17:00:19 #startmeeting ironic 17:00:20 Meeting started Mon Dec 18 17:00:19 2017 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is TheJulia. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 17:00:21 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. 17:00:23 The meeting name has been set to 'ironic' 17:00:28 o/ 17:00:30 \o 17:00:31 Everyone ready for a meeting of irony? 17:00:33 o/ 17:00:35 \o 17:00:37 err, ironic :) 17:00:41 o/ 17:00:43 o/ 17:00:48 ! 17:00:49 o/ 17:01:03 o/ 17:01:07 Our agenda is on the wiki! 17:01:10 #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic#Agenda_for_next_meeting 17:01:26 #topic Announcements / Reminder 17:01:50 jlvillal: The first annoucement is yours, would you like to take the floor? 17:02:15 TheJulia, Thanks 17:02:36 Hopefully every 3rd Party CI representative is here :) 17:02:59 Basically tomorrow we will be removing the tempest-plugin code that is in openstack/ironic and openstack/ironic-inspector tomorrow 17:03:21 So if your CI is pulling in the tempest code, then please update to use openstack/ironic-tempest-plugin instead. 17:03:36 If you have any questions please ask me or on the channel. 17:03:41 irmc looks like the only one represented here 17:03:43 That is about all I got. 17:03:49 #info Third Party CI - In tree tempest plugin code anticipated to be removed December 19th. 17:04:03 jlvillal: Thanks 17:04:06 TheJulia. ok thanks 17:04:18 Next up, deadlines! 17:04:54 #info Non-client library release deadline is January 18th 17:05:22 #info Client library release deadline is January 25th 17:05:34 TheJulia: remind me, that includes ironic-lib, sushy, right? 17:05:39 #info Feature Freeze is January 25th 17:05:45 TheJulia: what about virtualbmc, networing-generic-switch? 17:06:15 rloo: idrac is, too. 17:06:27 rloo: I believe we agreed at one point virtualbmc it does not apply... but I'd have to go back and look at prior discussions to be sure. For n-g-s, that is a plugin. 17:06:39 TheJulia: thx. 17:06:40 It does include ironic-lib, sushy, and other libraries that we utilize. 17:06:47 Any questions? 17:06:53 hi everyone. 17:07:07 And does anyone have any other announcements today? 17:07:47 * TheJulia senses the silence as a no.... 17:07:59 Is depolyment ironic instance via BT still in progress? 17:08:07 No meeting next week? and the next? 17:08:14 As a reminder 17:08:16 datex: Lets take that to open discussion in a little bit 17:08:24 jlvillal: I was just going to note that as a reminder :) 17:08:26 ok, thank you 17:08:46 I'll miss you all! :) 17:08:53 Correct, we will not have meetings the next two weeks. I sense some cores are going to be around, but please as in channel if you need priority reviews or eyeballs on patches. 17:09:16 I guess we should move on then! 17:09:23 #topic Review action items from previous meeting 17:09:28 so next meeting will be Jan 8, 2018 :) 17:09:37 #undo 17:09:37 Removing item from minutes: #topic Review action items from previous meeting 17:09:51 #info Next meeting Jan 8, 2018 17:09:54 #topic Review action items from previous meeting 17:10:15 I double checked the bugs last week and we had very few bugs come in which minimized the need for triaging. 17:10:55 And I don't know if Dmitry created the nova bug. 17:11:14 TheJulia: maybe add the same action item for dmitry, so we can follow up next year 17:11:46 We can wait until dtantsur gets back. But I did propose a patch to update the priority of the traits work to "essential" 17:11:49 #action dtantsur to follow-up on client version negotiation bug in nova 17:12:01 rloo, Made a comment that she wasn't sure if we update those or not. 17:12:03 jlvillal: Thanks! 17:12:16 The patch: https://review.openstack.org/528386 17:12:16 patch 528386 - ironic-specs - Move traits from "high" to "essential" priority 17:12:22 jlvillal: your reading my mind :) 17:12:32 :) 17:12:46 I'll put that on the todo list for this week, anyway we should move on if there are no objections. 17:13:06 #topic Review subteam status reports 17:13:20 #link https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard 17:13:55 On our whiteboard, subteam status reports start at line 144. 17:14:08 TheJulia: do you know how to update the bug count? 17:14:26 rloo: I do not 17:14:44 Well, I guess it could be done by hand 17:15:57 I believe it's at http://dashboard-ironic.7e14.starter-us-west-2.openshiftapps.com/ 17:16:06 (there's a more friendly url, but I don't know it) 17:16:11 pas-ha: regarding the client reauth, do you know if anyone has volunteered to going to update/rebase the inspector patches? 17:16:18 * jroll updates the count 17:16:22 TheJulia: me 17:16:40 jroll: thanks! 17:17:24 Hmm... I guess mgoddard has started taking over the trait work, is that correct? 17:17:31 vdrok: will you be able to work on the clean up of deploy interfaces? 17:17:40 TheJulia: yup, he has a patch up 17:17:44 rloo: thanks! 17:17:55 TheJulia, correct on mgoddard 17:19:08 i'm concerned about the bios config work. the spec hasn't been approved yet. maybe this week, I'll touch base with you TheJulia and/or Dmitry, and see if we can get it done. 17:19:11 hey folks, good morning. sorry, I got caught up in things unrelated to upstream recently. this week I hope to finish it and get back here 17:19:23 thx vdrok! 17:19:41 rloo: Also concerned, I can dedicate time today after lunch to looking at it in depth. 17:19:57 TheJulia: ok, we can discuss later, thx! 17:19:57 Everyone done updating statuses on the whiteboard? 17:20:22 jlvillal: good work on the tempest plugin work 17:20:34 jlvillal: that seems like the only thing that went well/fast this cycle 17:20:51 rloo, Thanks to everyone for their help in getting things reviewed and fixed up :) 17:21:07 vdrok: hi, do you have some time? I have a question. 17:21:08 Out of curiosity, is anyone picking up the uwsgi work? 17:21:38 hey datex , yeah, ask after the meeting or in private 17:21:52 Moving on to priorities! 17:21:52 I could take uqsgi too 17:21:58 uwsgi 17:22:06 thx pas-ha! 17:22:11 pas-ha: Thanks! 17:22:19 #topic Deciding on priorities for the coming week 17:22:45 vdrok: I have send a mail to your inbox (vdrok@mirantis.com), thanks 17:22:54 Back to the whiteboard, line 107! 17:23:01 i don't think the tempest plugin is a priority any more? just needs 2? patches to be merged? 17:23:01 Easy one is to keep #1. We should finish it tomorrow I hope. 17:23:20 datex: will take a look in a bit 17:23:29 jlvillal: what about the follow-up items? I'm thinking we need to just move the priority down at this point 17:23:30 vdrok: thanks 17:23:51 TheJulia, Sure on moving it down 17:24:22 because traits is now essential, maybe put the first patch down, although it needs an update: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528238/ 17:24:23 patch 528238 - ironic - Node traits: Add DB API & model 17:24:38 ++, pretty close though 17:24:58 I think: Auth refactor, bios spec, traits, rescue, routed networks, and tempest related cleanup? 17:25:15 In order of course :) 17:25:38 what state are the routed network patches in? they were WIP at some point. 17:25:47 I think they were all updated last week 17:26:01 can anyone vouch that they're ready to be reviewed? 17:26:02 rloo, Removed WIP but I asked for some DSVM tests to be added... 17:26:07 Hmm, they do need revisions now 17:26:28 jlvillal: do you think they're ready to be reviewed? (besides the tests) or do you want tests to show that they're ready to be reviewed? 17:26:59 rloo, They can be reviewed. I would prefer an update be done, but the basic concept is there. 17:26:59 rloo: since it will be a few weeks, I think we might as well keep them on the list, but at the bottom so hopefully they get some review traffic over the next few weeks 17:27:09 sambetts, May have more input as he has also been reviewing 17:27:17 TheJulia, jlvillal: ok with me then 17:27:24 any objections? 17:28:49 No! :) 17:29:05 I think the routed networks patches can be reviewed, but until we have a working test env proving it works with nova/neutron, its pretty much blocked merging 17:29:33 sambetts: is someone working on the testing? 17:29:45 I think hjensas is looking into it 17:29:51 +1 on what sambetts said. 17:30:08 does that work require changes to nova or neutron? 17:30:27 Hopefully not. But testing of course will help to find out. 17:30:48 rloo: does not appear to at this point 17:31:03 I am unsure if it has even been tested in a local devstack environment or not. 17:31:09 ok good. if it does, someone needs to point it out. please. 17:31:11 it shouldn't, its just a complicated devstack environment, and hopfully the other projects already have a foundation to setup an L3 network simulation but if not we'll be the first to try to similate an L3 network on infra 17:31:43 simulate* 17:32:05 I added a note to the list saying that the routed networks was review for input only. 17:32:23 That way we make it clear what the expectation is 17:32:56 Any objections? Anyone have anything they should think that should be on the list? (Since, it will be a few weeks before we update the list again) 17:33:48 * TheJulia hears crickets 17:33:53 i think that's good. it'll be a few weeks, but i am guessing there won't be that many folks around either 17:34:17 Works for me! 17:34:22 +1 17:34:53 I guess it is time to move on then :) 17:35:04 #topic Appointing a bug triaging lead for the coming week 17:35:19 Do we have any victims... err, I mean volunteers? 17:35:23 for the next 2? weeks :) 17:35:40 Really, 3 17:36:02 wow, bonus 2 weeks! :D 17:36:12 i mean, bonus EXTRA 2 weeks :) 17:36:17 lol 17:36:25 Okay, I guess I'll put it on my plate 17:36:37 Since I'll be around 17:36:39 thx TheJulia! 17:36:57 #action TheJulia to take on bug triaging until our next meeting. 17:37:17 Topic RFE review 17:37:18 err 17:37:23 #topic RFE review 17:37:32 rloo: do we have any RFE's that need a look over today? 17:37:55 TheJulia: sorry, I don't know, I didn't feel like doing it. Happy Holidays! we'll resume next year :) 17:38:03 Awesome! 17:38:16 Since we have no set discussion topics, we can go directly to Open Discussion! 17:38:25 * rloo just wants to wrap things up since it is that season... 17:38:31 #topic Open Discussion 17:38:34 :) 17:38:54 so what do folks think about a yearly release? 17:39:00 no, let's not discuss it! 17:39:00 datex: You mentioned interest in bit torrent based deploys? 17:39:05 rloo: lol 17:39:38 rloo: I have very very mixed feelings about the proposal and results, and I'll leave it at that for the time being :) 17:39:43 i thought there had been a spec, maybe code patches for bit torrent, but the author left? all vague... 17:40:04 TheJulia: me too, but nice that it is being discussed 17:40:43 * rloo thinks we need to figure out how to work effectively with fewer people 17:40:49 maybe train crickets... 17:40:51 rloo: Yeah, I think BT'izing deploys kind of goes hand-in-hand with pre-deployed machines, and that code never completely landed... that is unless it just becomes the machine can grok image_source being a bittorrent tracker url.... 17:41:09 TheJulia: well, datex hasn't responded so... 17:41:19 rloo: That is a very good topic for the PTG, but something we should ponder.... 17:41:19 Are there only crickets now? 17:41:32 I think there are only crickets.... 17:41:46 I must run a boring meeting :( 17:41:59 * rloo thinks TheJulia is really effective :) 17:42:32 Last call for any open discussion topics, or I'll close our meeting out for this week in a couple minutes 17:42:56 the last meeting of the year 17:43:05 we need an action item : everyone have FUN 17:43:23 rloo: lol 17:43:27 I hope you have a wonderful holiday season, ironicers. And Happy 2018! 17:43:36 ++ 17:43:39 #action Everyone have a wonderful quiet holiday! :) 17:43:44 ++ 17:43:55 +++ 17:44:00 Thanks everyone! 17:44:02 :) 17:44:17 sorry i'm back 17:44:58 datex: Does the discussion from a few minutes ago give you an idea? We can dig up some links and discus further if your interested in carrying forward such a feature? 17:45:35 yes, i'm interested in bt deploy 'cause i saw this post https://www.mirantis.com/blog/cut-ironic-provisioning-time-using-torrents/ 17:46:32 Okay, well in that case, I'll end the meeting. 17:46:38 Thanks again everyone! 17:46:42 #endmeeting