13:01:31 <lpetrut> #startmeeting hyper-v
13:01:32 <openstack> Meeting started Wed May  4 13:01:31 2016 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is lpetrut. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
13:01:33 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
13:01:36 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'hyper_v'
13:02:54 <lpetrut> #topic Openstack summit aftermath
13:03:34 <lpetrut> so, we had some really productive meetings with the freezer, monasca, magnum and designate guys
13:03:54 <sagar_nikam> lpetrut: that's nice
13:04:12 <lpetrut> we held the winstackers session as well, but unfortunately none of your guys made it to the session
13:04:31 <lpetrut> here's a link to the etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/newton-winstackers-design-session
13:05:07 <lpetrut> the topics mentioned here are roughly pointing out what we are planning to do for Newton
13:05:46 <lpetrut> #topic Shielded VMs
13:06:23 <sagar_nikam> lpetrut: had a question on summit meetings
13:06:30 <lpetrut> sure
13:07:01 <sagar_nikam> from the etherpad, you gave, we will have lot of nice support in Newton
13:07:28 <sagar_nikam> what are the plans for monasca , freezer and designate
13:07:36 <domi007> hi all
13:07:39 <sagar_nikam> i see only magnum in the etherpad
13:07:41 <lpetrut> Hi domi
13:07:49 <lpetrut> #topic freezer
13:08:14 <lpetrut> so, we talked with the guys, and first, we are planning to refactor the existing Windows related bits
13:08:34 <sagar_nikam> ok, to use pyMI ?
13:08:34 <lpetrut> this will go in os-win
13:08:43 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:09:15 <lpetrut> actually, they support older Windows versions such as Windows 7, Windows Server 2008, etc. and we'll have to use the old wmi lib in that case
13:09:43 <lpetrut> this also means that we won't be able to drop the pywin32 lib in this case
13:09:47 <lpetrut> *dependency
13:09:47 <sagar_nikam> as part of newton, are we planning feature parity with linux in freezer or only important use cases ?
13:11:04 <lpetrut> so, they were already leveraging VSS, we are planning to improve this, and use the Hyper-V VSS provider as well
13:11:41 <lpetrut> we may also provide an MSI for freezer
13:11:53 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:12:22 <domi007> sounds cool
13:13:00 <sagar_nikam> lpetrut: let me know if your team needs any info from freezer core team, i can try to reach them
13:13:09 <sagar_nikam> or for reviews as well
13:13:18 <lpetrut> sagar_nikam: sure
13:13:37 <sagar_nikam> these changes are planned in newton ?
13:14:25 <lpetrut> yep, I think we'll get everything in during Newton. At the moment, freezer is going through a refactoring, but we'll get the specs and os-win side code in ASAP
13:14:59 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:15:18 <lpetrut> at some point, we'll need to have a CI as well
13:15:39 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:16:10 <lpetrut> ok, next topic
13:16:20 <sagar_nikam> monasca ?
13:16:26 <lpetrut> #topic monasca
13:17:30 <lpetrut> ensuring Windows support for Monasca seems pretty straight forward, leveraging stuff that we already had for Ceilometer
13:18:04 <sagar_nikam> ok, thats good
13:18:15 <sagar_nikam> there was one issue we had seen
13:18:27 <lpetrut> cbelu sent a patch updating the existing Monasca windows agent to use os-win: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/311925/
13:18:53 <sagar_nikam> the existing agent does not start on windows
13:19:02 <sagar_nikam> i mean monasca agent
13:20:17 <sagar_nikam> the patch above is in os-win, can you post the monasca patch as well
13:20:26 <lpetrut> not sure about the status of this agent, but I think that the patch Claudiu submitted may fix this issue
13:20:39 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:22:27 <lpetrut> #topic magnum
13:23:02 <lpetrut> Claudiu Belu has spoke with dims, and it seems like we should make sure that kubernetes or docker swarm work on Windows
13:23:07 <sagar_nikam> monasca support also planned in newton >
13:23:14 <lpetrut> yep
13:23:18 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:23:56 <sagar_nikam> WIN 2016 has support for docker
13:24:06 <sagar_nikam> atleast TP4
13:24:08 <sagar_nikam> had it
13:24:12 <lpetrut> yep
13:24:33 <domi007> looks promisimg
13:24:35 <sagar_nikam> is that sufficient or we also need kubernetes ?
13:24:40 <sagar_nikam> for magnum support
13:26:22 <lpetrut> we'll also need kubernetes
13:27:38 <sagar_nikam> lpetrut: both docker-swarm and kubernetes needed for it to make to magnum  ?
13:28:07 <lpetrut> I think one of them is enough for now
13:28:38 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:29:41 <sagar_nikam> support for windows in magnum depends on WIN 2016 release date ?
13:30:11 <sagar_nikam> if WIN 2016 does not get released by newton, what is our plan ?
13:30:38 <lpetrut> I think we can have the code in regardless of the WS 2016 release date
13:30:50 <sagar_nikam> ok cool
13:33:04 <domi007> do we have any other topics?
13:33:08 <lpetrut> #topic designate
13:34:00 <lpetrut> so, adding Windows support over here seems to be pretty straight forward, as Designate will do zone transfers to manage records
13:34:45 <sagar_nikam> i think designate already has some windows support, not sure how much though
13:36:47 <lpetrut> not really sure about the current status, but I'm sure we'll focus on it during Newton
13:36:58 <lpetrut> so, going back to shielded vms
13:37:03 <lpetrut> #topic Shielded VMs
13:37:16 <lpetrut> as TP5 is out, Iulia managed to push the updated code
13:37:28 <lpetrut> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283564/ - os-win
13:37:28 <lpetrut> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/283567/ - compute-hyperv
13:37:44 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:37:58 <lpetrut> there will also be a tool, easing the way in which pdk files are generated
13:37:59 <sagar_nikam> plan to upstream it ? in newton ?
13:38:22 <lpetrut> yep, hopefully
13:38:35 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:39:03 <lpetrut> any other topics you guys would like to discuss?
13:39:52 <domi007> yes, I tried to ceate a haproxy + freerdp setup
13:40:02 <sagar_nikam> in newton, we will support cluster driver, FC, monasca, freezer, designate and magnum
13:40:09 <sagar_nikam> lots of new features
13:40:15 <sagar_nikam> nice progress
13:40:30 <domi007> and freerdp dies because of haproxy's monitoring requests
13:40:53 <lpetrut> the cluster driver is already supported in mitaka, but only by the compute-hyperv driver (not the in-tree one)
13:40:59 <domi007> I think I commented on an issue dealing with a similar error
13:41:37 <lpetrut> domi007: did you get in touch with our guy working on FreeRDP, Cosmin Muntean?
13:41:43 <sagar_nikam> freerdp - i have observed one issue, sometimes, keystrokes dont work in the console, only clicks work
13:42:17 <sagar_nikam> after restart of freerdp service, keystrokes work again
13:42:20 <domi007> sagar_nikam: did you click in the grey bar before that?
13:42:50 <domi007> lpetrut: let me get the github issue and see
13:43:14 <sagar_nikam> domi007: no, i was able to type earlier some commands, and then i find that keystrokes fail
13:43:34 <sagar_nikam> have seen in 2-3 times
13:44:17 <lpetrut> by what I heard, there were some race conditions, not sure if those were fixed by now. Anyway, as soon as you find an issue, please file it on ask.cloudbase.it or the github repo and somebody will be on it ASAP
13:44:23 <sagar_nikam> domi007: using ha-proxy, with freerdp- how is your experience ?
13:45:04 <domi007> lpetrut: is his github name c64cosmin?
13:45:19 <domi007> he commented on the issue
13:45:48 <lpetrut> yep
13:46:01 <domi007> sagar_nikam: I wanted to test it out but I hit the issue mentioned above
13:46:13 <sagar_nikam> domi007: can you give me the link ?
13:46:16 <sagar_nikam> for the issue
13:46:25 <domi007> lpetrut: okay, he promised a new version 7 days ago
13:46:31 <domi007> so I guess he is working on it
13:47:11 <domi007> sagar_nikam: https://github.com/FreeRDP/FreeRDP-WebConnect/issues/127
13:47:31 <lpetrut> got it, I'll try to sync with him. Since we had a lot of talk around FreeRDP during the recent meetings, maybe he'll be able to join as well
13:48:17 <domi007> great. it seems like a good PoC software but lacks in some robustness
13:48:38 <domi007> but it's great he is fixing it
13:48:43 <sagar_nikam> lpetrut: how does freerdp scale ?
13:49:20 <sagar_nikam> if we install it one machine with good RAM and CPU, how many RDP consoles can it support ?
13:49:34 <sagar_nikam> i mean RDP consoles from horizon UI
13:50:34 <lpetrut> not sure ATM, but I guess it would make sense to do some stress testing and see what can be improved
13:51:32 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:51:41 <domi007> that'd be great :)
13:51:46 <sagar_nikam> domi007: are you planning stress testing of freerdp ?
13:53:04 <domi007> sagar_nikam: no, we don't really have resources for that. The only stress test I did was trying to use haproxy with it but that killed it fast :)
13:53:17 <sagar_nikam> ok
13:54:06 <sagar_nikam> i am trying to use NLB cluster for FreeRDP
13:54:13 <sagar_nikam> instead of ha-proxy
13:54:53 <domi007> in other news we are testing ovs 2.5 with Liberty...sadly a Mitaka patch needed to cheery picked into Liberty, now we are testing if it works with that
13:55:01 <sagar_nikam> providing the NLB cluster IP in nova.conf
13:55:17 <domi007> sagar_nikam: that shouldn't make much difference, what are your results?
13:55:39 <sagar_nikam> just starting,
13:55:53 <sagar_nikam> should have the results in next meeting hopefully
13:56:02 <domi007> sagar_nikam: Great!
13:56:53 <domi007> my experience was that it died so fast i wasn't able to see it working at all :) hope it's better for you
13:58:17 <sagar_nikam> standalone freerdp, not usin NLB cluster, worked for me, but i did not try keep the console open for long
13:58:48 <sagar_nikam> i may hit the issue you are mentioning if i keep the console open for long and try some operations
13:59:01 <lpetrut> looks like we have only a couple of minutes left, anything else?
13:59:26 <domi007> I don't have anything :)
13:59:54 <lpetrut> ok, thanks guys
13:59:54 <sagar_nikam> nothing much from my side, i hope all the patches/features we are planning in newton gets merged
13:59:56 <sagar_nikam> fast
13:59:58 <lpetrut> #endmeeting