19:01:09 <lucasagomes> #startmeeting Ironic 19:01:10 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Sep 1 19:01:09 2014 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is lucasagomes. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:01:11 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 19:01:13 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 19:01:20 <lucasagomes> welcome all 19:01:32 <lucasagomes> so there's only 4 people to the meeting we are going to do some quick updates and that's it :) 19:01:32 <wanyen> hi 19:01:37 <lucasagomes> oh one more 19:01:40 <lucasagomes> hello wanyen 19:01:44 <lucasagomes> #topic Greetings, roll-call and announcements 19:01:50 <GheRivero> o/ 19:02:07 <lucasagomes> today is holiday in US (Labor Day) so we don't have all the people here 19:02:15 <lucasagomes> devananda will be back from burning man this week :) 19:02:27 <harshada_kakad> o/ 19:02:31 <lucasagomes> and it seems that the tripleo check on our gate is now broken :( 19:02:36 <lucasagomes> the bug is this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1351466 19:02:37 <uvirtbot> Launchpad bug 1351466 in tripleo "can't copy '.../cisco_cfg_agent.ini': doesn't exist " [Critical,In progress] 19:02:51 <lucasagomes> any other announcements? 19:03:28 <JoshNang> horizon is underway 19:03:47 <lucasagomes> yay hi there JoshNang 19:03:53 <JoshNang> i've got most of the api part finished (few bugs in tests) and aweeks has the frontend mostly written afaik 19:04:01 <JoshNang> hi lucasagomes! 19:04:11 <wanyen> JoshNag, we need to work with on on adding UEFI boot to horizon 19:04:14 <lucasagomes> JoshNang, awesome 19:04:43 <lucasagomes> alright let's bring it up later on in the meeting 19:04:49 <lucasagomes> #topic Release cycle progress report 19:04:54 <lucasagomes> #link https://launchpad.net/ironic/+milestone/juno-3 19:04:55 <wanyen> s/Josh/Nag/Josh/Nang 19:05:00 <lucasagomes> stats: 1 started, 4 Needs Code Review, 9 Implemented 19:05:09 <lucasagomes> our Feature Freeze is coming!!!!! (Sep 4, this Thursday) 19:05:18 <lucasagomes> #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Juno_Release_Schedule 19:05:23 <lucasagomes> compared with last week we have 2 more bps marked as Implemented (yay) 19:05:38 <lucasagomes> 2 out of the 4 that needs code review already has a +2 so they may land very very soon 19:05:45 <lucasagomes> that's uefi and drac mgmt interface 19:06:09 <lucasagomes> we still have one bp with no code upstream, the author updated me today 19:06:26 <wanyen> ilo virtual media iscsi still have one patch to land, allother 3 patches have landed. 19:06:31 <lucasagomes> tl;dr the code's ready, tests are ready, just gated on their internal release processes right now 19:06:43 <lucasagomes> wanyen, w00t! 19:06:51 <lucasagomes> so let's keep up with the reviews, we have till Thursday :) 19:07:00 <lucasagomes> any questions / comments on the J3 release cycle? 19:07:22 <wanyen> we need folks to review ilo/ipa driver. 19:07:37 <lucasagomes> wanyen, yes, that's defintely a priority for us this week 19:07:48 <lucasagomes> all the J3 code that still need review, we have to prioritize that 19:08:06 <wanyen> for UEFI, we also have ilo/uefi drivertath need review 19:09:00 <lucasagomes> wanyen, right, that doesn't depend on the current ilo patch in the review queue does it? 19:09:27 <lucasagomes> (for the oob virtual media stuff) 19:09:55 <lucasagomes> oh it does 19:09:58 <lucasagomes> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/116561/ 19:10:08 <lucasagomes> alright yeah, we gotta take a look at it as well 19:10:15 <wanyen> It is build on ilo virtual media drives. We added mode mode check and dynamic m=boot mode changes onto it 19:10:26 <lucasagomes> gotcha 19:10:32 * lucasagomes added to the list of things to review tomorrow 19:10:34 <wanyen> s/mode mode/boot mode 19:10:54 <lucasagomes> alirght, any other c/q? 19:11:36 <dtantsur> let's move on 19:11:47 <lucasagomes> aight moving on... (was waiting 1 min) 19:11:49 <lucasagomes> #topic SubTeam: Nova Driver status 19:11:59 <lucasagomes> mrda, hi 19:11:59 <mrda> Hi 19:12:02 <lucasagomes> any news on the Nova driver? 19:12:22 <mrda> So last week we had the great unknown cpu_arch controversy 19:12:36 <mrda> I've pushed up a solution to that review comment 19:12:44 <mrda> but no resolution yet 19:12:53 <lucasagomes> yup, right so in the review ur canonicalizing the arch right? 19:13:06 <mrda> it appears the public holiday meant everyone disappeared for an extra long weekend, or at least from a review perspecrtive 19:13:20 <mrda> lucasagomes: correct, we now canonicalize 19:13:39 <mrda> it was stated by a nova coer that the patch would not be accepted without it 19:13:48 <lucasagomes> right, it would be great to have Daniel Berrange to take a look at that patch tomorrow 19:13:50 <lucasagomes> yeah 19:14:25 <mrda> Yes, I'll chase again once I wake up in a few hours, but realistically there will be no more review until tomorrow 19:14:55 <lucasagomes> yeah :( 19:14:56 <mrda> that's patch 4. There's been no major review on patch 5 19:15:23 <mrda> so I am hoping there's not problems there 19:15:34 <mrda> (6 and 7 are noops almost, should be fine) 19:15:39 <mrda> It wil be close :) 19:15:45 <lucasagomes> mrda, so (I know it's hard to say) but are we kinda confident that the driver is going to get merged soonish? 19:16:07 <mrda> So even Daniel B suggested Nova let the first few that are ready merge 19:16:19 <mrda> it makes no sense to let some of it land 19:16:31 <mrda> so I'm taking that to mean our harshest critic thinks it will land 19:16:35 <lucasagomes> indeed, it's passing tests and all 19:16:39 <lucasagomes> awesome! 19:16:51 <lucasagomes> yeah *fingers crossed* 19:17:05 <lucasagomes> any other q/c about the nova driver? 19:17:05 <mrda> It will depend upon whether the driver gets eyeballs this week, that's the bottom line 19:17:15 <mrda> not from me:) 19:17:28 <lucasagomes> mrda, yeah, I'm trying to review the reviews of the driver as they appear 19:17:47 <mrda> thanks lucasagomes 19:17:59 <lucasagomes> mrda, thank you! 19:18:03 <lucasagomes> alright moving on then... 19:18:10 <lucasagomes> #topic SubTeam: Bug team 19:18:13 <lucasagomes> dtantsur, here you go! 19:18:22 <dtantsur> hi, only stats today 19:18:30 <dtantsur> Open: 131 (-5). 11 new (+3), 40 in progress (-1), 0 critical, 15 high (-1) and 4 incomplete (-1) 19:18:45 <lucasagomes> oh -5 is good 19:18:59 <dtantsur> I'm both occupied and sick and can't really spend time on it, sorry :( 19:19:17 <dtantsur> but yeah, some were closed 19:19:19 <lucasagomes> dtantsur, that's all good, you have that nice dashboard there that helps a lot as well 19:19:53 <lucasagomes> alright, any one has questions or comments about bugs? 19:20:18 <lucasagomes> the bugs tagged to J3, 3 are not finished yet 19:20:22 <lucasagomes> and 2 of them are about docs 19:20:48 <lucasagomes> so there's no problem in bumping the docs to J4 (that's one of the focus of that milestone) 19:21:14 <lucasagomes> and the other one not finished yet is a low priority one about i18n 19:21:20 <lucasagomes> so we are quite good on the bugs for J3 19:21:57 <lucasagomes> alright, thanks dtantsur 19:22:00 <lucasagomes> #topic SubTeam: Oslo 19:22:04 <lucasagomes> GheRivero, hi there 19:22:08 <lucasagomes> any news on oslo? 19:22:29 <GheRivero> no. everything is calmed in summer :) 19:22:44 <lucasagomes> GheRivero, no news is good news :) 19:22:46 <lucasagomes> thanks GheRivero 19:22:56 <GheRivero> i doubt there would be any more libs released so close to the frozen period 19:22:59 <lucasagomes> anyone has comments or question oslo related ? 19:23:18 <lucasagomes> GheRivero, right, do you think we should remove this topic from the meeting until K opens? 19:23:44 <GheRivero> lucasagomes: sure. If anything pops up, I will readd it again 19:23:56 <lucasagomes> GheRivero, alright, thanks for that 19:24:20 <lucasagomes> ok moving on 19:24:23 <lucasagomes> #topic SubTeam: integration & testing work 19:24:29 <lucasagomes> adam_g`, are u here? 19:25:07 <lucasagomes> anyone has updates on this topic? 19:25:10 <lucasagomes> romcheg1, maybe? 19:25:17 <romcheg1> sec 19:25:41 <lucasagomes> ack 19:25:43 <romcheg1> sorry I had dirty hands :) 19:26:07 <lucasagomes> so one thing is, as far as I remember from the previous meeting the nova baremetal to ironic job upgrade is in 19:26:09 <romcheg1> So DB migration tool is merged now 19:26:20 <lucasagomes> and we can do a "check experimental" to trigger it 19:26:27 <lucasagomes> romcheg1, w00t 19:26:55 <romcheg1> adam_g` left a comment that we might not need the flavor update tool at all 19:27:10 <romcheg1> I think we need devanand1 to discuss that 19:27:30 <romcheg1> Anyway, I updated it today and it can be reviewed 19:27:41 <lucasagomes> right, romcheg1 the comment is in the patch on gerrit? 19:27:45 <lucasagomes> do you have the link handy there? 19:27:53 <romcheg1> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112575/ 19:28:04 <lucasagomes> romcheg1, awesome thanks 19:28:19 <romcheg1> Yes, the comment is in Gerrit 19:28:38 <lucasagomes> any other question or comment about the integration and testing stuff? 19:29:30 <romcheg1> not from me 19:29:41 <lucasagomes> ok then, thanks romcheg1 19:29:42 <lucasagomes> moving on 19:29:48 <lucasagomes> #topic SubTeam: Ironic Python Agent 19:29:55 <lucasagomes> jroll, hi, are you there? 19:30:10 <lucasagomes> JoshNang, maybe you have some update on IPA? 19:30:41 <JoshNang> lucasagomes: i think the testing jobs are very nearly merged 19:30:49 <lucasagomes> o/ 19:31:10 <lucasagomes> JoshNang, have a link handy? 19:31:16 * lucasagomes tries to find the review 19:31:29 <lucasagomes> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/112693/ 19:31:33 <lucasagomes> there we go 19:31:42 <JoshNang> #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ipa-todos 19:31:54 <lucasagomes> about cutting a release for the J cycle, do we have position on it? 19:32:09 <lucasagomes> cutting a release for IPA* 19:32:18 <JoshNang> i believe we will be 19:32:42 <lucasagomes> alright, thanks JoshNang for the updates 19:32:48 <lucasagomes> anyone has any comments or question about it? 19:33:50 <lucasagomes> ok moving to the open discussion then :) (that was quick) 19:33:53 <lucasagomes> #topic Food for Thought / Open Discussion 19:34:05 <lucasagomes> wanyen, JoshNang UEFI and horizon maybe? 19:34:14 <lucasagomes> are you guys in sync about what needs to be done there? 19:34:36 <wanyen> need to allow adminto specify boot mode from Horizon 19:34:37 <JoshNang> so my priority right now is to get the most basic support up ASAP and then we can iterate on each feature required 19:35:08 <JoshNang> #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117376/ 19:35:11 <lucasagomes> wanyen, to change the boot mode we simple need to add UEFI to the capabilities of the node right? 19:35:12 <JoshNang> ^ is my api review 19:35:17 * lucasagomes clicks 19:35:26 <JoshNang> i don't think i have all the testing fixes i was doing on friday up yet 19:35:26 <wanyen> yes. use nava/exta/capability 19:36:09 <wanyen> is Horizon for Kilo or Juno? 19:36:15 <lucasagomes> wanyen, awesome, that sounds pretty simple to integrate 19:36:19 <lucasagomes> wanyen, K 19:36:34 <JoshNang> wanyen: so, when adding the node, they specify uefi in the capabilities, and for a user to boot it, they pick a uefi powered flavor? 19:36:36 <lucasagomes> wanyen, we first need Ironic to be an integrated (AFAICT) 19:37:35 <wanyen> JoshNang, yes add uefi in cap when adding a node and use exta spec /capa bility to specify boot mode 19:37:36 <JoshNang> AFAIK, we'll propose horizon panels/api in J so the TC can see we made a good faith effort, and then it'll get accepted in K after ironic is accepted in J 19:38:01 <JoshNang> wanyen: sweet. that's pretty easy 19:38:28 <lucasagomes> JoshNang, ah nice! 19:39:44 <lucasagomes> anyone has any other topic that wants to be discussed ? 19:40:32 <lucasagomes> ok so I think we can finish it a bit early today 19:40:40 <lucasagomes> thanks everybody! 19:41:05 <lucasagomes> #endmeeting