15:00:20 <mgoddard> #startmeeting ironic
15:00:22 <openstack> Meeting started Mon Sep 16 15:00:20 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mgoddard. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
15:00:23 <openstack> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
15:00:25 <openstack> The meeting name has been set to 'ironic'
15:00:31 <mgoddard> #topic rollcall
15:00:35 <mgoddard> \o
15:00:37 <etingof> o/
15:00:37 <cdearborn> o/
15:00:38 <rpioso> o/
15:00:41 <kaifeng> o/
15:00:42 <rpittau> o/
15:00:48 <rloo> o/
15:01:51 <mgoddard> dtantsur|bbl: was busy today, so you'll have to put up with me
15:02:21 <rloo> :)
15:02:35 <mgoddard> I don't have all the context, so feel free to nudge me if I miss something
15:03:12 <mgoddard> #topic announcements
15:03:35 <mgoddard> #info We are currently in soft feature freeze
15:04:19 <mgoddard> #info Stable branch creation / RC1 planned for end of this week
15:04:33 <mgoddard> #link https://releases.openstack.org/train/schedule.html
15:04:40 <mgoddard> What did I miss?
15:05:27 <rloo> i think that after RC1 is done, that is basically feature freeze. only bugs.
15:05:36 <rloo> and docs.
15:05:41 <rpioso> mgoddard: A link to the meeting agenda, although it's not much :-)
15:05:55 <mgoddard> Agenda at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic
15:06:19 <mgoddard> rloo: that's hard feature freeze, as opposed to soft?
15:06:50 <openstackgerrit> Rachit Kapadia proposed openstack/ironic master: DRAC: Drives conversion from JBOD to RAID  https://review.opendev.org/679093
15:06:52 <rloo> mgoddard: yup. according to the schedule, there isn't any hard/soft feature freeze :)
15:07:13 <rloo> mgoddard: i believe dtantsur|bbl wanted the rc1 cut this week, although the schedule shows it as next week.
15:07:34 <rloo> mgoddard: let's go with the planned rc1 cut this week. see how it goes.
15:07:38 <mgoddard> No - officially it was feature freeze last week, then 2 weeks of stability before RC1
15:07:58 <mgoddard> +1
15:08:00 <rpittau> yep, as a precation we should cut by the end of this week
15:08:03 <iurygregory> o/
15:08:46 <mgoddard> No action items from last week's meeting to review
15:09:01 <mgoddard> #topic Review subteam status reports
15:09:25 <mgoddard> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/IronicWhiteBoard
15:09:34 <mgoddard> Starting at L212
15:11:18 <rloo> for deploy steps, are we trying to get idrac RAID & ilo mgt deploy steps?
15:11:29 <rloo> for train I mean.
15:12:00 <mgoddard> good question
15:12:25 <mgoddard> I would like the idrac RAID, but I realise it is past freeze
15:12:41 <mgoddard> do we normally apply the freeze strictly for drivers?
15:13:19 <rloo> mgoddard: i reviewed idrac RAID, had a few comments. I'm good with trying to land it but I also am unopinionated about it.
15:13:51 <rloo> mgoddard: i thought we mentioned last week, that we'd like to get it in but I am not sure.
15:14:24 <mgoddard> I we did, although we're a week closer to release
15:15:07 <rloo> mgoddard: ok, just let me know if you'd like me to review it or not :)
15:15:31 <mgoddard> I'll update it to fix the comments
15:15:54 <mgoddard> if we can get it reviewed in the next few days that would be great
15:16:10 <mgoddard> otherwise we'd need to cherry pick, which is probably a different matter
15:17:31 <mgoddard> did we get anywhere with the indicator patches?
15:17:52 <mgoddard> looks like no
15:18:01 <rpittau> mmm not realyl
15:18:39 <rpittau> I'll do my best to give them some attention tomorrow and in the next days
15:18:47 <mgoddard> ok
15:19:06 <mgoddard> still a few fixes open for sw raid, but I guess they can be backported if necessary
15:19:55 <mgoddard> any others we should discuss?
15:20:57 <mgoddard> I guess not
15:21:06 <mgoddard> #topic Deciding on priorities for the coming week
15:21:32 <mgoddard> Starting at L120
15:21:57 <mgoddard> we have two specs with -1s, should they still be priorities?
15:22:40 <rloo> i was wondering too.
15:23:20 <dtantsur> o/
15:23:26 <mgoddard> hi dtantsur
15:23:35 <mgoddard> should we add those SW RAID fixes to priorities
15:23:38 <mgoddard> ?
15:23:47 <dtantsur> likely yes
15:23:52 <dtantsur> to have the feature complete
15:24:16 <mgoddard> done
15:24:18 <dtantsur> as to the deadlines, next week is RC1 *deadline*. we can do it early and we should do it at least slightly earlier (to avoid grenade issues, etc)
15:24:50 <mgoddard> beat the queues
15:25:01 <dtantsur> note that we don't have a release candidate. RC1 for us will be a release with creating stable/train.
15:25:13 <dtantsur> which means hard feature freeze on train and master opened for development
15:25:49 <mgoddard> when you say release, you mean final release?
15:26:21 <dtantsur> all releases are final in this channel :)
15:26:47 <dtantsur> we can continue bug fix releases from stable/train during all time, except for the total freeze the week of the final release
15:27:15 <mgoddard> ok
15:27:27 <mgoddard> did you see the discussion of deploy steps earlier?
15:27:54 <mgoddard> opinion on ilo management and idrac RAID steps?
15:29:15 <dtantsur> since they're not on critical path, I'm fine with adding them
15:29:21 <dtantsur> but let's have a deadline
15:29:32 <mgoddard> ok
15:29:36 <dtantsur> how much will it take, does anybody know?
15:30:04 <mgoddard> idrac has had a +1 with comments from rloo, I can push an update shortly
15:30:27 <mgoddard> I don't know about ilo management
15:30:36 <stendulker> ilo management was reviwed by TheJulia and dtantsur. All comments addressed.
15:30:43 <rpittau> ilo mgmt seems to have passed thrgouh few comments, might be close
15:30:51 <rpittau> closer*
15:31:00 <dtantsur> okay, so approved by Wed EOD?
15:31:14 <mgoddard> +1
15:31:21 <rpittau> +1
15:32:11 <mgoddard> added a note in the pad
15:33:13 <mgoddard> How are the priorities looking?
15:33:18 <mgoddard> Anything else we need?
15:34:31 <mgoddard> I'll take that as a no
15:34:36 <rloo> i suppose what i'd like is the priorities in our weekly priorities, to be ordered by priority
15:34:39 <rloo> but anyway...
15:34:46 <mgoddard> interesting point
15:34:57 <rpittau> actually same
15:35:16 <arne_wiebalck> o/
15:35:18 <rpittau> would not be bad to have an order
15:35:18 <mgoddard> I guess the idea is supposed to be that it's enough that we can just do it all, but often that's not the case
15:35:22 <rloo> i mean, which of these do we want to land, for rc1?
15:35:48 <rpittau> I guess deploy steps and SW raid should be top
15:36:15 <rloo> pdf doc for ironic?
15:36:48 <dtantsur> maybe we should get back to trello for priorities?
15:36:53 <kaifeng> it's a community goal so would be good to land in time
15:37:00 <dtantsur> prioritizing anything in an etherpad is a thankless task
15:37:13 <kaifeng> but we can backport it according to ML today
15:37:14 <rloo> we used to order them by priority before.
15:37:16 <dtantsur> ++ to the PDF goal, which, i hope, we've largely finished
15:37:19 <rpittau> kaifeng: I don't remember, is it the last one ?
15:37:36 <kaifeng> rpittau: yeah, ironic is the last patch
15:37:43 <rpittau> ok, thanks
15:38:17 <rloo> is it ok if i rearrange them then?
15:38:19 <rpittau> we should also add the ironic-lib one, it has 1 +2
15:38:23 <mgoddard> we already voted for features, and some have higher priority through that
15:38:27 <dtantsur> rpittau: I'll approve it soon
15:38:37 <rpittau> ok
15:38:40 <kaifeng> I'll abandon the molteniron one, since it doesn't have a doc job at all (the same for virtualpdu)
15:39:18 <mgoddard> should we just add a 'high priority' list?
15:39:31 <rpittau> I'm rechecking the ironic pdf one, completely forgot about that!
15:39:36 <rloo> and sorry, quick question about the software RAID, bootloader improvements. L143. someone asks 'is this a feature'. Does anyone know?
15:39:53 <dtantsur> that's these sort of changes where you don't know for sure
15:40:05 <mgoddard> arne_wiebalck might know :)
15:40:25 <rloo> well, if it is a feature, we need to land it this week for rc1, or it waits til U, right?
15:40:29 <arne_wiebalck> I'd say yes
15:40:31 <dtantsur> exactly
15:40:44 <dtantsur> maybe we should also set a deadline of Wed EOD for them?
15:40:46 <arne_wiebalck> I'll try to have a look this week
15:41:01 <rloo> mgoddard: i'm good with a high priority list for now. whatever works so i know what to focus on this week :)
15:41:25 <mgoddard> Wed EOD deadline makes sense
15:41:29 <mgoddard> (added)
15:42:13 <arne_wiebalck> clearly a feature: removes some of the current limitations
15:42:39 <mgoddard> Are we agreed on what the high priorities are?
15:42:41 <kaifeng> it seems L134-135 can be moved downwards, they either needs discussion or rebase
15:43:11 <mgoddard> deploy steps, sw raid, pdf ?
15:43:25 * dtantsur needs to check if L134 needs his action
15:43:39 <kaifeng> L134 is Add option to abort cleaning and deployment
15:43:44 <rloo> dtantsur: yup, your attention to it would be useful. i commented :)
15:43:56 <dtantsur> thx! will try to get to it today (crazy day)
15:44:10 <rloo> dtantsur: no worries. i think we can land it, if you agree with me. very close!
15:45:02 <rloo> ++ to priorities. thx mgoddard!
15:45:11 <mgoddard> I added a high priorities section
15:45:53 <mgoddard> any more priority discussion needed?
15:46:02 <rpittau> we should be ok
15:46:53 <mgoddard> #topic Open discussion
15:47:08 <mgoddard> Bring out your discussion items
15:47:50 <tzumainn> hi! I'm kinda new here, but I wrote up a spec last week - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/681066/ - is this the appropriate time to bring it up?
15:47:51 <patchbot> patch 681066 - ironic-specs - Expose node owner information to oslo.policy checks - 5 patch sets
15:48:02 <dtantsur> tzumainn: exactly the right time, yes
15:48:17 <dtantsur> and thanks, I'll get back to it soon (tm)
15:48:25 <tzumainn> okay, well, there it is - any thoughts are appreciated, but it sounds like a busy time right now!
15:48:30 <tzumainn> dtantsur, thanks!
15:49:57 <rpioso> mgoddard: I'd just like to draw folks' attention to the idrac's Vendor Priorities, lines 179-183. They're related, and the first one, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/681046, has the highest priority.
15:49:57 <patchbot> patch 681046 - ironic - Add first idrac HW type Redfish interface support - 4 patch sets
15:50:56 <mgoddard> rpioso: is this something that needs to land in train?
15:51:24 <openstackgerrit> Merged openstack/ironic-lib stable/train: Build pdf doc  https://review.opendev.org/682274
15:51:58 <rpioso> mgoddard: Long story, short, yes :-)
15:52:25 <mgoddard> ok. Same rule applies then? Land by EOD weds
15:52:25 <openstackgerrit> Nguyen Van Trung proposed openstack/ironic master: Support firmware upgrade for irmc driver  https://review.opendev.org/599992
15:52:36 <rpioso> mgoddard: Thank you!
15:52:48 <mgoddard> I assume you're only talking about the first one for train?
15:53:08 <dtantsur> rpioso: +2 with a question about online data migrations
15:53:37 <rpioso> mgoddard: The more the merrier, but yes, the first is the highest priority. The others are similar to the first.
15:53:45 <openstackgerrit> Mark Goddard proposed openstack/ironic master: Add iDRAC RAID deploy steps  https://review.opendev.org/641731
15:53:59 <mgoddard> rpioso: at least one I saw has a WIP label :)
15:54:15 <dtantsur> rpioso: 2nd one needs rebasing
15:54:30 <rpioso> dtantsur: Thank you. May we discuss more after the meeting?
15:54:37 <dtantsur> yep
15:54:43 <mgoddard> the other has a merge conflict and no reviews yet
15:54:45 <dtantsur> 3rd one fails the CI and has [WIP]
15:54:49 <dtantsur> please clean up them
15:54:58 <rpioso> mgoddard, dtantsur: Ack re: cleaning them up.
15:55:22 * rpioso will make them sparkle brightly
15:57:13 <mgoddard> crickets?
15:57:18 <rpittau> lots
15:58:01 <dtantsur> I have one in this room :D
15:58:11 <dtantsur> or maybe it's a different animal, I'm not sure
15:58:13 <mgoddard> ok, thanks everyone. Usual service resumes next week
15:58:18 <mgoddard> #endmeeting