16:02:54 #startmeeting incub_sync 16:02:55 Meeting started Thu Dec 11 16:02:54 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is ttx. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:02:56 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:02:59 The meeting name has been set to 'incub_sync' 16:03:03 sorry was lost in a IRC rant 16:03:12 #topic Barbican 16:03:19 np 16:03:25 Checked jobs and tarball contents in prep for k1 next week 16:03:36 looks like you're all good (not just you) 16:03:58 Yeah, should be good to go 16:04:24 The process is that sometimes between Tuesday and Thursday, when you're happy with the state of master and you're not waiting for zuul to chow your last +2, you can send me the SHA 16:04:39 and I'll push the tag and do the Launchpad magic 16:04:58 does that work for you ? 16:05:26 Yeah, I'll probably be emailing you. I'm traveling next week, and my internet access will be limited 16:05:39 that's fine 16:05:44 https://launchpad.net/barbican/+milestone/kilo-1 16:05:57 How is replace-concept-of-tenants-for-projects doing ? 16:06:13 all changes proposed under that topic merged... more to come ? 16:06:29 I think there's one more pending for the test suite 16:06:47 I think it should be up for review in the next day or two 16:07:25 ok, so we'll try to include that one in the tag 16:07:38 anything else coming up ? Or that will be k1 ? 16:08:57 There may be a bug or two in flight, but no other BPs 16:09:18 sure, committed bugs will get auto-added by the script anyway 16:09:24 so that's fine 16:09:33 questions about the process for next week ? 16:09:47 nope, I think it usually goes pretty smoothly 16:09:54 Feel free to communicate the SHA as early as Tuesday 16:10:02 Sure thing. 16:10:07 I won't mind some early start 16:10:11 I'll probably miss the 1:1 next week. 16:10:21 redrobot: fine too. 16:10:40 we'll probably skip it for those who communicated tags already 16:10:47 I'm assuming no 1:1 Christmas Day and New Year's? 16:11:03 lol good point 16:11:05 yep, next is 8th 16:11:21 holidays on Thursday this year 16:11:30 #topic Manila 16:11:33 redrobot: thx! 16:11:37 bswartz: o/ 16:11:38 hi 16:11:47 I checked all CI and we should be OK for tarballs and stuff 16:11:53 so we did the great k-1 purge today 16:11:58 a bunch of stuff got pushed out to k-2 16:11:59 so like I told redrobot: 16:12:06 The process is that sometimes between Tuesday and Thursday, when you're happy with the state of master and you're not waiting for zuul to chow your last +2, you can send me the SHA 16:12:10 and I'll push the tag and do the Launchpad magic 16:12:17 okay 16:12:37 you can send an email 16:12:44 or ping me on IRC with SHA 16:12:44 alright 16:12:52 https://launchpad.net/manila/+milestone/kilo-1 16:13:25 everything that remains here has a good chance of merging in the next 4 days 16:13:34 alright, let's try this :) 16:13:58 worst case scenario we'll bump them at this 1:1 sync next Thursday 16:14:31 okay 16:14:47 from your perspective, is there any difference between how milestones 1, 2, and 3 are run? 16:15:10 from the release management perspective, 1 and 2 are the same 16:15:13 obviously milestone 4 has a very different flavor 16:15:18 3 triggers feature freeze (generally) 16:15:41 we don't really have a 4, we have a RC1, and that's when we craete the proposed/$SRIES branch 16:15:46 right 16:16:03 are you involved with the FFE process, or is that left to the teams? 16:16:05 but the process for "publishing" 3 is the same as 1 and 2 16:16:31 I am involved to help PTLs in already-integrated projects 16:16:40 but that obvisouly doesn't scale 16:16:44 ok 16:17:01 I've been following some of the TC and crossproject meetings 16:17:02 incubated projects traditionally handled them themselves, with advice from me 16:17:16 I think soon every project will do the same 16:17:17 we don't yet follow some processes, such as the specs repo 16:17:32 is that going to become mandatory at some point? 16:17:52 bswartz: I don't expect it to become mandatory no 16:18:05 okay 16:18:11 we are going towards more acceptance of divergent processes rather than less :) 16:18:40 for the most part we try to do things the way cinder does them, but with less heavy handed deadlines and fewer requirements on vendors 16:18:52 sounds good 16:18:56 maybe in the long run we will have to adopt cinder's policies 16:19:18 so for the FFE it will be mostly your call (and your delegates call) 16:19:27 I can advise but I shouldn't be the blocker 16:19:36 I saw jeblair's change last week regarding the tarball release, thanks for making that happen 16:20:02 the only reason I was so heavily involved in FFE was to guarantee some level of quality and that we hit the deadline 16:20:11 are you pretty confident that we'll get a k-1 tarball that packagers can accept? 16:20:24 If I can teach people to fish, won't have to go that much to sea myself. 16:20:37 heh 16:20:45 well, I know we'll get a tarball. No idea if it is usable :) 16:20:53 heh 16:21:08 okay I guess we'll have to just hope 16:21:15 so let's keep this meeting next week 16:21:21 you could toss http://tarballs.openstack.org/manila/manila-master.tar.gz to prospective packagers and ask them 16:21:31 yes 16:21:32 if they feel anything is missing 16:21:39 they usually hang out in #openstack-stable 16:21:50 I know who they are -- I'll speak to some of them 16:21:58 ok, time is up, talk to you next week ? 16:22:04 flaper87: around ? 16:22:06 yep 16:22:07 thanks 16:22:16 bswartz: thx! 16:22:45 ttx: yes 16:22:48 #topic Zaqar 16:23:01 flaper87: next week, k1 16:23:02 moment of truth 16:23:22 flaper87: I'll push a tag sometimes between Tuesday and Thursday, as soon as you send me a SHA 16:23:37 so whenever you're happy with what you have in master... 16:23:44 just let me know 16:23:48 ttx: roger 16:23:57 https://launchpad.net/zaqar/+milestone/kilo-1 16:24:00 those bps that seem not to have info, actually are in progress 16:24:14 there's still chance for them to land 16:24:15 ok, we should fix those then 16:24:19 yes 16:24:23 https://blueprints.launchpad.net/zaqar/+spec/disable-sqlalchemy-as-pool 16:24:34 obviously at least Started 16:24:44 fixed :P 16:25:05 I'll do a ping-check on Monday during our meeting 16:25:10 Should I set the two Undefined to "Low" prio ? 16:25:11 if I don't get an answer, I'll move them 16:25:31 I just set MEdium 16:26:12 Yes, you should decide at that meeting if they are in the pipe and we should wait for them... or shoul djust be deferred and the tag pushed 16:26:24 yes 16:26:41 that leaves a couple of days to get them proposed and reviewed 16:26:54 Questions on the process ? 16:26:55 other than that, everything seems to be under control. 16:27:02 no questions from me 16:27:22 alright. Have a good evening! 16:27:27 you too 16:27:45 Kiall: yt? 16:28:05 Walking back into the office. 16:28:09 2 mins 16:28:17 np, ping me when ready 16:30:00 ttx: heya 16:30:11 #topic Designate 16:30:51 Checked jenkins/zuul and tarball contents, all green 16:31:08 copy pasting process 16:31:10 Excellent, I saw you created the k2+ milestones too 16:31:10 The process is that sometimes between Tuesday and Thursday, when you're happy with the state of master and you're not waiting for zuul to chow your last +2, you can send me the SHA 16:31:24 and I'll make the magic happen 16:31:36 magic == https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Release_Team/How_To_Release 16:31:38 Great, It'll likely be closer to Thu than Tue, but no problem. 16:31:48 https://launchpad.net/designate/+milestone/kilo-1 16:32:09 the last down the list is begging for me asking abou tit 16:32:26 without assignee and not started :) 16:32:27 config reload? Yea, it will be pushed :) 16:32:40 let me move that out to k2 now.. 16:32:42 can I push it now ? 16:32:44 ok 16:32:51 done 16:33:07 the last two still have a good chance to make it ? 16:33:31 "Transition PowerDNS backend to Pools" is blocked on another issue, which doesn't have a ticket (I'll file one), but yes - it has a good chance. 16:33:57 The framework bits of "Centralize validation logic where it makes sense" are in, but there's more to do which won't land in k1 16:34:08 (i.e it's half done + merged) 16:34:17 so then you have two options 16:34:23 I'm not sure what the norm for handling that is :) 16:34:32 you can split it and mark part1 implemented 16:34:39 or you just defer the whole to k2 16:34:50 depends how much the part1 makes sense as a thing 16:34:59 Okay, I'll split it - I think that makes sense.. 16:35:04 and how much you want to pet the developer in the back 16:35:11 developer is me ;) 16:35:15 hehe 16:35:55 basically, if you feel it's worth communicating what landed in k1 to a wider audience, split it 16:36:13 if it's just work items 1 to 4 in a 10-step plan... maybe not 16:36:22 not an exact science here 16:36:30 K 16:36:40 ok, other questions before we close ? 16:37:06 Nope - None from me :) 16:37:29 alright, you're all making my job easy by being on top of what gets done in your projects, thanks 16:37:37 have a good day! 16:37:44 Same to you :) 16:37:49 #endmeeting