thing 08:11:09 openstackclient? 08:11:20 openstack-sdk 08:11:29 https://github.com/openstack/python-openstacksdk 08:11:32 Yeah I think wangbo is referring to the unified client 08:11:46 As in, openstack rather than neutron etc 08:11:53 no, seems to be a different thing 08:12:07 hmm 08:13:25 wangbo: What would be the reasoning for using it? 08:14:56 it's easy to main the horizon code (openstack_dashbaord/api/), do not need to import all ***-client 08:15:57 Why is that easier? Not sure I follow. Swapping lib has inherent risk. 08:16:29 btw, there is another project aimed to provide support for different APIs, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/314313/ 08:16:42 and it's for JS ;) 08:18:45 sorry I'm late and probably have missed the meeting 08:18:46 I don't there is any immediate plan to use any other API handling right now 08:19:11 There's a bunch of risk in swapping, and its just not really a huge issue for us right now 08:19:19 r1chardj0n3s, o/ 08:19:31 The way it works isn't ideal, but its just far from top priority :) 08:19:34 hey r1chardj0n3s 08:21:16 Any other discussion points? 08:21:16 yes, openstack-sdk seems can not cover all functions what horizon need now 08:23:02 think thats it for now, tsufiev we can bring up your points again in the evening meeting if you're around :) 08:23:05 thanks all 08:23:09 robcresswell, sure 08:23:18 #endmeeting