14:03:20 #startmeeting interop_challenge 14:03:20 Meeting started Wed Jan 25 14:03:20 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is topol. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 14:03:22 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 14:03:24 The meeting name has been set to 'interop_challenge' 14:03:35 The agenda for today can be found at: 14:03:35 # https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2017-01-25 14:03:35 We can use this same etherpad to take notes 14:03:39 o/ 14:04:03 o/ 14:04:12 Agenda: 14:04:12 #topic Review last meeting action items 14:04:12 #link http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interop_challenge/2017/interop_challenge.2017-01-18-15.01.log.html 14:04:13 o/ 14:04:30 Use this link as the others were corrupted due to moderator error :-) 14:04:51 please dont ask me about my ID10T error at last weeks meeting :-) 14:05:21 tongli to work with shamail to reserve evening timeslot on meeting5 for china interop 14:05:32 Hi tongli, any progress on this? 14:06:01 @topol, sorry, that has not be done. I will follow up. 14:07:02 K no worries, sounds good 14:07:18 o/ 14:07:24 hi gema! 14:07:27 all, please review and update PTG agenda with topics #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2017-01-11 14:07:37 let's all go take a quick look 14:08:20 Make sure to add your name to the participants list on the etherpad. 14:08:30 I'm pretty sure markvoelker will be there 14:09:15 Also we will be sharing space with the RefStack/ Interop Workgroup crowd so we will not overlap with their agendas :-) 14:09:50 gema, luz are there other responsibilities besides those that would cause you to have to miss? 14:10:03 topol: kolla meetings 14:10:17 topol: but that is a personal challenge I have, making it all fit 14:10:43 gema. Understandable. Hopefully it will all work out 14:10:45 topol: I will attend enough of everything not to be blocked/be a blocker 14:10:53 gema excellent 14:11:18 Any additions to the agenda? We can always add something later but don't b shy 14:11:57 topol: what is the meaning of "platform" on the topics we have there? 14:12:04 if we want to run these workloads, then we need folks to be prepared. 14:12:25 tongli whats your def of platorm? 14:12:29 like have account, etc. 14:12:31 platform 14:13:01 like running on ubuntu, possibly redhat (if anyone develops for it) and fedora, 14:13:09 tongli: those are distros 14:13:11 not platforms 14:13:14 that is what lampstack supports. 14:13:16 tongli good point about prepred. Perhaps add somehting to the page that says. Recommended activities befor you show up at PTG 14:13:18 ok. distros. 14:13:25 sorry for the confusion. 14:13:27 and intel/aarch64 are architectures 14:13:42 tongli: no worries, was just making sure I understood what we were going to discuss 14:13:42 if everyone thinks that ubuntu is good enough, I won't object to it. 14:13:49 #action, tongli to update agenda with corrected terminology 14:13:51 tongli: for the VMs? 14:14:17 @gema, yes 14:14:24 @topol, updated. 14:14:26 tongli: I'd argue that if we are going to run any docker/kubernetes we may want to use coreos 14:14:28 #action tongli to add a recommended actions before you show up at PTG section to the agenda etherpd 14:14:51 I'll propose, rather 14:14:51 @gema, people probably just want to use ubuntu for k8s. 14:14:57 oh, ok 14:15:13 tongli: why? 14:15:17 tongli, not so sure. wouldnt most folks in production use coreos? 14:15:24 topol: I would 14:15:35 need discussion about that. 14:15:39 ack 14:16:11 if there are issues with running coreos that sounds really interesting to me 14:16:19 I am not against using ubuntu, on the contrary, it makes things rather easy 14:16:26 but, I'd like to show some variety 14:16:32 so worth a discussion. Add to the agenda for PTG? 14:16:42 else we may be sending the message, if you want your workloads to work across clouds, use ubuntu 14:16:50 which is the wrong one, imo 14:17:05 gema. I think you are onto something intersting here 14:17:18 topol: linaro has to be perceived as being platform independent 14:17:32 we cannot just run on one thing, we need to guarantee we foster the entire ecosystem 14:17:39 If we just ignore coreos we might accidentally hide a lot of issues that operators would hit 14:17:46 * gema nods 14:18:19 So I think it is worth discussing. My view is anytime we hit something like that and things break we learn a lot 14:18:27 agreed 14:18:31 if we decide to use coreos, then it is a lot easier than using ubuntu since docker will be already there. 14:18:54 tongli: I am sure I can pull some coreos people to help also if we needed new images or something 14:19:07 Again, we arent under the pressure of must make keynote demo work for this release. So we can be more adventurous 14:19:32 sounds good to me 14:19:46 gema, is it good enough if we add discuss using coreos as an alternative image for k8s ? 14:20:09 topol: yep, makes a lot of sense 14:20:22 perhaps we have both. My guess is tongli may have a lot done already on ubuntu and does not want to waste that work 14:20:32 topol: fair enough 14:20:40 then the script will be quite different. we will see. 14:20:51 I'll add an agenda item to cover this 14:20:58 I added it to the agenda. 14:21:12 #action topol to add agenda item to discuss using coreos for k8s workload 14:21:22 tongli: if you point me to the script I can have a look 14:21:27 next item 14:21:41 tongli to use binary to do kube, will add an app/scenario on top. looking for suggestions 14:22:04 I know tongli has been very busy hanging out with IBM CEO this weekend (Lucky!) 14:22:14 @topol, haha. 14:22:18 hehe 14:22:21 it was stressful. 14:22:39 tongli any chance to to make progress on the k8s workload? If not I more than understand 14:22:44 I have never saw that many top executives in my life. 14:22:49 * topol he really was with her this weekend! 14:23:09 I saw the pic on twitter, I think 14:23:12 you met more than me friend. So any progress? 14:23:16 yes, I did see her. Sahdev even took a picture with her, true story. 14:23:28 not much. 14:23:33 K, no worries 14:23:46 sad you didnt get a selfie with Ginni though 14:23:54 next topic 14:24:10 #topic Patches that need review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/interop-workloads,n,z 14:25:06 two patches out there. please all review. I will review today as well. THANKS 14:25:27 #action all, please review patches #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/interop-workloads,n,z 14:25:43 #topic NFV, any updates from ATT on this? ZTE, Huawei from Interop China Chapter are planning to submit for this. 14:25:57 eeiden, you around? 14:26:39 tongli, the China interop team is workng on a NFV workload correct? 14:27:07 From Huawei, we might have our colleagues from OPNFV teams 14:27:17 they have ample scenarios and testcases 14:27:21 zhipengh, That is excellent 14:27:40 zhipengh are you coming to the PTG? 14:28:12 yep 14:28:14 @zhipengh, Jason is trying to get these people doing it and I have had a phone call with them as well. hope that they can start working on it. 14:28:32 yes we are starting to gather people around 14:28:39 @topol, I believe Jason (Huawei) will be there as well. 14:29:44 thats great zhipengh can you make sure your name and Jason names are added to the participant list on our etherpad #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/interop-challenge-meeting-2017-01-11 14:30:19 #topic Timeslot for Interop Challenge at PTG 14:30:43 topol I've already added it 14:31:25 zhipengh Thanks So last I heard from Cathering 14:31:57 So last I heard from cdiep I think we get time on Tuesday for our agenda. I'll confirm the exact time 14:32:19 #action topol to confirm exact PTG schedule time allocation with cdiep 14:33:54 BTW, here is the list of participants that I see so far: 14:33:58 Brad Topol 14:33:58 Tong Li 14:33:58 Daniel Mellado 14:34:00 Gema Gomez (depending on time and other groups commitments) 14:34:02 Luz Cazares (depends on time and other groups commitments) 14:34:04 Howard Huang 14:34:06 Chris Hoge 14:34:26 I know markvoelker will be there as well 14:34:42 #topic open discussion 14:34:45 Yep 14:34:51 any other issues 14:34:56 I'll add Mark then! 14:34:58 * markvoelker sneaks in the back as he is traveling today 14:35:32 and as usual Mark is way faster than old man Brad 14:35:48 so open discussion. Any other issues for today? 14:36:42 @markvoelker, will you be at ptg? 14:36:49 do not see your name there. 14:37:05 yes, I'll be there 14:37:29 tongli refresh, he added it 14:37:39 cool. 14:37:52 any other topics for today? 14:38:04 I do not have anything else to add. China will be on Chinese New Year in two days. 14:38:14 if not free time back for all. 14:38:16 that will last about two weeks. so you won't hear anything from them. 14:38:27 tongli. Good to know. 14:38:37 Ok, free time back for everyone 14:38:40 cool. great. thanks Brad. 14:38:44 Thanks for joining today 14:39:12 #endmeeting