16:00:55 #startmeeting interopwg 16:00:56 Meeting started Wed Apr 26 16:00:55 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is markvoelker. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:00:57 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:01 The meeting name has been set to 'interopwg' 16:01:05 #chair eglute hogepodge 16:01:05 Current chairs: eglute hogepodge markvoelker 16:01:12 o/ 16:01:18 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DefCoreRoble.21 Today's Agenda 16:01:31 o/ 16:01:34 o/ 16:01:46 o/ 16:01:59 o/ 16:02:30 o/ 16:02:34 Hi folks, take a quick look over today's etherpad and add anything we missed 16:03:27 #topic 2017.08 Guideline 16:04:00 First up, Nova 16:04:40 I've made no changes 16:04:48 since last week :-/ 16:05:03 o/ 16:05:03 hogepodge: we had some notes last week about suspend/resume not being implemented across virt drivers. I didn't see anything else in the patch that raised eyebrows for me. 16:05:06 I posted the comments in the last meeting 16:06:08 I'll get it done today. 16:06:14 excellent 16:06:32 markvoelker: question, do we have the new repo? Do we need to adjust out git review to account for that? 16:07:11 Anything else on hogepodge: Yes, we do have a new repo. But I think the outstanding patches were migrated over automatically, so should be a no-op 16:07:23 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/interop,n,z 16:07:32 That patch for nova scoring is already against openstack/interop instead of openstack/defcore for example 16:07:55 ok, cool 16:07:57 thanks 16:08:04 Anything further on nova? 16:08:09 nope 16:08:14 nope 16:08:33 On to Cinder then 16:08:47 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456440/ Cinder scoring 16:09:54 I think here again the changes were pretty noncontroversial...I'll +2/+A if nobody has any final remarks 16:10:38 * markvoelker hears crickets 16:10:56 Ok, in it goes 16:11:02 On to Glance 16:11:09 no changes there 16:11:11 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/451167/ Glance scoring 16:12:17 On this one we're not actually introducing any new required/advisory capabilities, so unless someone strongly thinks there's something missing I think we're about ready to go 16:12:39 Anything folks want to discuss? 16:13:30 OK then, I'll leave it to eglute or hogepodge to land it when they're ready then 16:13:41 cool! 16:13:46 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/460105 Neutron scoring 16:13:53 thanks mguiney! 16:14:07 markvoelker Neutron patch looks good to me! 16:14:18 if others review it, we can land it today. 16:14:36 Nothing very controversial here. I may still do a follow-up patch for the LBaaS stuff but I'm tusseling a bit with the Octavia/classical LBaaS split 16:14:55 I'm sort of tempted to make that a note in the BoD report actually 16:15:14 oh actually there is a typo i think 16:15:19 year should be 2017.08? 16:15:30 could we leave it open for review at least before the end of the week ? 16:15:55 zhipeng sure 16:15:55 Doh, you're right 16:16:05 thx :) 16:17:13 fixed 16:17:22 thanks markvoelker! 16:17:59 On to Swift? 16:18:07 sure 16:18:09 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453453/ Swift Scoring 16:18:11 no updates tehre 16:18:40 Yep, here again just some score changes and no capability changes. If no final objections I'll land it. 16:19:06 * markvoelker pauses dramatically 16:19:08 thank you markvoelker 16:19:38 OK, done 16:19:48 On to Keystone 16:20:23 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/456774/ Keystone scoring 16:21:01 This is another minor scores tweak (but needs rebasing) 16:21:26 i think it is missing .json update 16:21:33 some advisory moving to required? 16:22:43 There is one advisory capability (list projects) in 2017.01 16:23:46 luzC: any reason not to move that to required? 16:24:51 markvoelker luzC i think we can move it to required 16:24:54 Hmm, Luz isn't around today. Ok, eglute how about commenting on the patch and we'll take it up in Gerrit 16:25:14 yes, i will! 16:26:13 We also had talked a bit about catalog standardization here. Hogepodge, guessing that's going to be a next-time-around thing so we can write a test? 16:26:44 yup, I need to stop overestimating my ability to deliver on so much. Still haven't looked at the test 16:26:49 Might be worth also including a note in the BoD report even if we don't try to write a test and make it advisory in the next 16:26:56 just got a new comment on this one... says the capabilty flagged as admin only isnt 16:27:05 i think that's a good idea 16:27:23 Ok, anything else on scoring today? 16:28:26 Alrighty then... 16:28:27 Not from me! thanks everyone for working on scoring!!! 16:28:29 #topic Name CHange 16:28:46 Infra did the gerrit downtime and landed our name change patch last week! 16:29:07 So note that our repo is now at git.openstack.org/interop rather than /defcore 16:29:22 I took the liberty of updating a few outstanding things in the wiki once that landed 16:29:40 I also did a cursory sweep of some of our in-tree docs and I think we're in pretty good shape 16:30:07 thank you markvoelker for working on this!!!! 16:30:07 If anyone spots anything remaining, please feel free to edit the wiki/submit a patch/shout so one of us can fix it 16:30:25 thanks markvoelker! 16:30:38 ++ 16:31:03 Anything else on the name change? If not we can finally drop this off the agenda as a standing item I think. =p 16:31:19 yay!!! 16:31:31 thanks everyone!!! 16:31:42 RefStack has merged all the necessary patches for DefCore name changed 16:31:51 the website will be updated this Friday 16:32:14 catherineD|2 excellent 16:32:41 thank you catherineD|2!! 16:33:12 #topic Summit 16:33:37 Last call for session topics! 16:33:49 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropWGBostonSummit Session topics 16:35:07 I think we've captured all the interop-related talks in today's meeting etherpad 16:35:16 we will have 1.5 hours on thursday morning 16:35:20 Please note that there will also be another interop challenge during the main keynotes 16:35:25 i will be sending out invites to the mailing list 16:35:40 * eglute needs to prep for the challenge! 16:36:45 Anything else on Boston? 16:37:13 when are forum sessions? 16:37:47 about the RefStack related session https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18337 16:38:07 we discuss last week at the end of the meeting ... 16:38:20 thanks catherineD|2 16:38:44 since this session is related to the Schema 2.0 which has not merged 16:39:06 personally, I feel like to cancel this session if possible .. 16:39:20 catherineD|2: I think we can do the talk with the broad strokes of the new program structures 16:39:52 hogepodge: in that case do we need to change the description of the session .. 16:39:54 * markvoelker is not presenting this one and is happy to defer to those that are 16:40:59 catherineD|2: speaker support can help us do that 16:41:10 that does kgarloff think? 16:41:30 hogepodge: alright 16:41:46 hogepodge: I have not got any response from kgarloff: 16:42:17 catherineD|2: want to talk about this after the meeting? 16:42:35 hogepodge: sure thx 16:43:06 OK, anything else folks? 16:43:36 If not I think we're pretty much at the end of the agenda 16:43:48 woohoo! 16:44:17 Hearing nothing, I move to adjourn. =) 16:44:48 Alrighty then, I think we're done...thanks everyone! 16:44:51 #endmeeting