16:00:51 <eglute> #startmeeting interopwg
16:00:53 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Apr 18 16:00:51 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is eglute. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:54 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:57 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'interopwg'
16:01:04 <markvoelker> o/
16:01:09 <eglute> #chair markvoelker hogepodge
16:01:10 <openstack> Current chairs: eglute hogepodge markvoelker
16:01:15 <eglute> #topic agenda
16:01:32 <eglute> hello everyone!! Hope everyone is enjoying spring without snow.
16:01:33 <ricolin> o/
16:01:40 <eglute> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropWhistler.11
16:01:47 <eglute> please review and update agenda as needed
16:02:55 <hogepodge> hi
16:03:28 <eglute> I just added Vancouver to the agenda,
16:03:33 <eglute> #topic Vancouver Summit
16:03:58 <eglute> i dont think we have any sessions right now, I have not looked yet into getting a WG session
16:04:13 <hogepodge> I've signed us up for a WG session
16:04:15 <eglute> hogepodge do you know what they are doing for working sessions this time? is it just forum?
16:04:22 <mguiney> 3o/
16:04:24 <eglute> oh thats great thank you hogepodge
16:04:34 <mguiney> whoops extra 3
16:04:34 <hogepodge> Jimmy reached out a few weeks ago.
16:04:36 <eglute> is schedule set for working sessions yet?
16:04:50 <hogepodge> I don't know
16:04:52 <eglute> thanks hogepodge, i must have missed it
16:05:29 <hogepodge> eglute: Wed 23, 2:40pm - 3:20pm Vancouver Convention Centre West - Level Two - Room 217
16:05:56 <eglute> cool, thanks. 40 min is rather short, do we want to ask for more time?
16:05:57 <hogepodge> #link https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule/events/21678/interop-working-group-session
16:06:04 <eglute> or another session?
16:06:18 <hogepodge> we missed the forum deadline
16:06:58 * eglute needs to get better at reading emails
16:07:19 <hogepodge> I have an SDK session proposed, but nothing else related to interop
16:07:34 <eglute> ok... anyone else have interop sessions?
16:07:39 <eglute> this time, i didnt propose anything
16:07:44 <kgarloff_> eglute: In Vancouver?
16:08:02 <georgk> sorry, I joined late
16:08:09 <eglute> kgarloff_ yes, do you have any sessions?
16:08:18 <kgarloff_> eglute: Sorry, not this time :-(
16:08:21 <georgk> is the call for sessions still open?
16:08:21 <eglute> :)
16:08:27 <eglute> georgk no,
16:08:28 <kgarloff_> georgk: long closed
16:08:36 <georgk> thought so
16:08:51 <georgk> :-(
16:08:51 <eglute> we are discussing the workign group session, https://www.openstack.org/summit/vancouver-2018/summit-schedule/events/21678/interop-working-group-session
16:09:36 <georgk> eglute: ok, thanks
16:09:41 <eglute> I created agenda etherpad for vancouver: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropVancouverMay2018
16:10:50 <eglute> if you already have some topics to discuss in vancouver, please update the etherpad
16:11:02 <eglute> anything else regarding vancouver summit?
16:11:31 <eglute> #topic Creating orchestration.2018.02.json guideline
16:11:44 <eglute> thanks for reviews, after final recheck it was merged today
16:12:30 <eglute> #topic gate check
16:12:33 <eglute> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/562002/
16:13:07 <eglute> thanks hogepodge for creating the gate checks
16:13:16 <eglute> everyone, please review so we can merge
16:13:34 * mguiney nods
16:13:40 <mguiney> will review :)
16:14:15 <eglute> it makes Zuul unhappy right now
16:14:18 <eglute> for some reason
16:15:12 <eglute> #topic Move next.json to schema 2.0
16:15:31 <markvoelker> ...which also makes Zuul unhappy right now for some reason. =p
16:15:35 <hogepodge> The orchestration file wasn't there, it should work on recheck now.
16:15:37 <eglute> talking of unhappy Zuul, markvoelker have you had a chance to look into #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554395/
16:15:46 <eglute> thanks hogepodge
16:16:15 <markvoelker> Unfortunately not...forgot to check out a local copy of the branch before I got on a plane for transatlantic flights last week.
16:16:53 <eglute> cool, hopefully no Southwest flights
16:17:20 <hogepodge> tox.ini needs to be updated to verify against 2.0 schema instead of 1.x
16:17:21 <markvoelker> The failure was in pep8, so I'll have to go pick through it a bit...almost looked like something entirely unrelated to the doc itself at first blush.
16:17:36 <eglute> ok
16:17:38 <eglute> thanks hogepodge
16:17:43 <eglute> thank you markvoelker
16:17:44 <markvoelker> hogepodge: yep, that's pretty much where I was headed
16:17:56 <hogepodge> it's all schema, all the time with me :-)
16:18:06 <markvoelker> =p
16:18:34 <eglute> ok, anything else on this?
16:19:04 <eglute> #topic Missing/renamed tests,
16:19:24 <eglute> i think markvoelker and/or mguiney were going to look into creating a patch
16:19:42 <eglute> any chance either of you had the time to look into it?
16:20:02 <markvoelker> Yeah, I think we got this settled after the last meeting: nothing is actually neded.
16:20:20 <markvoelker> Check out line 33-36 on the etherpad
16:21:27 <eglute> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/interopwg/2018/interopwg.2018-04-04-16.01.log.html#l-83
16:21:56 <eglute> ah ok thank you markvoelker
16:22:07 <eglute> i missed the update
16:22:16 <eglute> ok, so we are good there then
16:22:21 <markvoelker> eglute: yeah, after the sammich I realized nothing was actually needed and made some additional notes and pinged folks.  We're good.
16:22:51 <eglute> great, thank you markvoelker!!
16:22:55 * eglute really needs to work on her reading skills
16:22:56 <markvoelker> Oh, FWIW: we have (at least) one product that's showing 2018.02 compliance on the marketplace now.  Presumably at least one more in the pipe. =)
16:23:10 <eglute> nice!
16:23:19 <mguiney> nice!
16:23:21 <luzC_> cool!
16:23:26 <hogepodge> they're rolling in
16:23:45 <hogepodge> oh hi luzC_! haven't seen you in a while...
16:23:58 * eglute waves
16:24:12 * luzC_ waves back
16:24:13 <eglute> is there a way to filter by guideline on marketplace?
16:25:50 <eglute> ok, so we are good on the not missing tests
16:25:52 <markvoelker> Don't think so
16:25:57 <eglute> #topic Build Gate Job against Tempest
16:26:18 <eglute> hogepodge this was different from gate checks correct
16:27:12 <hogepodge> Yes, making sure interop and tempest remain in sync
16:27:23 <hogepodge> half-finished wip
16:27:46 <eglute> cool, thank you hogepodge
16:28:19 <eglute> #topic Scoring 2018.08
16:28:51 <eglute> has anyone started scoring their components?
16:29:09 <markvoelker> I have started digging into the neutron stuff, but no patches yet
16:29:41 <luzC_> no yet, I signed for Nova, but wanted to check with markvoelker first
16:29:49 <mguiney> it fell to the bottom of my stsck, but i have started looking into the existing caps
16:29:59 <hogepodge> I'm swamped until the summit
16:30:36 <markvoelker> luzC: I've been working on neutron first, so if you have bandwidth for nova right now, go for it!
16:30:51 <eglute> ok.. i have not looked yet either
16:30:51 <luzC_> markvoelker ok, I'll
16:31:13 <eglute> thank you luzC_
16:31:25 <eglute> ricolin you added head interop test repo
16:31:33 <eglute> is that new?
16:32:09 <ricolin> eglute, hi
16:32:19 <ricolin> eglute, it's not yet created
16:32:32 <eglute> do you have estimated time frame?
16:33:13 <ricolin> eglute, heat will help to maintain it, but I would like to ask you guys if you like to be the owner or us?
16:33:52 <eglute> i think we want the project teams to be owners of their tests.
16:33:57 <eglute> and their repos
16:34:28 <luzC_> ricolin eglute: that is for a heat tempest plugin, right?
16:34:37 <ricolin> eglute, cool, that will also keep those tests under TC is governance
16:35:15 <ricolin> luzC_, a separate repo to put all heat tempest tests for interop
16:35:44 <ricolin> s/TC is/TC's/
16:36:26 <ricolin> Also we will add gate job in heat to make sure we not breaking those tests anytime
16:36:28 <eglute> ricolin i think i am confused... this would a completely separate tempest test repo just with the interop tests?
16:36:43 <ricolin> eglute, yes
16:38:20 <kgarloff> most projects don't have separate repos, do they?
16:38:22 <eglute> why not just keep the tests where they are now? i think they are here now? https://github.com/openstack/heat-tempest-plugin
16:39:42 <ricolin> eglute, that will cause extra maintain works for other tempest tests
16:40:02 <eglute> ricolin would separate repo not cause extra work?
16:40:10 <ricolin> eglute, also we have to identify interop tests, because we should not touch those tests
16:40:35 <ricolin> eglute, that will be easier work to do IMO
16:40:46 <markvoelker> eglute: I think this goes back to the long discussion with the TC in Dublin and new resolution after
16:41:02 <eglute> ok, makes sense
16:41:27 <eglute> yes, in that case, i think the Heat team should own and maintain the test repo
16:41:47 <markvoelker> #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20180307-trademark-program-test-location.html Newest TC resolution on interop test location
16:42:05 <ricolin> we will make sure interop team, tempest team and heat team got authZ on that repo
16:42:31 <eglute> thanks markvoelker
16:42:39 <eglute> thank you ricolin
16:42:43 <ricolin> eglute, NP
16:43:46 <eglute> any other questions or comments on the heat repo?
16:45:21 <eglute> anything else on the 2018.02 scoring?
16:46:25 <eglute> #topic open discussion
16:46:30 <eglute> anything else for today?
16:47:20 <eglute> in that case, thanks everyone!!
16:47:26 <eglute> #endmeeting