17:00:08 #startmeeting ironic 17:00:09 Meeting started Mon Sep 18 17:00:08 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is dtantsur. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:10 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:12 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 17:00:15 o/ 17:00:17 anyone here? :) 17:00:34 o/ 17:00:44 Kind of here, stuck in traffic :( 17:00:49 o/ 17:00:52 \o 17:00:55 TheJulia: ugh :( 17:01:14 o/ 17:01:27 o/ 17:01:29 our agenda is of course here: 17:01:31 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic 17:01:33 o/ 17:01:33 o/ 17:01:39 and I need to make one small change to it.. 17:02:33 okay 17:02:36 o/ here but only half awake 17:02:37 #topic Announcements / Reminder 17:02:45 #info PTG was a success, see the notes in etherpads linked from https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-ptg 17:02:57 I hope everyone has got home safely :) and thanks all for coming 17:03:05 +1 to success, and ^^ 17:03:09 +100 very productive PTG 17:03:10 and thanks the remaining people for keeping an eye on the project in the meantime 17:03:19 it was a great time! thanks all! 17:03:39 #action dtantsur to propose priority updates and write a summary blog post after he recovers from jet lag 17:03:44 and big thank you to mjturek for taking notes!!! 17:03:55 oh yeah, mjturek++ 17:04:08 :) np! 17:04:15 actually, I've written the first draft of the priorities spec. but gerrit is down, so I cannot submit it for review 17:04:15 It was an awesome PTG, and thank you dtantsur and mjturek 17:04:24 here is an ugly version: http://dtantsur.github.io/temp/queens-priorities.html 17:04:30 #link http://dtantsur.github.io/temp/queens-priorities.html early draft of priorities 17:04:35 now, important: 17:04:47 if you did not come to the PTG, it does not mean you don't have a say in this 17:05:24 the ordering is based on voting at the PTG, which obviously excluded a lot of people 17:05:38 I'd like to hear from you, if you think your vote(s) would change it substantially 17:05:45 I think essential priorities are fixed. the voting was for high priorities 17:05:49 (it will get easier, when I post a formal review) 17:06:01 rloo: yep, kinda. but I'd still hear from people. 17:06:15 dtantsur: right. and the list of things we voted on are in that etherpad... 17:06:18 I'm going to post a similar text to the ML when I manage to submit a review 17:06:28 thx dtantsur 17:06:31 yes, the voting nodes are in the middle of: 17:06:33 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ironic-queens-ptg-processes-tools-priorities 17:06:40 s/nodes/notes/ (how ironic!) 17:06:46 :) 17:07:01 anything else? I'm still too jetlagged to think well 17:07:45 the other thing of importance maybe is that we're going to do the last release when the rest of the main projects do 17:07:59 also note that some topics got like 5 people assigned, so I had to make a nearly random choice 17:08:17 rloo: ah, the releasing topic? yeah, I wanted to make it another ML post, but fine :) 17:08:34 dtantsur: yeah, we can wait for the ML post :) 17:08:45 #info The stable/queens branch will be created on the same week as for all other projects 17:09:02 #info We're also getting back to feature freeze (not soft one) at the same time as other projects (M3) 17:09:10 do I remember it right ^^^? 17:09:23 dtantsur: wrt the assigned folks; we can comment on the patch itself if we want to change 17:09:30 yep, this is the intention 17:10:14 #info We will have a voice meeting to discuss ironic-inspector stuff in the coming weeks 17:10:34 maybe other projects too, will see 17:10:56 dtantsur: wrt feature freeze, the etherpad sez 'let us get back to feature freezes 2 weeks before RC1 (when all other projects do it)' 17:11:06 yep, this is M3 17:11:28 #link https://releases.openstack.org/queens/schedule.html 17:11:47 dtantsur: oh, other thing of interest was weekly priorities for ironic projects & vendors 17:11:55 good point 17:11:58 dtantsur: well, there were lots of things of interest that we did at ptg... 17:12:22 yeah, I'm planning on a blog/ML post 17:12:34 don't want to bring literally everything today, just the most critical bits 17:12:43 anything you consider critical for now? :) 17:12:47 TheJulia: too? 17:12:58 nothing critical 17:13:45 does anyone have questions about the PTG (what went on there...?) 17:14:13 ^^ for those that weren't there ? 17:14:18 so quiet :) 17:14:27 crickets are a nice sound 17:14:45 I'm still mentally digesting 17:15:05 #topic Review subteam status reports (capped at ten minutes) 17:15:15 I've updated bug stats, dunno if we have more updates 17:15:17 i wonder if we should skip this? 17:15:52 one minute to become scared of our bug number, and we move on 17:16:20 bugs == bugs + RFE. me not scared yet :) 17:16:31 fine with me :) 17:16:34 #topic Deciding on priorities for the coming week 17:16:44 oh wait, you have it broken into two numbers. me may be scared :D 17:16:54 I guess we have a meta-priority: to decide priorities 17:16:56 hehe 17:17:06 yes, we need all cores to approve that priorities patch 17:17:26 do a pike release (doesn't involve all of us) 17:17:31 now, I think what we have there now is still a priority and is not finished 17:17:38 good reminder 17:17:44 dtantsur: you wanted to release ipa too? 17:18:05 rloo: anything that has non-trivial pike patches 17:18:13 trivial = gitreview, upper-constraints, etc 17:18:26 dtantsur: ok, ping us if reviews are needed 17:18:40 I will, as soon as I get both my brain and my gerrit back 17:19:02 dtantsur: yeah. those are important :) 17:19:08 I've put together a template for putting in vendor and subprojects stuff - see the whiteboard 17:19:16 otherwise, any comments on the list we have now? 17:20:22 Can't see it right now, but I trust you :) 17:20:22 dtantsur, When do we want to do the tempest plugin? 17:20:43 jlvillal: when you/infra are ready to do it. sooner the better 17:20:44 jlvillal: when we think we're ready? and you're the one who will influence our thinking on this topic ;) 17:21:04 Okay. I'd like to get some reviews on the patch that creates the repo 17:21:08 I don't think the very first week is the best time for that, but I may be proved wrong 17:21:17 anyway, before M1, I guess 17:21:34 Okay. Line 249 in the whiteboard has the patch link: https://review.openstack.org/489762 17:21:44 Next week works for me. 17:21:48 it might cause churn/issues, so lets get that done soon 17:21:59 I will seriously break line numbers right now :) 17:22:05 heh :) 17:23:18 I'm good with the priorities for this week :) 17:23:37 Did we get our team photo? 17:23:51 I got a very small versoin of it 17:23:58 trying to figure out what went wrong 17:24:40 #topic Appointing a bug triaging lead for the coming week 17:24:50 people complained they need this ^^^ tradition back 17:24:57 I hope we also have volunteers ;) 17:25:19 jlvillal: https://scontent-sjc2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t31.0-8/fr/cp0/e15/q65/21731482_1435744956480769_7892607208616630623_o.jpg?efg=eyJpIjoidCJ9&oh=e65dfbcb93cf2bb0583116cdaaf7cd72&oe=5A489A99 17:25:37 I'll volunteer! 17:25:38 rloo, Thanks :) 17:25:42 jlvillal: (that's the silly pic) 17:25:50 That is smallish 17:25:53 sweet, thanks mjturek! 17:26:00 thx mjturek! 17:26:02 #action mjturek to lead the bug triage this week 17:26:04 np dtantsur, i'll throw notes on etherpad 17:26:13 np rloo 17:26:15 yep! I'll try to do something too 17:26:20 #topic Open discussion 17:26:33 if most of you did not have enough open discussions ;) 17:27:51 mmm, should we wrap up for today? 17:28:22 ++ 17:28:24 Works for me. Since we talked all week, and I only had the weekend to think of more things to talk about ;) 17:28:42 great, thanks all! take some rest now :) 17:29:03 #endmeeting