13:03:41 <alexpilotti> #startmeeting hyper-v
13:03:42 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Feb 10 13:03:41 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is alexpilotti. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:03:43 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:03:45 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'
13:03:46 <itoader> Hi
13:03:48 <claudiub> o/
13:03:51 <abalutoiu> Hi
13:04:27 <alexpilotti> #topic cliff Windows bug
13:04:49 <alexpilotti> Just a quick one, there's a blocking cliff bug ATM, here's the fix: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/278301/
13:04:53 <alexpilotti> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/278301/
13:05:24 <alexpilotti> as a heads up, ensure you have cliff !=1.16.0
13:05:42 <alexpilotti> hopefully this will land very soon and we'll have a 1.17.0
13:06:18 <alexpilotti> dims reviewed it already, so hopefully it will merge soon
13:07:04 <alexpilotti> ok next
13:07:13 <alexpilotti> #topic FC updates
13:07:41 <alexpilotti> lpetrut found a minor bug, already fixed as WWPN/WWNNs need to be lowercase
13:07:49 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:07:58 <alexpilotti> lpetrut pateches upstream are already updated?
13:08:08 <sagar_nikam> patch submitted for that fix ?
13:08:28 <lpetrut> actually, that was a false alarm. one volume was not exported properly, and I thought about trying to go back to using lowercase, that worked and I wrongfully assumed that this was the issue
13:08:41 <sagar_nikam> i know of these 4 patches for FC
13:08:43 <sagar_nikam> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258617/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/260980/  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258615/  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258614/
13:08:52 <alexpilotti> ok, so false alarm
13:09:12 <alexpilotti> sagar_nikam: yep, those are the FC patches
13:09:39 <lpetrut> @sagar: well, since the FC related patches did not get in Nova this release, hitting the FF, I'm pushing on os-brick right now, so it will be slightly different
13:09:43 <sagar_nikam> os-brick patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/272522/
13:10:17 <sagar_nikam> lpetrut: let me know the patches we need to pick to test
13:11:08 <lpetrut> so, this is the nova FC related patch that we'll care about: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/273504/
13:11:26 <lpetrut> while I'll most probably abandon https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258617/
13:12:10 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:12:18 <lpetrut> I'll add the unit tests to the os-brick patch, and hopefully we can get it in this week
13:12:39 <lpetrut> I have some iSCSI related updates on this, but we'll talk about it when we get to that topic
13:12:48 <lpetrut> please let me know if you have any questions
13:13:18 <sagar_nikam> so lpetrut: can you confirm the final set of patches we need to pick, both in nova and os-brick
13:13:51 <alexpilotti> lpetrut: sagar_nikam needs to backport to liberty, so they dont have os-brick
13:14:00 <lpetrut> auch
13:14:18 <sagar_nikam> alexpilotti: we will try to test with Mitaka for FC
13:14:25 <alexpilotti> the nova patches should be enough as a starting point, no?
13:15:07 <lpetrut> so, the way we're heading right now, you'd need this nova patch and it's dependencies: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/258617/
13:15:28 <lpetrut> and the os-brick one you've mentioned earlier
13:15:39 <lpetrut> but that also depends on some new  os-win changes
13:15:49 <sagar_nikam> ok fine
13:15:50 <sagar_nikam> we will pick up those patches
13:16:21 <sagar_nikam> let us know the os-win changes as well and we will pick up
13:16:33 <alexpilotti> heh, they joys of cherry-picking :-)
13:16:35 <lpetrut> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/249291/ this one and it's dependencies
13:17:23 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:17:43 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:17:43 <sagar_nikam> i am done with FC, we can move to next topic, unless we have any other updates on FC
13:17:50 <alexpilotti> cool
13:18:02 <lpetrut> umm: question
13:18:18 <sagar_nikam> sure
13:18:24 <lpetrut> did you guys have issues with volumes not exported properly using 3par FC?
13:19:13 <sagar_nikam> yet to test with HyperV, was your question related to when we used with libvirt ?
13:19:30 <lpetrut> yep,  when using libvirt
13:19:52 <sagar_nikam> i think no
13:20:00 <sagar_nikam> we have seen it working
13:20:33 <lpetrut> ok, I'll have to stress it a bit to make sure that attaching FC volumes is stable
13:20:41 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:21:11 <lpetrut> ok, we can go on with the next topic I guess
13:21:38 <alexpilotti> #topic RPC networking-hyperv patch
13:21:45 <sagar_nikam> alexpilotti: i have some questions on freeRDP, we can try to discuss today
13:21:55 <alexpilotti> sagar_nikam: sure
13:22:21 <alexpilotti> kvinod: claudiub had some comments on the patch
13:22:34 <kvinod> yes saw that
13:22:51 <kvinod> will work on it
13:23:02 <alexpilotti> kvinod: those are all very small changes, do you have an ETA by any chance?
13:23:53 <alexpilotti> kvinod: beside the unit tests, the patch has been tested and it's all good
13:24:28 <kvinod> By tomorrow noon, i mean after 18hrs from now
13:24:35 <kvinod> fine
13:24:48 <kvinod> :)
13:25:11 <alexpilotti> ok thanks!
13:25:16 <alexpilotti> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/263865/
13:25:28 <sagar_nikam> kvinod: does that close all patches from our team ?
13:25:37 <alexpilotti> claudiub: anything to add here?
13:25:39 <sagar_nikam> or anything else pending ?
13:25:50 <alexpilotti> sagar_nikam: AFAIK there's nothing else
13:26:05 <kvinod> for neutron there was only this one
13:26:24 <claudiub> nop, just re-reviewed it with a fresh pair of eyes. left some comments.
13:26:58 <alexpilotti> ok tx
13:27:03 <kvinod> there were 4 bugs filed by Thalabathy
13:27:30 <alexpilotti> kvinod: I saw them, although they seemed on quite mixed topics
13:27:32 <kvinod> alexpilotti & claudiub have you seen that
13:28:03 <kvinod> ok if any additional info required do let us know
13:28:23 <alexpilotti> yep, so OVS stuff has to go to the OVS project, not networking-hyperv
13:28:35 <kvinod> those were related to OVS and Security group
13:28:36 <alexpilotti> let me fetch the link
13:29:01 <alexpilotti> #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-hyperv/+bug/1543924
13:29:02 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1543924 in networking-hyperv "[Hyperv-Ovs]:Disabling switch extensions for Openvswitch takes infinite time." [Undecided,New]
13:30:34 * alexpilotti asks my OVS team about the last url for OVS issue tracking
13:31:42 <sagar_nikam> got disconnected
13:32:07 <sagar_nikam> can we continue
13:32:49 <alexpilotti> here it is
13:32:51 <alexpilotti> #link https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues
13:33:01 <alexpilotti> so all OVS upstream issues have to go there
13:33:23 <alexpilotti> if the issues are related to Cloudbase releases, then the place is:
13:33:37 <alexpilotti> #link https://ask.cloudbase.it
13:34:04 <alexpilotti> I'm updating all bugs accordingly
13:34:11 <alexpilotti> anything else to add?
13:34:22 <kvinod> so you mean all windows ovs related bugs should go to this #link https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues
13:35:03 <kvinod> so shall I ask thala to create ovs bug to this #link https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs-issues/issues
13:35:42 <alexpilotti> corerct, unless they are related to a Cloudbase downstream release, in which case they go to the ask site
13:36:01 <kvinod> ok
13:36:05 <alexpilotti> at a first glance, those bugs seem due to upstream stuff
13:36:51 <kvinod> this is one bug which need attention #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-hyperv/+bug/1543915
13:36:53 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1543915 in networking-hyperv "[Ovs-Vxlan]:Tenant VMs not getting IP while security group enabled on hyperv compute." [Undecided,New]
13:37:43 <alexpilotti> that's an interesting thing as they have a mix of OVS and networking-hyperv
13:38:02 <kvinod> it seems SG is not working as expected with OVS
13:38:13 <kvinod> yes
13:39:16 <alexpilotti> kvinod BTW conntrack implementation is under way, so SG will be entirely on OVS quite soon
13:39:20 <kvinod> alexpilotti: could you please update each bug with your suggestion and observation and probable next step/action
13:39:32 <kvinod> good
13:39:34 <alexpilotti> kvinod: I'm alrady doing it
13:39:39 <kvinod> any ETA
13:39:47 <alexpilotti> for this one: #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-hyperv/+bug/1543915
13:39:48 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1543915 in networking-hyperv "[Ovs-Vxlan]:Tenant VMs not getting IP while security group enabled on hyperv compute." [Undecided,New]
13:40:01 <alexpilotti> abalutoiu: can you please set up the same environment and test it?
13:40:45 <abalutoiu> alexpilotti: sure
13:42:45 <alexpilotti> kvinod: I notified our OVS team to look at the first bug (the hanging issue)
13:43:25 <alexpilotti> I'm not sure I get the other 2 bugs
13:43:26 <kvinod> ok, thanks
13:44:12 <kvinod> please post your questions on bug page on what is not clear
13:44:46 <kvinod> Also, as you said
13:45:09 <kvinod> a"SG will be entirely on OVS". any idea when is this expected?
13:47:37 <alexpilotti> ok, last one #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-hyperv/+bug/1543918
13:47:38 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1543918 in networking-hyperv "[Ovs-Vxlan]:Tenant VMs not getting IP after following the documents steps defined." [Undecided,Invalid]
13:47:57 <alexpilotti> it's a request for the liberty MSI to have an option to enable security groups
13:48:08 <alexpilotti> kvinod: OVS 2.6
13:48:56 <alexpilotti> so, all bugs are being taken care of
13:49:48 <alexpilotti> only, we need to follow up on the correct tracking platform
13:49:54 <alexpilotti> anything else?
13:50:56 <kvinod> Bug : 1543918 was filed because VM's booted were not getting IP after following the steps @ #link http://cloudbase.it/open-vswitch-24-on-hyperv-part-1
13:51:39 <alexpilotti> kvinod: I asked the OVS team to follow up as well, I commented about where to follow up
13:52:01 <alexpilotti> it's not networking-hyperv stuff
13:52:13 <kvinod> alexpilotti :what is your take on this #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-hyperv/+bug/1543920
13:52:14 <openstack> Launchpad bug 1543920 in networking-hyperv "[Hyper Msi]:Enable security option must be introduced during msi installation." [Undecided,Invalid]
13:53:03 <alexpilotti> we can surely add an option
13:53:11 <kvinod> ok
13:53:20 <alexpilotti> to enable / disable security groups
13:53:56 <alexpilotti> ok next, I think sagar_nikam had some questions on FreeRDP
13:54:04 <sagar_nikam> sure
13:54:51 <alexpilotti> #topic open discussion
13:54:55 <sagar_nikam> what is the recommended way for installing FreeRDP, do we do it on all HyperV hosts or have it in a separate machine and provide that IP in nova.conf
13:55:07 <sagar_nikam> of all HyperV hosts
13:55:40 <sagar_nikam> having FreeRDP run on one machine to serve RDP requests to lot of instances, may be 2000 instances
13:55:49 <sagar_nikam> how does FreeRDP scale ?
13:55:57 <alexpilotti> in a hyper-converged scenario, we recommend to have wsgate on each node
13:56:21 <sagar_nikam> can you explain further please
13:56:25 <sagar_nikam> wsgate ?
13:57:00 <alexpilotti> sure, in the hyper-converged scenario each node has all compute, storage and networking roles
13:57:11 <alexpilotti> so it makes sense to add wsgate as well
13:57:41 <alexpilotti> all nodes are basically identical, with the exception of controller nodes that might be optionally separate
13:58:42 <sagar_nikam> so on all hyperv hosts, you recommend to install FreeRDP, instead of having it running on a single node ?
13:58:45 <alexpilotti> alternatively, the deployer might prefer to have a dedicated cluster with wsgate services
13:59:01 <alexpilotti> acting for all nodes
13:59:41 <sagar_nikam> FreeRDP MSI, does it install wsgate ?
13:59:52 <alexpilotti> time is up, we can continue the discussion on the hyper-v channel!
13:59:58 <sagar_nikam> sure
14:00:04 <sagar_nikam> will join there
14:00:09 <alexpilotti> yes, wsgate is the service for FreeRDP-WebConnect
14:00:14 <alexpilotti> thanks guys1
14:00:23 <alexpilotti> see you next week!
14:00:29 <kvinod> bye
14:00:30 <alexpilotti> #endmeeting