16:01:38 #startmeeting interopwg 16:01:39 Meeting started Wed Jan 10 16:01:38 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is eglute. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 16:01:40 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 16:01:43 The meeting name has been set to 'interopwg' 16:01:55 hello everyone! 16:01:59 #topic agenda 16:02:07 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropWhistler.3 16:02:08 o/ 16:02:11 hi 16:02:14 o/ 16:02:27 Hi 16:02:32 good to see everyone! Mark is not available today 16:02:38 #chair hogepodge 16:02:39 Current chairs: eglute hogepodge 16:02:49 Please review agenda and update as needed #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropWhistler.3 16:03:36 #topic 2018.02 guideline 16:04:37 I think we are mostly good for 2018.02 guideline, ready to create actual 2018.02.json 16:05:14 o/ 16:05:26 if you could help with 2018.02.json, let me know 16:05:58 if not, I will create it. 16:06:08 #action eglute to create 2018.02.json guideline 16:06:30 also the add-on guidelines need to be updated to have required capabilities 16:06:39 need volunteers for that as well :) 16:08:56 hogepodge mguiney could either of you help with that? 16:09:42 * eglute thinks everyone needs more coffee 16:09:51 yes, 16:10:01 thank you hogepodge 16:10:08 thank you eglute :-) 16:10:48 eglute hogepodge do we have some test results for the add-on guidelines? 16:10:55 #action hogepodge to update add-on designate and heat guidelines from advisory to required capabilities 16:11:22 are all the capabilities being moved to required? 16:11:30 luzC_ good quesions 16:11:41 i think we need to determine that 16:11:48 Unless there are objections, yes. 16:11:49 regarding test results, i am not sure 16:11:59 hogepodge have you had anyone submit them yet? 16:12:05 We should probably set up a devstack gate against all the guidelines. 16:12:10 eglute: no 16:12:27 ok. i guess would be interesting to run those tests 16:12:54 anyone have clouds with designate + heat to test on? 16:14:03 I don't 16:14:04 heat is easy, not sure about designate 16:14:19 i have ansible all-in-ones that they can be tested on. i can chat with luzC_ and hogepodge offline about running tests 16:14:56 have some with designate as well 16:15:11 well, or could deploy a new one with designate 16:15:51 so i will try to get those tests run in the next couple weeks 16:16:06 sounds good to me 16:16:19 thanks luzC_ for bringing that up 16:16:40 i was hoping we would have clouds that would want to get those add-ons listed :) 16:17:23 anything else regarding 2018.02? 16:17:26 eglute: in my experience cloud providers don't really take interest in something until it's required or "official" 16:17:37 hogepodge good point 16:17:42 eglute: so we're targeting approval at the PTG board meeting? 16:17:47 yes 16:18:00 hogepodge is that still ok? 16:18:34 Yeah, just sorting the timing in my head 16:18:41 cool 16:18:49 let me know if you can think of any issues 16:19:24 #topic Clarify testing for interop programs 16:19:38 this discussion is still ongoing. #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521602/ 16:19:41 I want to check with our marketing team to see if we can be ready to launch in March 16:19:42 feel free to comment 16:19:50 hogepodge ok, let us know! 16:20:07 #action hogepodge to check with foundation marketing team on add-on programs 16:20:49 everyone- if you have an opinion on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521602/ please comment 16:21:22 #topic scoring trunk ports for NFV vertical 16:21:39 georgk has a few questions for #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519732/ 16:21:51 "define cutoff score for vertical. currently it is 74 which is just copied from the existing programs" 16:22:11 georgk do you think 74 works for NFV? i think each program can have its own score 16:22:20 those are mostly comments by luzC_ which I extracted here 16:22:44 luzC_ and georgk what are your opinions on scoring 16:23:37 I have no particular opinion. It should work as a start, I believe 16:23:37 I was wondering if the same criteria applies for the power platform guideline and the NFV one... 16:24:12 I need to score other features as well to get a better understanding 16:24:32 or should we create something like the add-on criteria which highlights some differences (as a result cutoff is also different) 16:25:02 #link https://github.com/openstack/interop/blob/master/add-ons/criteria.txt 16:26:12 luzC_ we could create a new cutoff, but the scoring should show whether current cutoff works. i think current cut off works, since all 3 scored at 76 16:26:32 * mguiney nods 16:26:57 so unless georgk adds capabilities with more varied scores that shows a different trend, i think we are ok to leave 74 as cutoff 16:26:58 if all of them pass, consistency makes sense 16:27:06 ok 16:27:26 eglute: ahhh ok, in that case cutoff looks good 16:27:28 regarding the criteria, an updated version for the vertical might be useful, highlighting some differences 16:27:53 for instance, ¨widely deployed¨ is only considered in teh context of NFV deployments 16:28:04 georgk agree 16:28:11 and - more importantly - do we relax the non-admin criterion 16:29:04 special guideline, special circumstances. I'm ok with that. 16:29:15 hogepodge agree 16:30:22 next question, "remove mitaka and include queens" 16:30:35 yes, i think mitaka can removed 16:31:11 unless others disagree 16:31:27 i think we will be removing mitaka from 2018.02 as well\ 16:31:37 bah 16:31:42 time mixup 16:32:09 * eglute waves to mrhillsman 16:32:37 "neutron repo reference to put in guideline" -- luzC_ georgk i am not sure which is the proper one 16:33:52 luzC_ suggestions? 16:35:05 eglute: I think Mark mentioned that a stable branch where test cases are available and working for the guideline should be enough 16:35:56 on the patch I suggested a SHA from Dec 2nd 16:36:08 luzC_ ah ok. i think that works 16:36:14 https://github.com/openstack/neutron/commit/e971f0c317805c89d2ce3e72e6f771a9163839d9 16:36:32 thank you luzC_ 16:37:07 ok, I ´ ll update the patchset accordingly 16:37:11 thank you georgk 16:37:11 thanks for the input 16:37:32 i think that covers questions for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519732/ 16:37:39 any other questions for this patch 16:37:41 ? 16:39:09 #topic Scoring of networking-bgp project for NFV vertical 16:39:11 #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527390/ 16:39:46 thanks georgk for adding tests #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531582/ 16:40:16 georgk is that sufficient for bgp project? 16:40:21 or do you need more? 16:40:46 the test coverage is sufficient now 16:41:57 great! 16:42:00 thank you 16:42:28 oh looks like you updated the patch earlier today 16:43:17 yes, I added the new tests 16:43:17 did you have a chance to add "Should also add one for listing API versions"? 16:43:23 i will review later today 16:43:53 me too 16:43:57 eglute: oh, I think I missed that 16:44:08 ... 16:44:22 :) 16:44:35 do you know if there are appropriate tests for that? 16:45:00 there are no tests for that - I would have to create them, too 16:45:11 georgk ok... sorry :) 16:45:16 well... 16:46:53 georgk yes? 16:47:16 eglute: ah, I will put it on my todo list 16:47:44 georgk great, thank you 16:48:16 anything else on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527390/ ? 16:50:04 #topic Heat Orchestration add-ons 16:50:26 everyone, please review #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529836 16:50:45 Mark has noted one missing item 16:51:47 any comments on this? 16:52:03 #topic Dublin PTG 16:52:18 I confirmed we get a day. 16:52:26 please add your name if you are coming to the etherpad: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropDublin2018PTG 16:52:26 One day for Interop, one day for RefStack 16:52:41 hogepodge ok, that will work. thank you!!! 16:53:33 anything else on PTG? we will need to start building schedule 16:53:54 #topic open floor 16:53:59 anything else for today? 16:54:47 thanks everyone! Have a good the rest of the day, see you next week, same place, same time!!! 16:55:11 #endmeeting