16:01:48 <eglute_s> #startmeeting interopwg
16:01:49 <openstack> Meeting started Wed Jul 25 16:01:48 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is eglute_s. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:01:50 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:01:53 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'interopwg'
16:01:54 <hogepodge> hi!
16:01:57 <kgarloff_> Hi
16:01:59 <markvoelker> o/
16:02:03 <eglute_s> #chair hogepodge markvoelker
16:02:04 <openstack> Current chairs: eglute_s hogepodge markvoelker
16:02:16 <eglute_s> #topic agenda
16:02:24 <eglute_s> Hello Everyone!
16:02:41 <eglute_s> Today's agenda, please update as needed: #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/InteropWhistler.15
16:03:50 <eglute_s> #topic PTG
16:04:21 <eglute_s> hogepodge do you know if interop already scheduled for PTG?
16:04:47 <hogepodge> yes, I'll dig it up
16:05:15 <hogepodge> #link https://www.openstack.org/ptg/#tab_schedule ptg schedule
16:05:15 <eglute_s> that would be great
16:05:48 <eglute_s> Thanks, looks like interop is on Tuesday
16:06:05 <eglute_s> will it be shared with refstack again?
16:06:57 <kgarloff> eglute_s: Would make sense, no?
16:07:27 <eglute_s> yes, that's what we have done in the past
16:07:45 <eglute_s> I am not planning on attending PTG this time
16:07:56 <eglute_s> but i know hogepodge and markvoelker will be attending
16:08:07 <markvoelker> yep, will be there
16:08:20 <hogepodge> I'll be there
16:08:45 <eglute_s> great!
16:09:05 <eglute_s> anything else regarding ptg?
16:09:16 <eglute_s> #topic Deprecate volume reserve/unreserve capability
16:09:26 <eglute_s> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/583970/
16:09:36 <eglute_s> if you haven't reviewed it yet, please do so
16:10:03 <eglute_s> looks like i missed the part that it needs to be deprecated
16:11:42 <eglute_s> #topic Scoring 2018.08
16:11:57 <eglute_s> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/585772/
16:12:03 <eglute_s> thanks markvoelker for creating that
16:12:07 <eglute_s> i will review it soon
16:12:12 <markvoelker> sure thing
16:12:47 <eglute_s> markvoelker any updates on nova scoring?
16:13:44 <markvoelker> Nope, it's been quiet thus far.  MultipleCreateTestJSON is one I'm looking at
16:13:58 <markvoelker> #link https://github.com/openstack/tempest/blob/306be6ce35652ca6273745b692aed3e681b30d8c/tempest/api/compute/servers/test_multiple_create.py#L21
16:14:27 <eglute_s> what does that do?
16:15:05 <eglute_s> creates multiple servers at once? or something else?
16:15:51 <markvoelker> It deals with creating multiple servers (which also happens to be a thing that happens in the NFV world quite a bit)
16:16:17 <eglute_s> ah ok
16:16:51 <eglute_s> doesn't seem too promising htne
16:16:57 <hogepodge> I frequently use it in my home lab to bring up a batch of bare metal servers to deploy things on.
16:17:24 <eglute_s> ok... markvoelker do you think it might make it as advisory?
16:17:27 <markvoelker> YEah, it's been around forever and is not specific to any particular backend, so I suspect it'll easily meet several of our criteria.
16:17:49 <markvoelker> Just need to dig into things like used by tools a bit more
16:17:57 <hogepodge> It's actually a nice feature to have when you need to bring up a service cluster.
16:18:25 <eglute_s> nice
16:18:27 <eglute_s> cool
16:19:29 <eglute_s> markvoelker any updates on neutron scoring?
16:19:30 <kgarloff> so we don't have any other test case that creates 2 servers with one API call yet
16:19:33 <kgarloff> ?
16:20:23 <kgarloff> Looks useful to me then, yeah
16:20:43 <markvoelker> nope, nothing new there so far
16:21:19 <eglute_s> cool, thanks
16:21:34 <eglute_s> for glance, I submitted scoring update
16:21:43 <eglute_s> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/585606/
16:22:02 <eglute_s> According to PTL the Image Import is now fully supported (the work was done specifically as request by the interop group), and will be available in Rocky. It was experimental in previous releases. The tests are not yet available, but might be ready by the fall.
16:22:29 <eglute_s> so i am not sure if we want to push for advisory for this time around, even if the tests are available in tim
16:22:31 <eglute_s> in time
16:23:28 <eglute_s> thoughts?
16:23:46 <markvoelker> No tests and it only scored 44 which is well below the cutoff score we typically use...I would say wait.
16:24:48 <eglute_s> yeah, that's what i was thinking. Likely the score could go up a little, was being conservative.
16:25:17 <kgarloff> It is relevant to InterOp though - adding the ability to move images from one env to another one ..
16:25:34 <eglute_s> kgarloff agree... but the feature is barely being released.
16:25:54 <eglute_s> they did add it because we asked for it, but it is too new
16:26:12 <kgarloff> eglute_s: Fair point. I guess we need to wait then ...
16:26:35 <kgarloff> advisory in 2019.0x then hopefully
16:26:51 <eglute_s> kgarloff yes... hopefully people start using it immediately and adopt it :)
16:27:13 <eglute_s> hogepodge do you know if mguiney has any updates for cinder?
16:27:57 <hogepodge> no updates, she's also moved on to a position at Intel, so I should take over that patch.
16:28:47 <eglute_s> hogepodge thanks for the update
16:29:33 <eglute_s> hogepodge how about keystone?
16:29:53 <hogepodge> noting new on my side, I need to put the work in
16:30:46 <eglute_s> cool thanks
16:31:06 <eglute_s> same for swift?
16:31:14 <hogepodge> yup
16:31:25 <eglute_s> markvoelker do you think there will be any changes for Heat?
16:32:53 <markvoelker> Well, there are definitely some things to move status on...e.g. from advisory to required, etc.
16:33:43 <eglute_s> ok, cool. I accidentally skipped the topic on when the next guideline is, so i think we have time to follow up on all the outstanding tasks
16:33:53 <eglute_s> regarding DNS add-on, I pinged PTL again, waiting to hear back
16:34:22 <eglute_s> markvoelker no updates on NFV either?
16:34:52 <markvoelker> Nope, none today
16:35:12 <eglute_s> cool
16:35:26 <eglute_s> #topic next guideline
16:35:34 <eglute_s> so i accidentally skipped it
16:35:54 <eglute_s> but i think it is best if we move it to november, for the board to approve it then
16:36:04 <eglute_s> since thats when the next in-person meeting is
16:36:12 <kgarloff> will you all come to Berlin?
16:36:26 <markvoelker> I'm planning to be there
16:36:52 <eglute_s> yes, i am planning. I am sure the weather will be nice and balmy mid november.
16:37:33 <kgarloff> eglute_s: currently we sweat at >35C, I can guarantee that not to be the case in Nov :-)
16:37:57 <eglute_s> kgarloff heh, i will be happy if we don't get snowed in! :D
16:38:08 <hogepodge> I'll be in Berlin
16:38:17 <kgarloff> Unlike Dublin, the folks are able to handle it in Berlin ...
16:38:36 <kgarloff> Good to see zou all there! So then we probably should do the board vote there as well, yes
16:39:24 <eglute_s> kgarloff glad to hear it!
16:39:42 <eglute_s> anything else for today? I am on vacation next week
16:39:53 <eglute_s> but should be back in time for the next meeting
16:40:35 <eglute_s> thanks everyone!
16:40:38 <eglute_s> #endmeeting