15:00:04 <primeministerp> #startmeeting Hyper-V
15:00:04 <openstack> Meeting started Tue Sep 18 15:00:04 2012 UTC.  The chair is primeministerp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:05 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:07 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'
15:00:16 <primeministerp> Good day everyone
15:00:18 <alexpilotti> Hi guys!
15:00:23 <josecastroleon> hi
15:00:31 <primeministerp> lots of people around today
15:00:35 <primeministerp> which is good
15:00:36 <EmilienM> o/
15:01:08 <primeministerp> #topic Cinder
15:01:25 <primeministerp> pnavarro: so I hear it's a vhd backed solution right now
15:01:31 <pnavarro> #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/windows2012driver
15:01:44 <primeministerp> pnavarro: any thought of using physical devices?
15:01:52 <pnavarro> yes, It's
15:02:17 <primeministerp> #link
15:02:17 <primeministerp> 10:57 -!- Topic set by openstack [~openstack@openstack/openstack] [Mon Sep 17 17:55:30 2012]
15:02:28 <primeministerp> #link
15:02:28 <primeministerp> 10:57 -!- Topic set by openstack [~openstack@openstack/openstack] [Mon Sep 17 17:55:30 2012]
15:02:31 <primeministerp> gah
15:02:38 <primeministerp> damn windows/cygwin
15:02:40 <primeministerp> ok
15:02:42 <primeministerp> forget that
15:02:43 <primeministerp> so
15:02:58 * primeministerp checks out the blueprint
15:03:29 <primeministerp> i can't see much
15:03:33 <pnavarro> primeministerp: yeah
15:04:01 <primeministerp> pnavarro: so in general i think it's great if we can has out real use cases for the driver
15:04:03 <pnavarro> primeministerp: so, about physical devices... I have to do some research
15:04:13 <primeministerp> vhd is great for small
15:04:35 <primeministerp> but we need similar to what the lvm mgmt layer is doing
15:05:04 <primeministerp> pnavarro: how much more difficult is it going to be
15:05:21 <pnavarro> ISCSI target role, AFAIK it just know exporting ISCSI target associated with VHD ISCSI Virtual disks
15:05:21 <primeministerp> to add support for say scsi or sata devices
15:05:41 <primeministerp> right, however to swap that to be physical disk/partitions
15:05:47 <primeministerp> that get created on the fly
15:06:18 <primeministerp> think it's do able through the wmi interface to the iscsi target
15:06:33 <pnavarro> ok I see your use case
15:06:46 <primeministerp> pnavarro: use case is same as linux
15:06:49 <primeministerp> pnavarro: we have a disk
15:06:52 <primeministerp> we cut it up
15:07:05 <primeministerp> and export those partitions as iscsi luns
15:07:42 <primeministerp> by reducing our layers, ... device -> partition -> filesystem -> vhd
15:07:47 <primeministerp> we increase performance
15:07:48 <pnavarro> with this driver, you have a disk D:\ and the driver cuts it up in VHD fildes..
15:08:24 <primeministerp> pnavarro: what i'm asking is how hard is it going to be to have it control the disk, vs. putting files on a filesystem
15:08:56 <primeministerp> pnavarro: in terms of additional coding
15:09:07 <pnavarro> I can't answer this question now...
15:09:12 <primeministerp> pnavarro: fair enough
15:09:18 <primeministerp> pnavarro: do you understand the use case
15:09:21 <primeministerp> fully
15:09:43 <primeministerp> i.e. scsi, sata, or sas device, no filessystem, just partitions
15:09:48 <alexpilotti> pnavarro primeministerp http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771378.aspx
15:09:54 <pnavarro> Vmware, blocks are mapped in vmdk through vmdkDeviceFileMapping and the have no problems in performance...
15:10:07 <alexpilotti> pnavarro: did u take a look at Storage Manager?
15:11:12 <alexpilotti> pnavarro: I don-t think it could be suitable for a simple attached HDD
15:11:17 <pnavarro> no, I will take a loot at Storage manager
15:11:36 <primeministerp> pnavarro: perfect
15:11:54 <primeministerp> ok
15:11:56 <primeministerp> moving on
15:12:09 <primeministerp> anything else in regards to cinder
15:12:14 <primeministerp> if not
15:12:29 <primeministerp> #topic bug fixes
15:12:44 <primeministerp> alexpilotti: has been spending time correcting issues
15:12:52 <primeministerp> alexpilotti: thanks again for your efforts
15:13:33 <primeministerp> I reached out to jay regarding #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/13153/
15:13:42 <alexpilotti> primeministerp: great tx!
15:14:19 <primeministerp> alexpilotti: is that the only current outstanding one left?
15:14:20 <alexpilotti> one of the things I'm looking into now is Keystone AD integration
15:14:27 <primeministerp> perfect
15:14:29 <alexpilotti> primeministerp: yep
15:14:34 <primeministerp> you saw the thread last week
15:14:42 <alexpilotti> josecastroleon: do you have perhaps any update on AD integration?
15:14:57 <primeministerp> #topic ad integration w/ keystone
15:15:52 <alexpilotti> josecastroleon: ^^
15:16:07 <alexpilotti> luis_fdez: ping
15:16:19 <josecastroleon> yep
15:16:24 <primeministerp> perfect
15:16:35 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: ad/keystone updates?
15:16:38 <josecastroleon> there are two fixes sent to upstream
15:16:51 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: do you have links?
15:16:54 <josecastroleon> they are waiting for code review
15:17:11 <alexpilotti> josecastroleon: do you have the revie link at hand?
15:17:26 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/13185/
15:17:35 <alexpilotti> tx!
15:17:45 <primeministerp> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/13097/
15:17:50 <josecastroleon> https://review.openstack.org/13097
15:18:01 <josecastroleon> so
15:18:20 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: i'll see adam tonight
15:18:27 <josecastroleon> with this to submitted using only the configuration we can point to AD
15:18:38 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: great
15:18:53 <josecastroleon> there is a small change on the roleOccupant class on AD that needs to be done in order to make it work
15:18:57 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: is that for tenant's and roles?
15:19:14 <josecastroleon> primeministerp: and users as well
15:19:23 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: do you require svs for unix, to extend the ad schema
15:20:06 <josecastroleon> yep, but as far as I know, this comes with AD in windows2008
15:20:13 <primeministerp> jose
15:20:21 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: i'll be able to try w/ 2012 soon
15:20:42 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: do you have documenation for the ad side of things?
15:20:42 <josecastroleon> primeministerp: cool
15:21:10 <josecastroleon> not yet, today i was updating the patches
15:21:14 <primeministerp> gotcha
15:21:14 <josecastroleon> but it is quite easy
15:21:29 <primeministerp> could you shoot it over in an email
15:21:33 <josecastroleon> i can send you our config file
15:21:36 <primeministerp> perfect
15:21:47 <alexpilotti> josecastroleon: great, tx!
15:21:48 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: and for the ad parts, did you have to do anything specific
15:22:19 <josecastroleon> on ad you need to modify one parameter in roleOccupant class
15:22:33 <josecastroleon> to add groupOfNames as a possible superior
15:23:32 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: is that step documented?
15:23:35 <josecastroleon> In our environment, we won't create the users using keystone
15:23:52 <josecastroleon> i'll attach it on the mail
15:23:57 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: perfect
15:24:06 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: i'll see if i can add it to the docs somewhere
15:24:37 <primeministerp> ok
15:24:52 <primeministerp> anything else re: ad/keystone?
15:25:24 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: are you all set for San Diego?
15:25:35 <primeministerp> #topic Documentation
15:25:38 <alexpilotti> josecastroleon: are you or any of your collegues coming to S.Diego?
15:25:44 <primeministerp> o
15:25:47 <alexpilotti> lol
15:25:47 <primeministerp> actually on that note
15:26:00 <primeministerp> i spoke w/ University of Kentucky
15:26:08 <primeministerp> they were possibly going to attend today
15:26:16 <primeministerp> not sure if anyone is here
15:26:18 <josecastroleon> Tim, belmiro and me are going to S.Diego
15:27:01 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: great, we'll be looking for you
15:27:11 <primeministerp> ok so back to docs
15:27:39 <alexpilotti> josecastroleon: cool. We'll be sponsors, plz drop by at our booth when u are around :-)
15:27:42 <primeministerp> I have the documenation to submit, however my launchpad id auth is still broken and there's not much movement
15:27:55 <primeministerp> I'll try to get something done today
15:28:10 <primeministerp> AndrewWeiss: did you review the docs?
15:28:15 <primeministerp> AndrewWeiss: any issues
15:28:24 <AndrewWeiss> primeministerp: sure did, no issues at this point
15:28:38 <AndrewWeiss> primeministerp: at a client offsite, won't be able to take another look until friday unfortunately
15:28:54 <primeministerp> AndrewWeiss: no problems, EmilienM you were looking at them as well
15:29:09 <primeministerp> EmilienM: you said you had some changes
15:29:20 <EmilienM> primeministerp: yes
15:29:42 <pnavarro> guys, I have to live earlier, I'll check the meeting logs. See you !
15:29:50 <primeministerp> pnavarro: thanks pnavarro
15:29:51 <alexpilotti> pnavarro: quick question
15:30:04 <alexpilotti> pnavarro: did u do anything in particular for keystone integration?
15:30:13 <alexpilotti> pnavarro: I mean for cinder
15:30:59 <EmilienM> primeministerp: for the PDF to be precise
15:31:14 <primeministerp> EmilienM: o sure
15:31:26 <EmilienM> primeministerp: when I tried Hyper-V + Essex, I met some troubles, and we need update the PDF
15:31:42 <primeministerp> EmilienM: we're only focused on Folsom
15:31:49 <primeministerp> the Essex stuff isn't going to be maintained
15:32:01 <primeministerp> EmilienM: it's not going to be backported
15:32:07 <EmilienM> primeministerp: yep, I know, that's why I can update it into docbook documentation
15:32:17 <primeministerp> EmilienM: o
15:32:48 <primeministerp> EmilienM: perfect, well if i can't get my launchpad id fixed, by tomorrow, i'll let you submit the docs
15:32:57 <primeministerp> we can't wait for more longer
15:33:03 <EmilienM> primeministerp: sure
15:33:08 <primeministerp> annegentle: ping
15:33:29 <annegentle> pong
15:33:39 * EmilienM waiting for https://launchpad.net/~openstack-cla approval to push some docs
15:33:45 <primeministerp> annegentle: my launchpad issues still exist, if they aren't fixed by tomorrow i'm going to have EmilienM post the hyper-v docs
15:33:49 <annegentle> wish I had rights to that list
15:33:52 <primeministerp> for review
15:33:53 <annegentle> ok, perfect.
15:34:10 <annegentle> EmilienM: I can help too if you run into anything
15:34:21 <EmilienM> annegentle: can you do something for my https://launchpad.net/~openstack-cla approval pending ?
15:35:20 <annegentle> EmilienM: I'll bug mtaylor and others :)
15:35:39 <EmilienM> annegentle: thank you so much :)
15:35:58 <primeministerp> ok then,
15:36:07 <annegentle> thank you both for your diligence!
15:36:12 <primeministerp> #topic general discussion
15:36:21 <primeministerp> annegentle: just trying to get it done
15:36:45 <primeministerp> ok anyone have anything else they wish to add, or did we miss anything?
15:36:48 <primeministerp> alexpilotti:
15:36:51 <primeministerp> ?
15:37:23 <primeministerp> josecastroleon: o btw I emailed ayoung to see if he can review those
15:37:27 <alexpilotti> primeministerp: I'm ok tx!
15:37:43 <primeministerp> ok if that's it everyone, i'm going to end it
15:37:49 <primeministerp> #endmeeting