16:00:44 <eglute> #startmeeting interopwg
16:00:50 <markvoelker> o/
16:00:52 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jul 19 16:00:44 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is eglute. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:54 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:57 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'interopwg'
16:01:02 <eglute> #chair markvoelker hogepodge
16:01:12 <eglute> #topic agenda
16:01:12 <openstack> Current chairs: eglute hogepodge markvoelker
16:01:16 <eglute> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropVertigo.8
16:01:22 <eglute> Hello Everyone!
16:01:28 <eglute> please update agenda https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropVertigo.8 as needed
16:01:34 <Rockyg> o/
16:01:55 <eglute> anyone else here for interop meeting?
16:02:19 <zhipeng> o/
16:02:30 <mguiney> o/
16:02:37 * eglute waves to everyone
16:03:18 <eglute> please add items to the agenda if you have any: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropVertigo.8
16:03:21 <eglute> #topic PTG
16:03:51 <eglute> We have etherpad for PTG topics started. please suggest topics!
16:03:59 <eglute> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropDenver2017PTG
16:04:15 <eglute> and let us know you are coming by putting your name on the etherpad as well
16:04:56 <eglute> anything else on PTG?
16:05:45 <eglute> #topic 2017.08 Guideline
16:05:56 <eglute> we are a month out from getting the guideline approved
16:06:15 <eglute> sorry i forgot to merge the original patch until i looked yesterday
16:06:39 <eglute> thanks mguiney for getting the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/467528/ straightened out
16:06:57 <eglute> mguiney does the test need to be added to the 2017.08 now?
16:07:15 <mguiney> glad to finally have it merged!
16:07:42 <eglute> :)
16:07:51 <mguiney> i am not sure on that one, i seem to remember some discussion on it at previous meetings
16:08:08 <mguiney> but unfortunately do not remember what conclusion we came to
16:08:42 <markvoelker> I think general consensus was that it's probably a bit late given that we're just a couple of weeks from the Guideline going up for approval, but we may include some notes in the BoD presentation that this is something that'll be making an appearance in the next Guideline.
16:09:25 <mguiney> thank you markvoelker, was just going to logdive but it looks like you beat me to the punch! :)
16:09:35 <eglute> sounds good to me
16:09:50 <eglute> though if it is advisory, i would be ok to add it
16:10:01 <markvoelker> That said, since we've now cut the 2017.08 guideline doc it would be totally fine to merge that into next.json
16:10:17 <eglute> +1
16:11:02 * mguiney nods
16:11:19 <markvoelker> And speaking of our freshly minted 2017.08 doc: I expect to push up a small change later today to add a couple of test aliases that came in after we cut the doc.  NBD, but keep a lookout. =)
16:11:31 <eglute> thank you markvoelker
16:11:43 <eglute> i know we had quite a few aliases merge recently
16:12:01 <eglute> anything else we need to do with 2017.08?
16:13:10 <eglute> in that case, moving on
16:13:12 <markvoelker> I think that's about it.  Once we've tidied up the aliases, I'll get a patch ready to move it from review state to approved state, and we can merge that if/when the BoD approves it.
16:13:28 <eglute> thank you markvoelker!
16:13:33 <eglute> #topic Schema 2.0
16:13:41 <eglute> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430556/
16:13:48 <eglute> not sure if hogepodge is around today
16:14:03 <eglute> we didnt get any additional reviews
16:14:09 <eglute> err, comments
16:14:19 <markvoelker> hogepodge is in Asia this week I believe
16:14:21 <eglute> err, comments mguiney for reviewing
16:14:34 <eglute> i meant, thank you mguiney for rewiew
16:14:55 <eglute> i am ok to merge the patch once it passes jenkins
16:15:46 <markvoelker> I think the merge conflict is just with tox.ini which should be trivial to fix.  I can add that to my queue if hogepodge doesn't get to it first on account of travel.
16:15:53 <eglute> thank you mguiney
16:15:55 <eglute> err
16:15:57 <eglute> thank you markvoelker
16:16:17 <eglute> anything else on the schema?
16:16:21 <mguiney> (darn that tab complete)
16:16:46 * eglute needs to be slower with that tab complete
16:17:01 <eglute> #topic Vertical Programs
16:17:09 <eglute> markvoelker any updates?
16:17:20 <eglute> i know you been super busy lately
16:17:56 * Rockyg hands eglute a nice steaming mug of coffee
16:17:58 <markvoelker> Not anything very interesting.  Perhaps someone who wasn't in the air (hi!) during the OPNFV Dovetail meeting a while back wants to give a digest?
16:18:34 <eglute> yes, here is a short update
16:18:56 <eglute> we basically talked about how interop wg operates and how we create new guidelines
16:19:18 <eglute> it was mostly educational session for openfv team
16:20:01 <eglute> opnfv meeting has a bigger partiicpation than this meeting. maybe we can learn from them how to get more people involved :)
16:20:19 <eglute> Rockyg anything to add about that meeting?
16:21:06 <Rockyg> Well, some of the folks are pretty familiar with Refstack.  They aeem to be going that direction but with scenario tests
16:21:34 <Rockyg> I submitted a panel for that, refstack, openstack, opnfv for the forum.
16:21:52 <Rockyg> UI think we need to do a tutorial on the schema for them
16:21:53 <eglute> thanks Rockyg
16:22:13 <Rockyg> And schedule some forum time with them
16:22:55 <Rockyg> maybe a lessons learned/don't do that session?
16:23:26 <eglute> Rockyg can you set something up?
16:23:47 <Rockyg> Sure.  I'll get a convo started.
16:23:56 <eglute> thank you Rockyg
16:24:19 <eglute> anything else on this?
16:25:08 <eglute> markvoelker do you have any drafts on nfv vertical program?
16:26:08 <markvoelker> I've started compiling some tests and capabilities, but no draft for NFV yet.  For extension programs generally, see: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/472785/
16:27:17 <eglute> markvoelker thanks. I will look through the latest coments
16:27:48 <Rockyg> markvoelker, should we try to get a dovetail person working on this with you and/or the rest of the team?
16:28:17 <markvoelker> I would definitely like to have more input on tests/capabilities that we should consider for this.
16:28:48 <Rockyg> Someone who configures test setup to get what the minimum requirements are at least...
16:29:21 <Rockyg> I'll ping some dovetail folks, but Zhipeng also might know some prople to connect to.
16:30:26 <eglute> thanks Rockyg
16:30:37 <eglute> anything else on this?
16:31:29 <eglute> #topic open discussion
16:31:36 <eglute> anything else today?
16:32:12 <eglute> if not, we can end early!
16:32:26 <Rockyg> maybe one other...
16:32:49 <eglute> Rockyg yes?
16:33:37 <Rockyg> I know zhipeng is deep in the public cloud wg.  they seem very organized.  It might be worth considering trying to do that vertica soonish.
16:33:52 <Rockyg> Or get it started.
16:34:35 <Rockyg> I'm starting to think we need a new recruitment effort,  like we did to get PTL's attention
16:35:07 <Rockyg> Myabe a topic forn PTG
16:35:14 <Rockyg> I'll go add it...
16:35:17 <eglute> i think public cloud vertical would be interesting
16:35:19 <eglute> thank you Rockyg
16:35:42 <eglute> agree on recruiting
16:36:26 <eglute> other comments?
16:37:14 <eglute> if not, we can end the meeting
16:37:17 <eglute> thank you everyone
16:37:24 <eglute> #endmeeting